Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux Debian

didier gaumet writes: > Le 07/03/2023 à 21:17, Richmond a écrit : >> I have Debian 11 on Windows Subsystem for Linux, but it is using a >> version 4 kernel. (I have established that it is debian 11 by looking in >> /etc/issue, and /etc/apt/sources). The Kernel says it is Microsoft: >> 4.4.0-19041

Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux Debian

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 08:17:41PM +, Richmond wrote: > I have Debian 11 on Windows Subsystem for Linux, but it is using a > version 4 kernel. (I have established that it is debian 11 by looking in > /etc/issue, and /etc/apt/sources). The Kernel says it is Microsoft: > > 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft

Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux Debian

Le 07/03/2023 à 21:17, Richmond a écrit : I have Debian 11 on Windows Subsystem for Linux, but it is using a version 4 kernel. (I have established that it is debian 11 by looking in /etc/issue, and /etc/apt/sources). The Kernel says it is Microsoft: 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft #2311-Microsoft So I gu

Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux Debian

Richmond writes: > Who supports Debian 11 for WSL? It is in the Microsoft Store. Why is > it on version 4 kernel? No one here knows what changes Microsoft made in the process of producing WSL or why they made them. Ask Microsoft. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Windows Subsystem for Linux Debian

I have Debian 11 on Windows Subsystem for Linux, but it is using a version 4 kernel. (I have established that it is debian 11 by looking in /etc/issue, and /etc/apt/sources). The Kernel says it is Microsoft: 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft #2311-Microsoft So I guess this is not really a kernel? as the vers

Re: installing Linux debian

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:53:02PM +, jair wey wrote: > Hello , Debian support > > i installed parrot os and later kali Linux on my usb > > when running it I get booted into the busybox ‘smbus is busy cant use it” > I tried looking for answers googling it but nothing of the solution worked >

installing Linux debian

Hello , Debian support i installed parrot os and later kali Linux on my usb when running it I get booted into the busybox ‘smbus is busy cant use it” I tried looking for answers googling it but nothing of the solution worked What should I do to solve this problem Should I also provide screensho

Re: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:45:42PM +, Wookey wrote: > On 2022-02-10 21:39 +0100, dude wrote: > > International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red Hat > > into > > airlock X-D > > > > > > https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source

Re: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)

On 2/10/22 3:39 PM, dude wrote: > > International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red > Hat into airlock X-D > > https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Red-Hat-into-airlock > > > Boldly

Re: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)

On 11/2/22 6:45 am, Wookey wrote: On 2022-02-10 21:39 +0100, dude wrote: International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red Hat into airlock X-D https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts

Re: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)

On 11/2/22 6:29 am, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:39:02 +0100 dude wrote: International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red Hat into airlock X-D https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-

Re: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)

On 2022-02-10 21:39 +0100, dude wrote: > International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red Hat into > airlock X-D > > > https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Re

Re: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:39:02 +0100 dude wrote: > > International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red > Hat into airlock X-D > > https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Red-Hat-into-airlock > >

ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)

International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops Windows & Red Hat into airlock X-D https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Red-Hat-into-airlock Boldly Going, Running Linux in Space" - Sam Bishop (LCA 2022

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

On 10/26/19 2:55 PM, deloptes wrote: Doug McGarrett wrote: You haven't said what you're going to look at, but in my humble opinion, if you only want to LOOK, not record, a binocular optical microscope with a ring light and under slide illumination option is the way to go. I don't know if a high

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

Gene Heskett wrote: > Agreed, its essentially useless for what I want to do. Way too wide a > field of view. I need an endoscope sized camera with a long lens and a > very narrow F.O.V. for mounting on a milling machine head for a video > edge finder. For this app, it needs focusing, or at least m

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

On Sunday 27 October 2019 05:32:09 deloptes wrote: > Bob Weber wrote: > > If you aren't concerned about high quality then this might be of > > interest. > > > > Jiusion 40 to 1000x Magnification Endoscope on amazon for about > > $22.  Best of all it works on linux!  No drivers needed on Debian. >

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

Bob Weber wrote: > If you aren't concerned about high quality then this might be of interest. > > Jiusion 40 to 1000x Magnification Endoscope on amazon for about $22.  Best > of all it works on linux!  No drivers needed on Debian. No, please, I am interested in quality. I prefer paying a bit mor

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

On 10/26/19 5:55 PM, deloptes wrote: Doug McGarrett wrote: You haven't said what you're going to look at, but in my humble opinion, if you only want to LOOK, not record, a binocular optical microscope with a ring light and under slide illumination option is the way to go. I don't know if a high

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

On 10/26/2019 05:55 PM, deloptes wrote: Doug McGarrett wrote: You haven't said what you're going to look at, but in my humble opinion, if you only want to LOOK, not record, a binocular optical microscope with a ring light and under slide illumination option is the way to go. I don't know if

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

Doug McGarrett wrote: > You haven't said what you're going to look at, but in my humble opinion, > if you only want to LOOK, not record, a binocular optical microscope > with a ring light and under slide illumination option is the way to go. > I don't know if a high magnification microscope like y

Re: Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

Req. 400x zoom is OK, but I saw also one with 500 price <=200,- stand alone and PC use (implies display and USB) not hand held linux (debian) support Questions the few I had a look at say they support AV out. What does it mean? is

Good advice on Linux (debian) compatible microscope

one with 500 price <=200,- stand alone and PC use (implies display and USB) not hand held linux (debian) support Questions the few I had a look at say they support AV out. What does it mean? is the quality good enough? does such one supports a

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On 2019-04-12 16:11, Celejar wrote: On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 07:54:57 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: mick crane wrote: > I have wondered what they do to stop people broadcasting their own top level > domain. Nothing. They don't have to. If you want a top level domain and you control your own nameservers

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 07:54:57 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: > mick crane wrote: > > I have wondered what they do to stop people broadcasting their own top level > > domain. > > Nothing. They don't have to. > > If you want a top level domain and you control your own > nameservers, you've got it. > >

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 mick crane wrote: > On 2019-04-12 13:31, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Friday 12 April 2019 07:54:57 Dan Ritter wrote: >>> [...] >>> This can actually be useful: you can define .crane for use >>> within your house, and now you have names that nobody else

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On 2019-04-12 13:31, Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 12 April 2019 07:54:57 Dan Ritter wrote: mick crane wrote: > I have wondered what they do to stop people broadcasting their own > top level domain. Nothing. They don't have to. If you want a top level domain and you control your own nameserve

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Friday 12 April 2019 07:54:57 Dan Ritter wrote: > mick crane wrote: > > I have wondered what they do to stop people broadcasting their own > > top level domain. > > Nothing. They don't have to. > > If you want a top level domain and you control your own > nameservers, you've got it. > > But nob

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

mick crane wrote: > I have wondered what they do to stop people broadcasting their own top level > domain. Nothing. They don't have to. If you want a top level domain and you control your own nameservers, you've got it. But nobody else is likely to query your nameservers about it, so it won't b

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 mick crane wrote: > On 2019-04-12 10:57, Dan Purgert wrote: >> mick crane wrote: >>> On 2019-04-11 17:16, mick crane wrote: On 2019-04-11 17:05, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:02:46PM +0100, mick crane wrote: >> I thin

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On 2019-04-12 10:57, Dan Purgert wrote: mick crane wrote: On 2019-04-11 17:16, mick crane wrote: On 2019-04-11 17:05, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:02:46PM +0100, mick crane wrote: I think that is what dynamic ip address services do, change the ipaddress but the service has

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 mick crane wrote: > On 2019-04-11 17:16, mick crane wrote: >> On 2019-04-11 17:05, Greg Wooledge wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:02:46PM +0100, mick crane wrote: I think that is what dynamic ip address services do, change the ipaddre

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On 2019-04-11 17:16, mick crane wrote: On 2019-04-11 17:05, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:02:46PM +0100, mick crane wrote: I think that is what dynamic ip address services do, change the ipaddress but the service has to be on the ISP's router ? Do I understand correctly then

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 00:42 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:34:30AM +0200, Jan Claeys wrote: > > Why not use a dynamic DNS provider? > > > > > Primarily because it wouldn't solve my problem. IIUC it would allow > me to map a domain name to the IP address assigned to my ho

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On 2019-04-11 17:05, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:02:46PM +0100, mick crane wrote: I think that is what dynamic ip address services do, change the ipaddress but the service has to be on the ISP's router ? Do I understand correctly then when your isp/home address changes your

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:34:30AM +0200, Jan Claeys wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 21:33 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > I've created a very simple script that is capable of parsing the > > > output of "ip addr" and comparing the returned ip address for the > > > releva

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:51:44AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:42:12AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > Why not use a dynamic DNS provider? > > > The problem is how I know that the IP > > address has changed and hence the DNS mapping needs updating. > > By doing it

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 05:02:46PM +0100, mick crane wrote: > I think that is what dynamic ip address services do, change the ipaddress > but the service has to be on the ISP's router ? > Do I understand correctly then when your isp/home address changes your box > broadcasts its domain new address

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On 2019-04-11 16:42, Mark Fletcher wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:34:30AM +0200, Jan Claeys wrote: On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 21:33 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > I've created a very simple script that is capable of parsing the > output of "ip addr" and comparing the returned ip address for the > r

RESOLVED: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:14:33PM +0100, Thomas Pircher wrote: > Mark Fletcher wrote: > > mutt won't let me go back and edit the subject line. > > Hi Mark, > > > Short version: Is it reasonable to expect a piece of software to exist > > that establishes a direct connection to a "remote" MTA and

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:42:12AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > Why not use a dynamic DNS provider? > The problem is how I know that the IP > address has changed and hence the DNS mapping needs updating. By doing it correctly. has an example for Debian

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:34:30AM +0200, Jan Claeys wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 21:33 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > I've created a very simple script that is capable of parsing the > > output of "ip addr" and comparing the returned ip address for the > > relevant interface to a stored ip addr

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On 08.04.19 17:43, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:33:03PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > Hello all > > > > As I wrote this I began to consider this is slightly OT for this list; > > my apologies for not putting OT in the subject line but mutt won't let > > me go back and e

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 21:33 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > I've created a very simple script that is capable of parsing the > output of "ip addr" and comparing the returned ip address for the > relevant interface to a stored ip address, and thus being able to > tell if the IP address has changed. Wh

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:14:33 +0100 Thomas Pircher wrote: > Mark Fletcher wrote: > > mutt won't let me go back and edit the subject line. > > Hi Mark, > > FYI, mutt does allow you to change the Subject line, in the Compose > Menu, just before sending the mail. > > > Short version: Is it reasonab

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:33:03PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > Hello all > > As I wrote this I began to consider this is slightly OT for this list; > my apologies for not putting OT in the subject line but mutt won't let > me go back and edit the subject line. Mutt can do that, too. To send v

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:39:35PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:33:03 +0900 > Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > > > My image of an ideal solution is a piece of software that can present > > email to a remote MTA (ie an MTA not on the local machine) for > > delivery, but is not itself a

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:14:33PM +0100, Thomas Pircher wrote: > Mark Fletcher wrote: > > mutt won't let me go back and edit the subject line. > > Hi Mark, > > Yes, have a look at the dma or nullmailer packages. There used to be > more of these programs in Debian (ssmtp, for example), but on my

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:33:03 +0900 Mark Fletcher wrote: > > My image of an ideal solution is a piece of software that can present > email to a remote MTA (ie an MTA not on the local machine) for > delivery, but is not itself an MTA, and certainly has no capability > to listen for incoming mail.

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 07:54:30AM -0500, Ryan Nowakowski wrote: > You might check out sSMTP[1] > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/sSMTP > Thanks, looks like sSMTP will do the job. As was pointed out elsewhere in the thread, it seems to have been dropped from Buster, but that is no barrier for me

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

You might check out sSMTP[1] [1] https://wiki.debian.org/sSMTP On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:33:03PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote: > Hello all > > As I wrote this I began to consider this is slightly OT for this list; > my apologies for not putting OT in the subject line but mutt won't let > me go

Re: Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

Mark Fletcher wrote: > mutt won't let me go back and edit the subject line. Hi Mark, FYI, mutt does allow you to change the Subject line, in the Compose Menu, just before sending the mail. > Short version: Is it reasonable to expect a piece of software to exist > that establishes a direct connec

Simple Linux to Linux(Debian) email

Hello all As I wrote this I began to consider this is slightly OT for this list; my apologies for not putting OT in the subject line but mutt won't let me go back and edit the subject line. Short version: Is it reasonable to expect a piece of software to exist that establishes a direct connect

Re: how i can instal programe to linux Debian ? thank you

> usually (as root on a system): > > # apt-get install > > will do everything needed. depending upon the > package you may have to configure some things > after it is installed. > > if you do not know the name of the package you > can use search the package list for keywords to > see

Re: how i can instal programe to linux Debian ? thank you

Saber Lalam wrote: which program? usually (as root on a system): # apt-get install will do everything needed. depending upon the package you may have to configure some things after it is installed. if you do not know the name of the package you can use search the package list for ke

how i can instal programe to linux Debian ? thank you

Re: Fwd: Error in Linux Debian

On 2016-09-23 19:41, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello Juan, welcome to Debian. Your question is a Debian User question, so I redirect it to the debian-user list. Best, Jerome Forwarded Message Subject:Error in Linux Debian Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:17:56 -0300 From

Fwd: Error in Linux Debian

Hello Juan, welcome to Debian. Your question is a Debian User question, so I redirect it to the debian-user list. Best, Jerome Forwarded Message Subject:Error in Linux Debian Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:17:56 -0300 From: Juan Carlos Cangiano To: calcu

Re: Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely

Hi. On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:00:53PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Another 'persona' Mr Naturist Linux? Mail headers from <20140303074232.529c2...@m0005296.ppops.net> show us that: Received: from imta-35.everyone.net (imta-35.everyone.net [216.200.145.35])

Re: Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely

On 3/4/14, Arnold Bird wrote: > Russia is more traditionally minded these days, it looks like from the > outside. > USA is flip collar up, damn the consequences, individuals have no meaning > (collateral damage (aka reckless and willful murder)), fuck the past, kinda > asshole thinking. > > I hope

Re: Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely

Russia is more traditionally minded these days, it looks like from the outside. USA is flip collar up, da*n the consequences, individuals have no meaning (collateral damage (aka reckless and willful murder)), f*k the past, kinda as*h*le thinking. I hope russians would not wish to jump into a hole

Re: Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely

debian for 13 years and see what has happened for what it is. --- recovery...@gmail.com wrote: From: Reco To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely Date: Mon, 3 Mar

Re: Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely

On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:42:32 -0800 "Arnold Bird" wrote: > Would it be possible for russia to maintain a classic > debian linux distribution and let the american and their > controled european employees to waddle into the morass > of systemd? You're putting it wrong way. Everyone knows that in Sov

Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely

Arnold Bird writes: > Would it be possible for russia to maintain a classic > debian linux distribution It would support the kremvax architecture but have some nietwork problems -- /\ ___Ubuntu: ancient /___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_

Could russians maintain a traditional linux debian? Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likely

Would it be possible for russia to maintain a classicdebian linux distribution and let the american and theircontroled european employees to waddle into the morassof systemd?Linus is half bought and paied for too, he uses fedora withall the mess. He was asked if he was asked to put in abackdoor int

Re: linux debian

On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 16:05 +, darkestkhan wrote: > $ sudo aptitude update ; sudo aptitude install flashplugin-nonfree Is aptitude installed by default? If not, aptitude can be replaced with apt-get. It might be helpful to install Synaptic first and then to use Synaptic in the future, to ins

Re: linux debian

It is actually quite easy - edit your /etc/apt/sources.list so that it contains line (you have to be root to do so (or use sudo)): deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free # [ftp address may be slightly different depending on your preferences] And then you just: $ sudo aptitude

Re: linux debian

On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 12:55 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > If you manually downloaded a .deb you can install it by > > su > cd /path/to/the/downloaded/package.deb > dpkg -i package.deb For a default Ubuntu (and perhaps for current default Debian installs too) sudo -i cd /path/to/the/downloaded/pac

Re: linux debian

There was a typo that could confuse a newbie, so I correct only this typo: > It might be, that your repositories list doesn't include "non-free", > then apt-get etc. don't have access to _repositories_ that provide > proprietary packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d

Re: linux debian

On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 11:17 +0100, larry mckenna wrote: > hi ralph, thnaks for getting back ! why can i not install packages > after downloading them or can you suggest software package that will > open flash player up please ? larry mc kenna. It might be, that your repositories list doesn't inclu

Re: linux debian

On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 05:09 +0100, larry mckenna wrote: > i looked through your soft ware packagwe list and found a strong snob > tech speak for nerds why can you not be so eliist and name things the > ordinary 5/8 th can read ? You could use synaptic to search for software, e.g. by the keyword "b

linux debian

hi folks, finding myself in limbo directly downloaded debian only to find i need flash player can download flash but can't install ! also tried to download other version of ubuntu and it downloads but get address not recognised or soft ware needs to be installed to allow install ! i looked through

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

get the maximum resolution supported by > >my screen. Greetings, I installed some high-end Nvidia cards on LInux (Debian and Ubuntu) lately, While I don't have the names and models handy, those models had perfect support , the drivers were up-to-date and showed full utilization of the hardw

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

Hello again, It turns out that the problem was not having the proper driver for my i3 processor's integrated graphics. I had the drivers for a previous processor versions and after this upgrade, I get the maximum resolution supported by my screen. On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:40:03 PM UTC+5:3

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On 15/07/12 09:17 AM, Ivo Ugrina wrote: On 07/12/2012 03:04 PM, Gary Dale wrote: On 12/07/12 04:58 AM, Ivo Ugrina wrote: I've bought ATI 6750 a few months ago and I'm not satisfied with FLOSS driver. I can't suspend anymore. The card simply won't shut down. Did you file a bug report for it? N

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On 07/12/2012 03:04 PM, Gary Dale wrote: > On 12/07/12 04:58 AM, Ivo Ugrina wrote: >> I've bought ATI 6750 a few months ago >> and I'm not satisfied with FLOSS driver. >> I can't suspend anymore. The card simply >> won't shut down. > Did you file a bug report for it? Nope :( I've solved it with d

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On Jo, 12 iul 12, 19:40:33, Gary Dale wrote: > On 12/07/12 06:41 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >On Jo, 12 iul 12, 09:04:48, Gary Dale wrote: > >>On 12/07/12 04:58 AM, Ivo Ugrina wrote: > >>>I've bought ATI 6750 a few months ago > >>>and I'm not satisfied with FLOSS driver. > >>>I can't suspend anymor

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On 12/07/12 06:41 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Jo, 12 iul 12, 09:04:48, Gary Dale wrote: On 12/07/12 04:58 AM, Ivo Ugrina wrote: I've bought ATI 6750 a few months ago and I'm not satisfied with FLOSS driver. I can't suspend anymore. The card simply won't shut down. Did you file a bug report fo

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On Jo, 12 iul 12, 09:04:48, Gary Dale wrote: > On 12/07/12 04:58 AM, Ivo Ugrina wrote: > >I've bought ATI 6750 a few months ago > >and I'm not satisfied with FLOSS driver. > >I can't suspend anymore. The card simply > >won't shut down. > Did you file a bug report for it? > > I've found the Debian

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On 12/07/12 04:58 AM, Ivo Ugrina wrote: I've bought ATI 6750 a few months ago and I'm not satisfied with FLOSS driver. I can't suspend anymore. The card simply won't shut down. Did you file a bug report for it? I've found the Debian package maintainers to be quite eager to work with people to

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

I've bought ATI 6750 a few months ago and I'm not satisfied with FLOSS driver. I can't suspend anymore. The card simply won't shut down. -- Ivo Ugrina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 00:35 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 11 iul 12, 18:04:24, aditya menon wrote: > > > > Thank you for your detailed reply. The main reason I want Graphics card > > support on Linux is that I want a high resolution to work with. The > > integrated card offers atrocious su

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On Mi, 11 iul 12, 18:04:24, aditya menon wrote: > > Thank you for your detailed reply. The main reason I want Graphics card > support on Linux is that I want a high resolution to work with. The > integrated card offers atrocious support for resolution (only 800x600). I seriously doubt that. Would

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

Thank you, *everyone*, for the very helpful and detailed replies! I am much more confident of that chip now. Looks like "it's a Buy" ;D On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:30:05 +0530, aditya menon wrote: > > > I'm planning to get a new computer, and the on

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:30:05 +0530, aditya menon wrote: > I'm planning to get a new computer, and the one I really like is an > All-in-one from Lenovo with *ATI HD 6450 *graphics. Does anyone have > experience with that? I made a huge mistake last time by getting an > nVidia Optimus card, it turne

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On 11/07/12 09:07 AM, aditya menon wrote: Okay, thanks again... I'll research more again if the card is supported (and whether I can get extended VGA standards) :) AMD/ATI make proprietary drivers for their cards. However for many cards, the open source drivers work as well or better. The rade

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

Okay, thanks again... I'll research more again if the card is supported (and whether I can get extended VGA standards) :) On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > If a card isn't supported, than usually the open source vesa > > driver does work without 3D acceleration and only wit

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

> If a card isn't supported, than usually the open source vesa > driver does work without 3D acceleration and only with a limited > resolution, take a look at (extended) vesa standards. Oops, (extended) VGA standards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 18:04 +0530, aditya menon wrote: > So the summary would be that "there are open source drivers available, > they do work, but I may be violating licences" - am I right? You aren't. Pardon for my broken English. Open source drivers don't violate any license. A combination of

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

Hi Ralf, Sorry about the formatting, I'll keep it plain from now on =) Thank you for your detailed reply. The main reason I want Graphics card support on Linux is that I want a high resolution to work with. The integrated card offers atrocious support for resolution (only 800x600). So the summar

Re: Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 17:30 +0530, aditya menon wrote: > All-in-one from Lenovo with ATI I bought a mobo with an integrated ATI that as separated card has got proprietary driver support, but the integrated thingy only worked with the FLOSS driver, without 3D acceleration. The manual does call it

Do ATI HD cards have good working drivers for Linux (Debian Squeeze in particular)

Hello everyone, I'm planning to get a new computer, and the one I really like is an All-in-one from Lenovo with *ATI HD 6450 *graphics. Does anyone have experience with that? I made a huge mistake last time by getting an nVidia Optimus card, it turned out that neither Linux nor many games work pro

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

Always two minutes with fsck check take it a few seconds longer. I can send logs but which one can be helpful? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1339443

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

On 2012-06-10, Marcin Sławiński wrote: > I got CPU 2.66Ghz (32 bit, one core, 64bit compatyble) and 752MB RAM > (DDR333, single channel). System boots up in two minutes. Even I don't > what I should services down to speed up. Even on duo2core with 4GB of > memory is not working too fast. 1 minute

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 14:20 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:29:03 +0200, Marcin Sławiński wrote: > > [snip] I mean, most things (like > >> booting, menus, windows, effects) are very fast. > > > I got CPU 2.66Ghz (32 bit, one core, 64bit compatyble) and 752MB RAM > > (DDR333, singl

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:29:03 +0200, Marcin Sławiński wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 20:58 +, Camaleón wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:55:51 +0200, Marcin Sławiński wrote: >> >> > What exactly Linux Debian with gnome 3 has hardware requirements to >> > works

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

On Du, 10 iun 12, 17:47:00, Gary Dale wrote: > > > Are you running Debian/Squeeze or Wheezy? Stable/Squeeze uses the > older init system which starts things in sequence instead of in > parallel. Nope. It runs things in sequence only if the conversion to dependency based boot failed. Kind regard

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 05:47:00PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote: > Are you running Debian/Squeeze or Wheezy? Stable/Squeeze uses the > older init system which starts things in sequence instead of in > parallel. I believe Wheezy is moving toward a more modern startup > system. Already available! I've tri

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:08:28 +0200, Marcin wrote in message <1339366108.2085.9.camel@Mint-Desktop>: > I installed Squeeze in august 2010, when squeeze was a testing distro. > Now after dist-upgrades I got Wheezy, so I am using testing distro. > There was time when I mixed repo from wheezy and squ

Re: Recommend System requirements for Linux Debian

Ubuntu (both 10.04 and 12.04) and Mint 13 starts up from grub to window login in 30 seconds. On Debian I need to wait about one minute. I am not talking Debian is bad OS. This is good OS, maybe not for amateurs. This is good system, and my system fucked up. On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 23:18 +0100, Lisi

  1   2   3   4   >