Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread Lord Khaos
you don't know, stay with 2.4.21, which is quite fast and has all the hardware support I've ever had need of. " - Original Message - From: "Oki DZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:39 AM Subject: Kernel 2.5.44

Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 01:39, Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version > 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils? > > TIA, > Oki Well, it is a substantively old development kernel that has been largely superseded by later develop

Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread aradorlinux
On 27 Jun 2003 12:39:05 +0700 Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version > 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils? You should be aware that 2.5 is a development kernel, you should update to the latest, 2.5.73

Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread Nathan Poznick
Thus spake Oki DZ: > Hi, > > Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version > 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils? You really might want to consider using a more recent version, the current development kernel is 2.5.73 As far as modules, you'll need to i

Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-28 Thread Oki DZ
Hi, Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils? TIA, Oki -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]