Re: One More time.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:47:49AM -0500, Bradley Pursley wrote: > I will ask this again (for the 3rd time) and then am going to drop it > assuming that no one knows the answer. Does anyone know what has happened > to all of the older versions like Potato or Slink, previous to Woody, of >

Re: Debian release archive (was: One More time.)

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:52:16 +0200, Florian Ernst writes: >You mean the list of mirrors from >? The first one I tried >(ftp.de.debian.org, closest to me) seems to work fine, same applies to >others, but admittedly not all of them. Some of those don't actuall

Re: One More time.

I have copy of 2.1 (slink?) and 2.2 (potato?) on CD, and I'm more than happy to do you a copy if you want... - Original Message - From: "Bradley Pursley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:

Debian release archive (was: One More time.)

Hello! On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:47:49AM -0500, Bradley Pursley wrote: > I will ask this again (for the 3rd time) and then am going to drop it > assuming that no one knows the answer. Does anyone know what has happened > to all of the older versions like Potato or Slink, previous to Wood

One More time.

I will ask this again (for the 3rd time) and then am going to drop it assuming that no one knows the answer. Does anyone know what has happened to all of the older versions like Potato or Slink, previous to Woody, of Debian? The archive.debian.org site isn't responding and the debain-ar

Re: Fonts, one more time

On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 03:49:11PM -0200, Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corsetti Dutra said > On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:38:49 +, M.Kirchhoff wrote: > > > Sarge includes Gnome 2.4 and KDE 3.x, fonts *will* look good > > out-of-the-box, thanks in part to the high-quality bitstream-vera set of > > fonts.

Re: Fonts, one more time

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:38:49 +, M.Kirchhoff wrote: > Sarge includes Gnome 2.4 and KDE 3.x, fonts *will* look good > out-of-the-box, thanks in part to the high-quality bitstream-vera set of > fonts. Aren't them proprietary? -- Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11

Re: Fonts, one more time

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:45:52 -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > "users" have no business messing with fonts in the first > place. They "use" what they're given. OK then, give'm something decent in the very first place. -- Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219 Av

Re: Fonts, one more time

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:50:24AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What does it take to fix this problem? You to get off your duff and do it. No offense. *You* think there's a problem. *You* apparently think there's a solution for it. Why do you think the nebulous "they" should be out the

Re: Fonts, one more time

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There have been a number of postings about fonts over the last few > months. But the discussion seems to me to miss the point. Since this is kind of a meta-rant, a meta-answer seems to be appropriate... > If you install Windows, you don't have to know anything about

Re: Fonts, one more time

yahoo.com> writes: > What does it take to fix this problem? Help test the new Sarge installer or work on other packages to expedite its release :) Since Sarge includes Gnome 2.4 and KDE 3.x, fonts *will* look good out-of-the-box, thanks in part to the high-quality bitstream-vera set of fonts.

Re: Fonts, one more time

On Thursday 12 February 2004 05:50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you install Windows, you don't have to know > anything about fonts, really. Text just looks good in > all applications. You become aware that different > fonts exist by choosing different fonts in apps like > Office. They all look

Re: Fonts, one more time

On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:50:24AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What does it take to fix this problem? One month of solid work (that's what it took me to get all my hardware and eye candy working). Debian's "stable" philsophy means Stable predates many useful and pretty things. I expect t

Fonts, one more time

There have been a number of postings about fonts over the last few months. But the discussion seems to me to miss the point. If you install Windows, you don't have to know anything about fonts, really. Text just looks good in all applications. You become aware that different fonts exist by choosin

Re: sblive,'n debian, one more time...

* Marcus Johansson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990730 04:27]: > > > reboot or anything. then I switched to debain and tried to run the > > install script again to re-install the sound drivers (after compiling > > the proper kernel of course). the script thought everything went > > allright, but xmms (a

Re: sblive,'n debian, one more time...

Marcus Johansson wrote: > I've not tested the sb-live driver yet, havent bought a card yet, so this is > just what i've read in the driver archive. Some companies will never learn .. I do not like companies that don't suplly information to developers! The only think the users can do is NOT TO

Re: sblive,'n debian, one more time...

> reboot or anything. then I switched to debain and tried to run the > install script again to re-install the sound drivers (after compiling > the proper kernel of course). the script thought everything went > allright, but xmms (and mtv and anything else that wanted to use sound) > thought othe

sblive,'n debian, one more time...

I know that this is beating the hell out of a dead horse, but please bear with me for one more sblive question...thanks. I was running redhat 6.0 on a regular i386 with an sblive card. when I downloaded and the latest modules, they installed fine, not requireing a reboot or anything. then I switc

Re: One More Time

> 2. I want to install Linux on a Syquest EzFlyer 135, > which is supposed to be supported, but when I use the > rescue disk it only shows my hard drive. Please be more specific about your hardware. What kind og EzFlyer you have? (SCSI, IDE, parallel port), what kind of hard drive (IDE, SCSI), SCS

Re: One More Time

On Tue, Feb 24, 1998 at 07:00:28PM -0800, Robert Smith wrote: > Here is my problem: > > 1. I can not install Linux on any of my machine's > hard drives because of different reasons, but there > are no hardware problems with my machines hard > drives, RAM, procesesors, etc. > 2. I want to install L

One More Time

Here is my problem: 1. I can not install Linux on any of my machine's hard drives because of different reasons, but there are no hardware problems with my machines hard drives, RAM, procesesors, etc. 2. I want to install Linux on a Syquest EzFlyer 135, which is supposed to be supported, but when