On Tuesday 30 November 2004 15:54, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Nov 30 2004, Richard Hult wrote:
> Also, which one integrates better with laptop-mode? I'm thinking of using
> laptop-mode even for my i386 Desktop (since I can't stand the noise of its
> HD).
Umm... perhaps it is a long shot, but I wou
On Nov 30 2004, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This is likely to shorten the life of your old HD enough that the noise
> won't be an issue for too long.
>
> Spin-up and spin-down cycles on old equipment is *never* a good idea.
Yes, I know about this issue. I think that getting some more RAM
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Rogério Brito wrote:
> laptop-mode even for my i386 Desktop (since I can't stand the noise of its
> HD).
This is likely to shorten the life of your old HD enough that the noise
won't be an issue for too long.
Spin-up and spin-down cycles on old equipment is *never* a good ide
On Nov 30 2004, Richard Hult wrote:
> This is without running any frequency scaling at all (no powernod,
> cpydyn, or cpufreqd), and also without spinning down the hard drive.
Would anybody provide a short description of which one of these frequency
scaling packages (powernowd, cpudyn, cpufreqd)
4 matches
Mail list logo
