On Nov 30 2004, Richard Hult wrote: > This is without running any frequency scaling at all (no powernod, > cpydyn, or cpufreqd), and also without spinning down the hard drive.
Would anybody provide a short description of which one of these frequency scaling packages (powernowd, cpudyn, cpufreqd) is "better"? I find it confusing to have them all in Debian. Their descriptions don't always help much discerning which one is better for the job (apart from powernowd's description saying that it is simpler than cpufreqd and cpudyn). Also, which one integrates better with laptop-mode? I'm thinking of using laptop-mode even for my i386 Desktop (since I can't stand the noise of its HD). Thanks for sharing any experiences, Rogério Brito. -- Learn to quote e-mails decently at: http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php http://learn.to/quote http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/toppost.htm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
