As the Subject-line says, I am using Icewm and Mozilla as my Browser.
In the _old_ days while I was still using Netscape I could change the
fonts for Netscape in .Xdefault ( or .Xresources) with a entry like
this:
Netscape*toolBar*fontList:-Adobe-Helvetica-Medium-R-Normal--10-100-75-75-P-56-ISO
I've answered a few questions and got the text visible. Details at
the bottom.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:09:08PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I'm using mozilla 1.6-5 in testing, including mozilla-xft which
> activates the xft support.
>
> Considerable chunks of the subversion.tigris.org are invis
I'm using mozilla 1.6-5 in testing, including mozilla-xft which
activates the xft support.
Considerable chunks of the subversion.tigris.org are invisible in this
browser. These are pieces formatted with .
E.g.,
http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=73&raw=true
the text of t
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:02PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
Under Preferences > Appearance > Fonts, everything is set to "Agfa
Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1" and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
Uhhh... Andale Mono *is* a monospace font. Exactly what do you expec
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:02PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
> Under Preferences > Appearance > Fonts, everything is set to "Agfa
> Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1" and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
Uhhh... Andale Mono *is* a monospace font. Exactly what do you expect to
be happening
Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
I think my fonts are screwed up in Mozilla 1.0.0...
Under Preferences > Appearance > Fonts, everything is set to "Agfa
Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1" and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
What does everyone else's fonts section have by default? I'm using
Mozilla 1.0
I think my fonts are screwed up in Mozilla 1.0.0...
Under Preferences > Appearance > Fonts, everything is set to "Agfa
Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1" and Slashdot renders in full monospace.
What does everyone else's fonts section have by default? I'm using
Mozilla 1.0.0 from a .mozilla generat
Ashish Ariga wrote:
> Turns out that Mozilla and a bunch of other GNOME/GTK2 apps use
> fonts that are configured via some fontconfig. (I don't know
> much about it.)
> fc-list reports fonts that are available through fontconfig.
> Ensure that the path where you installed the fonts are listed in
>
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:29, Ashish Ariga wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:20, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> > The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default'
> > fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for
> > tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font i
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:20, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default'
> fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for
> tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font is just called
> 'serif', the monospace font is called 'm
The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default'
fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for
tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font is just called
'serif', the monospace font is called 'monospace'.
I found that (at least on my system) these are in re
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:42:46AM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
>
>
> Ross Boylan wrote:
> >I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number
> >of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about
> >what is going on.
> >
> >1. I can't find anything that contr
Ross Boylan wrote:
I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number
of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about
what is going on.
1. I can't find anything that controls the fonts used in the browser
menu bar and menus. It looks as if the same fo
I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number
of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about
what is going on.
1. I can't find anything that controls the fonts used in the browser
menu bar and menus. It looks as if the same font may be used on
displ
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
> And I heard Miquel van Smoorenburg exclaim:
>
> > > Daniel> When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
> > > Daniel> 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
> > > Daniel> the screen (nice scaling, by
And I heard Miquel van Smoorenburg exclaim:
> > Daniel> When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
> > Daniel> 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
> > Daniel> the screen (nice scaling, by the way--not a bit blocky : ).
> If you have TrueType fonts defin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joseph Dane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Daniel" == Daniel Farnsworth Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Daniel> When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
> Daniel> 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
> Daniel
> "Daniel" == Daniel Farnsworth Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at
Daniel> 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of
Daniel> the screen (nice scaling, by the way--not a bit blocky : ).
no help here,
I hope this isn't a repeat of a problem that's been
mentioned long ago--I searched a bit in the archives
and have been watching the lists, and haven't seen
anything that looked related.
When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm
running at 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes
up the m
but can anyone remind me of the *subject*
> for upgrading to XFree 4.1 and GTK/Mozilla fonts going haywire?
> Actually it is only Gnumeric and Mozilla that have freaked out - AbiWord
> is still fine.
>
> I've searched under different combinations of GTk fonts upgrade b
Hello everybody,
I know this is an old topic, but can anyone remind me of the *subject*
for upgrading to XFree 4.1 and GTK/Mozilla fonts going haywire?
Actually it is only Gnumeric and Mozilla that have freaked out - AbiWord
is still fine.
I've searched under different combinations of GTk
Despite my having done nothing, appearance is back to normal.
(I did lots of things yesterday, but none of them had any effect.
I've since shut down and restarted the computer. I also forgot to
mention that immediately before the unpleasantness I installed
realplayer.)
Weird.
On Mon, Aug 13, 20
22 matches
Mail list logo
