[Blackbox]
> That begs the question. How then do I jump to the terminal if it's
> behind a number of open windows?
Use the Blackbox toolbar or keyboard shortcuts (-> bbkeys).
Ciao, Mark Weinem
les
for Perl, although I wouldn't necessarily characterize the latter as
lightweight.
- Original Message -
From: "Joris Lambrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Karsten M. Self'" ;
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:24 AM
Subject: RE: FW: OT : GUI Interface
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:02:05AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I prefer to leave raw function keys to low-level functions -- menus,
> etc.
Good point. That's why I leave F1-8 free, but the only conflict I've
had with F9/F10 has been with running MS Visual C++ over a VNC session,
which is a fl
Never used it, so YMMV
http://linuz.sns.it/~max/twin/
cheers,
damon
Quoth Joris Lambrecht,
> oh well, i'll DROP this subject, apparently there is NO reasoning possible
> on this subject
--
Damon Muller | Did a large procession wave their torches
Criminologist/Linux Geek | As my
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:26:01PM -0500, Dave Sherohman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:51:38PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:13:22AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
<...>
> > You also have various options for opening menus. By defau
Thanks, i'll look into that so i won't be the dumb ass i'm now
-Original Message-
From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 12 april 2001 1:44
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Re: FW: OT : GUI Interfaces
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 a
well don't mind me, i'm just poking at those who know in order to learn
-Original Message-
From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 12 april 2001 0:55
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Re: OT : GUI Interfaces
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001
oh well, i'll DROP this subject, apparently there is NO reasoning possible
on this subject
-Original Message-
From: Alan Shutko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 11 april 2001 22:07
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OT : GUI Interfaces
Joris Lambrecht &l
csj wrote:
> Which brings me to my favorite lite-wm peeve. Why do most of them
> lack a persistent menu/taskbar? Take Blackbox (a favorite from the
> posts I have read). To open a new app you have to click at the
> desktop (or is there some abstruse keyboard shortcut?) to bring up
> the app-rop
On Thursday 12 April 2001 08:54, John Hasler wrote:
> csj writes:
> > To open a new app you have to click at the desktop (or is there
> > some abstruse keyboard shortcut?)
>
> Yes. Type the name of the app into a terminal. Suffix a '&' if
> you don't want it to take over the terminal.
That begs
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:51:38PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:13:22AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > You missed my favorite icewm (in 3 flavors - -gnome -lite). The most
> > Windows-like wm (not counting KDE's).
>
> Legacy MS Windows is not necessarially
on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:13:22AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thursday 12 April 2001 07:44, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > WindowMaker, my preference. Gratuitous screenshots at
> > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Images/Desktop/ It's running very
> > happily on my PPro 180MHz/256MB sys
csj writes:
> To open a new app you have to click at the desktop (or is there some
> abstruse keyboard shortcut?)
Yes. Type the name of the app into a terminal. Suffix a '&' if you don't
want it to take over the terminal.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood
csj wrote:
...
> Which brings me to my favorite lite-wm peeve. Why do most of them
> lack a persistent menu/taskbar? Take Blackbox (a favorite from the
> posts I have read). To open a new app you have to click at the
> desktop (or is there some abstruse keyboard shortcut?) to bring up
> the app-rop
On Thursday 12 April 2001 07:44, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Joris Lambrecht
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > hmmm, i don't think you're missing anything, X does indeed
> > provide a graphicall shell to run a gui on, i'll have to rephrase
> > my question to, do
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Joris Lambrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> hmmm, i don't think you're missing anything, X does indeed provide a
> graphicall shell to run a gui on, i'll have to rephrase my question
> to, does anyone know a GOOD desktop that doesn't weigh a TON on an
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:42:30PM +0200, Joris Lambrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: woensdag 11 april 2001 20:31
> To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
> Subject: Re: OT : GUI Interf
Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It [X] IS a fantastic system, indeed, but it weighs on your
> computers resources.
X has run on machines so small and slow they haven't been sold in over
a decade. X also runs now on machines which can fit in the palm of
your hand.
> Also, what's th
t this is a long day
-Original Message-
From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 11 april 2001 20:31
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Re: OT : GUI Interfaces
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:20:45PM +0200, Joris Lambrecht
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> D
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:20:45PM +0200, Joris Lambrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Does anyone know of a non X GUI interface wich has a number of applications
> ported to it ? I keep wondering if X is the answer to Gui's for linux, it is
> after all a hefty piece of software to run ... This qu
ave to manually configure
your menu's, that's a plus in the windows os desktop you know
maybe i just need a good read on X and gui's ? any resource would be welcome
...
-Original Message-
From: robert bronsing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 11 april 2001 16:44
T
--
Robert Bronsing--- Begin Message ---
> Since X is, after all those years, not the most userfriendly piece of
> software i'm looking for something else, if available.
>
Hi Joris,
may I ask you what is the problem with X? I thought X only provided the
means to have a GUI (without actually b
Does anyone know of a non X GUI interface wich has a number of applications
ported to it ? I keep wondering if X is the answer to Gui's for linux, it is
after all a hefty piece of software to run ... This question comes from
reading up on AtheOS wich uses a proprietary interface wich is reportedly
23 matches
Mail list logo
