On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 01:51:11PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
>
> Good afternoon
> I do ask for one year at many places also computer shops
> but there is still panic during booting .
>
> Somebody here who has an idea
> where else I can ask?
>
> Regards
>
Good afternoon
I do ask for one year at many places also computer shops
but there is still panic during booting .
Somebody here who has an idea
where else I can ask?
Regards
Thank You
Sophie
with a phone and give us
the text of the error message.
Andy
amaca...@debian.org
>
>
> Von: to...@tuxteam.de
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2023 12:28
> Bis: Schwibinger Michael
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Panic again an
Sophie
Von: to...@tuxteam.de
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2023 12:28
Bis: Schwibinger Michael
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: Panic again any idea
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:49:21AM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good morning
> I did ask one ye
utions for uploading images to forums.
ibb.co
Regards
Sophie
Von: Andrew M.A. Cater
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2023 16:12
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Panic again any idea III some URLs
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 02:24:39PM
Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good morning
> I did ask one year ago
> but no answer here or in the www.
> Debian has panic(=no booting) after update to 11.
> Thank You for help
>
> Regards
> Sophie
>
Boot from a rescue disk and look at the logs, or take a photograph of
the screen when the error occu
On 20/10/2023 14:20, CL wrote:
Hallo again Michael or Sophie or whatever,
it seems your are back and made a new attempt of trolling us.
Right?
I blacklisted it (him her?), no reason to waste my time reading its
posts. They are going straight to the bin via Thunderbird filtering.
--
With kind
Am 17.10.23 um 10:49 schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
Good morning
I did ask one year ago
but no answer here or in the www.
Debian has panic(=no booting) after update to 11.
Thank You for help
Regards
Sophie
Hallo again Michael or Sophie or whatever,
it seems your are back and made a new attempt
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 02:24:39PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
>
> I did find this URLs in the www,
> but I cant understand.
Kernel panic can have many reasons.
If you don't tell us the reason for your kernel panic we can not help you.
> Can somebody help?
If you help us we can help you.
> https://www.liainfraservices.com/blog/how-to-solve-kernel-panic-error-in-linux/
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: Marco M.
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2023 12:28
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Panic again any idea
>
/
Von: Marco M.
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2023 12:28
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: Panic again any idea
Am 17.10.2023 um 08:49:21 Uhr schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
> Debian has panic(=no booting) after update to 11.
You have to give m
On 17/10/2023 09:49, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
Good morning
I did ask one year ago
but no answer here or in the www.
Debian has panic(=no booting) after update to 11.
No idea.
Thank You for help
No problem. Take care.
Regards
Sophie
--
With kindest regards, Piotr
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:49:21AM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Good morning
> I did ask one year ago
> but no answer here or in the www.
> Debian has panic(=no booting) after update to 11.
> Thank You for help
Please write *EXACTLY* error message here.
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PG
Am 17.10.2023 um 08:49:21 Uhr schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
> Debian has panic(=no booting) after update to 11.
You have to give more details.
What exactly does the text on the screen say?
Good morning
I did ask one year ago
but no answer here or in the www.
Debian has panic(=no booting) after update to 11.
Thank You for help
Regards
Sophie
On Tue, 9 May 2023 15:04:19 +
Schwibinger Michael wrote:
Hello Schwibinger,
>the printer is not printing.
>
>Is this a better explanation?
No.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}"
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent"
gards
Sophie
Von: rhkra...@gmail.com
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2023 13:08
An: Schwibinger Michael
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Was it a good idea to buy an Epson printer?
Intentionally replying off list and top posting:
Are you a real (flesh and blood, human) person or
On 03/05/2023 16:34, Nicolas George wrote:
Schwibinger Michael (12023-05-03):
What do I do wrong?
...> - Using 0x65 0x57 0x3A 0x20 instead of 0x52 0x65 0x3A 0x20 as a reply
marker in the subject.
I do not think it has any significance. It may be tricky to configure
locale of mail client
Schwibinger Michael (12023-05-08):
> Thank You
Do not thank and at the same time rudely ignore the advice given to you.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Good morning
Thank You
What does mean:
- Using 0x65 0x57 0x3A 0x20
Regards
Sophie
Von: Nicolas George
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2023 09:34
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Was it a good idea to buy an Epson printer?
Schwibinger Michael
Nobody bumped this thread today so here goes 🤣
On Wed, May 3, 2023, 5:35 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Schwibinger Michael (12023-05-03):
> > What do I do wrong?
>
> Among other things, what you are doing wrong:
>
> - Top posting.
>
> - Using 0x65 0x57 0x3A 0x20 instead of 0x52 0x65 0x3A 0x20 a
Schwibinger Michael (12023-05-03):
> What do I do wrong?
Among other things, what you are doing wrong:
- Top posting.
- Using 0x65 0x57 0x3A 0x20 instead of 0x52 0x65 0x3A 0x20 as a reply
marker in the subject.
--
Nicolas George
Good Morning
Thank You.
Print setting is saying:
Epson Ecotank.
What do I do wrong?
Regards
Sophie
Von: Andrew M.A. Cater
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Mai 2023 17:42
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Was it a good idea to buy an Epson printer?
On
ll printer.
>
>
> Regards
> Sophie
>
>
>
> Von: Andrew M.A. Cater
> Gesendet: Montag, 24. April 2023 21:41
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Was it a good idea to buy an Epson printer?
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023
Good afternoon
Thank You for help.
Its Debian 11 LXDE
I did not find a button:
Install printer.
Regards
Sophie
Von: Andrew M.A. Cater
Gesendet: Montag, 24. April 2023 21:41
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: Was it a good idea to buy an Epson
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 01:36:24PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
>
>
> Good afternoon
>
> Thank You
> Was it a good idea to buy EPSON?
>
> Regards
> Sophie
>
Good evening, Sophie
Many printers can be supported in Debian: one way or another we should be
able
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 04:36:11PM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Is it a good idea to upgrade all packages to backports?
No. What is your goal?
The backports suite is meant for specific packages and their
dependencies. Packages in backports typically have fewer users and less
test
Andy Smith wrote:
>> Except for people aging and dying I didn't understand any
>> of this post ...
>
> I'm happy to explain any part of it that you were not able
> to understand, but you'll have to be more specific.
No, I understand now, as a blueprint for a human to read as
well, not just parsab
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 02:46:49AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Except for people aging and dying I didn't understand any of
> this post ...
I'm happy to explain any part of it that you were not able to
understand, but you'll have to be more specific.
I must have been very unclear indeed
Andy Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 08:05:28AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > For a single user's machine, it's unlikely to be rewarding
> > except intellectually.
[good arguments snipped]
> There have honestly been times in my life where I've had to look at
> something set up by someone w
Andy Smith wrote:
>> For a single user's machine, it's unlikely to be rewarding
>> except intellectually.
>
> It is however a great way to document a system for those
> that don't get around to making free text notes.
> The language of the configuration management tool both does
> the setup and do
Dan Ritter wrote:
> That's just knowing what packages you want to install.
What do you mean, what else are you supposed to know?
>>>
>>> Examples [...]
>>
>> Okay, right, no here we're only concerned with the state of
>> the OS in terms of packages that are installed so that they
>
Hello,
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 08:05:28AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> For a single user's machine, it's unlikely to be rewarding
> except intellectually.
It is however a great way to document a system for those that don't
get around to making free text notes. The language of the
configuration mana
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> >>> That's just knowing what packages you want to install.
> >>
> >> What do you mean, what else are you supposed to know?
> >
> > Examples:
>
> Okay, right, no here we're only concerned with the state of
> the OS in terms of packages that are install
Dan Ritter wrote:
>>> That's just knowing what packages you want to install.
>>
>> What do you mean, what else are you supposed to know?
>
> Examples:
>
> - you have installed a load balancer; it needs
> a configuration file to work.
>
> - you have installed bind or unbound to provide DNS, they
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > That's just knowing what packages you want to install.
>
> What do you mean, what else are you supposed to know?
Examples:
- you have installed a load balancer; it needs a configuration
file to work.
- you have installed bind or unbound to provide
Dan Ritter wrote:
> That's just knowing what packages you want to install.
What do you mean, what else are you supposed to know?
> If that's all you want, you can use dpkg --set-selections
> and a text list.
What about using the interactive commands?
sudo apt-get -qq update
sudo apt-get in
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> >>> You can do it with puppet, chef, ansible, salt...
> >>>
> >>> You can go further into it with guix and nix.
> >>>
> >>> It can be quite a lot of work
> >>
> >> Okay, but why so, since it looks like the task to be done
> >> is just a config file th
;s nothing wrong with it.
Any idea how that would look? I mean the feh-zsh list.
> There is a term "Configuration as code"
To me it's just a configuration file like all software has or
should have (like a man page and --help and --version
options), that's the first step, if
>
>
> Noninteractive is the word! Thank you.
>
>
This is a technical term covered by debconf(7) :)
https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/debconf-doc/debconf.7.en.html
The idea is covered here:
https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/debconf-doc/debconf-devel.7.en.html
With a
Dan Ritter wrote:
>>> You can do it with puppet, chef, ansible, salt...
>>>
>>> You can go further into it with guix and nix.
>>>
>>> It can be quite a lot of work
>>
>> Okay, but why so, since it looks like the task to be done
>> is just a config file that's iterated by a script and
>> boiled d
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > You can do it with puppet, chef, ansible, salt...
> >
> > You can go further into it with guix and nix.
> >
> > It can be quite a lot of work
>
> Okay, but why so, since it looks like the task to be done is
> just a config file that's iterated by a
bviously people can call it declarative if the like to,
maybe a fancy word like that is what it takes to promote it.
Now why every that would be needed, since it's such a basic
idea (the config file) and it's present for everything else
already ... but evidently.
Anyway how does that work
Mike Kupfer wrote:
> I have half of that, sort of. A static file has 1 package
> name per line, and each line has a usage tag like "base",
> "dev", or "emacs-build", and distro tags, like "deb10" or
> "f25". I run a script, telling it the usage and distro, and
> it spits out a list of packages. I
Dan Ritter wrote:
> You can do it with puppet, chef, ansible, salt...
>
> You can go further into it with guix and nix.
>
> It can be quite a lot of work
Okay, but why so, since it looks like the task to be done is
just a config file that's iterated by a script and boiled down
to suitable comman
his blog post and program:
>
> Managing OpenBSD installed packages declaratively
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2022-05-05-openbsd-declarative-packages-with-pkgset.html
>
> That's sure one idea, to have a config file (that's the
> "declarative" part) and
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Have a look at this blog post and program:
>
> Managing OpenBSD installed packages declaratively
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2022-05-05-openbsd-declarative-packages-with-pkgset.html
>
> That's sure one idea, to have a config file (that&
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:10 PM Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Have a look at this blog post and program:
>
> Managing OpenBSD installed packages declaratively
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2022-05-05-openbsd-declarative-packages-with-pkgset.html
>
> That's sure one i
Mike Kupfer wrote:
>> Have a look at this blog post and program:
>>
>> Managing OpenBSD installed packages declaratively
>>
>> https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2022-05-05-openbsd-declarative-packages-with-pkgset.html
>>
>> [...] Anyone has that for Debian and Debian-like systems?
>
> I have hal
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Have a look at this blog post and program:
>
> Managing OpenBSD installed packages declaratively
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2022-05-05-openbsd-declarative-packages-with-pkgset.html
[...]
> Anyone has that for Debian and Debian-like systems?
I have half of that,
> Anyone has that for Debian and Debian-like systems?
Or, to be exact, systems that use APT.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Have a look at this blog post and program:
Managing OpenBSD installed packages declaratively
https://dataswamp.org/~solene/2022-05-05-openbsd-declarative-packages-with-pkgset.html
That's sure one idea, to have a config file (that's the
"declarative" part) and then a
Oops: Forgot to hit "Reply List" on a reply I'd intended to be public.
My bad.
Dan Ritter and "deloptes" both advised me to put the "Auxiliary" drive's
mount point someplace other than /media.
When I finally had a chance to do so late yesterday afternoon, that
solved the problem.
I never w
James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> What can I do about these things?
use a different mount point
/media is used for auto mounting
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 08:35:27AM -0700, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> The box I've been reconfiguring over the past few weeks has a hardware RAID
> controller card, with one mirrored (RAID 1) pair on it at the time of
> installation. Over the weekend, I plugged two more drives into the two empty
>
The box I've been reconfiguring over the past few weeks has a hardware
RAID controller card, with one mirrored (RAID 1) pair on it at the time
of installation. Over the weekend, I plugged two more drives into the
two empty sockets, to create a second mirrored pair, which shows up in
Linux as "s
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 23:39:01 +0100 Lisi Reisz sent:
> On Monday 29 August 2016 22:44:52 deloptes wrote:
> > Crazy but fact. IMHO people try to convince themself it will never
> > happen (to them). I would like to know why and how one could deal
> > with such line of argumentation.
>
> You can't
On Monday 29 August 2016 22:44:52 deloptes wrote:
> Crazy but fact. IMHO people try to convince themself it will never happen
> (to them). I would like to know why and how one could deal with such line
> of argumentation.
You can't. I live with it! I now just say: please, please, please, if you
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> I don't get why everyone wants to argue that a problem that is known
> to be bad and is fixed in the kernel versions released by the kernel
> maintainers should be ignored.
I'm asking myself the same, but I'm not psychotherapist to be able to
answer.
For instance a fact:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:30:11 +0200 "Thomas Schmitt"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Normally security things are pushed right on thru particularly
> > when they are a one file changed in the whole kernel source
> > tree. Why not this time?
>
> I guess because it is easy to work arou
Hi,
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Normally security things are pushed right on thru particularly
> when they are a one file changed in the whole kernel source tree. Why
> not this time?
I guess because it is easy to work around
https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/challengeack
and th
On Monday 29 August 2016 12:11:27 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:55:03 +0100 Tixy wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 15:36 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200 Frederic Marchal
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Even if the requirements are met, the attac
ernel/linux.git/commit/?h=wheezy-security&id=f383788fb866fc61daf26836bccd92ebf7a6f02f
Very cool. Any idea when the actual release by the security people
might be?
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:55:03 +0100 Tixy wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 15:36 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200 Frederic Marchal
> [...]
> > >
> > > Even if the requirements are met, the attack fails if the
> > > client is protected by a stateful firewall (eit
On Sun, 2016-08-28 at 15:36 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200 Frederic Marchal
[...]
> >
> > Even if the requirements are met, the attack fails if the client is
> > protected by a stateful firewall (either on a NAT router, modem or
> > computer).
>
> So essential
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:08:45AM -0400, Neal P. Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:43:15 +
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> > Version 4.7 of the kernel contains a fix, which only required changes to
> > one source file, so I assume it's a question of back porting that fix into
> > the Je
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:43:15 +
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Version 4.7 of the kernel contains a fix, which only required changes to
> one source file, so I assume it's a question of back porting that fix into
> the Jessie version of the kernel. I might take a look at trying that and
> submit a pat
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 at 10:21, Neal P. Murphy
wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200
> Frederic Marchal wrote:
>
> > The attack is also useless if the attacker can't spoof the source IP
> > address. Routers in corporate environments usually block this by design
> or
> > due to VLAN. For that
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200
Frederic Marchal wrote:
> The attack is also useless if the attacker can't spoof the source IP
> address. Routers in corporate environments usually block this by design or
> due to VLAN. For that reason, the attack can't come from the same LAN to
> bypass the
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> The hole needs to be fixed.
AMEN
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:35:01 +0200 Frederic Marchal
wrote:
> The requirements are:
>
> * TCP connection,
> * long-lived,
> * unencrypted,
> * long silences.
>
> I'll add that the protocol must allow the server to initiate data
> sending with only one packet (such as news pushed from the server
>
On Friday 26 August 2016 23:11:23 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:06:15 +0200 Frederic Marchal
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday 26 August 2016 11:04:04 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > > According to:
> > >
> > > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5696
> > >
> > > Wheezy a
"John T. Haggerty" writes:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Perry E. Metzger
> wrote:
>
>On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:06:15 +0200 Frederic Marchal
> wrote:
>
> > The download must be long
> > enough (more than one minute) for the attacker to discover the
> set
> > of paramete
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Perry E. Metzger
wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:06:15 +0200 Frederic Marchal
> wrote:
> > On Friday 26 August 2016 11:04:04 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > > According to:
> > >
> > > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5696
> > >
> > > Wheezy and J
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:06:15 +0200 Frederic Marchal
wrote:
> On Friday 26 August 2016 11:04:04 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > According to:
> >
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5696
> >
> > Wheezy and Jessie are still vulnerable. The attack in question is
> > kind of bad (it
On Friday 26 August 2016 11:04:04 Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> According to:
>
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5696
>
> Wheezy and Jessie are still vulnerable. The attack in question is
> kind of bad (it allows blind injection of arbitrary data into
> things like http download
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:34:39 +0100 Lisi Reisz
wrote:
> The "fix" seems not to have been dealt with yet, but the list has
> published a workaround at some length in this thread:
Updated kernels have been announced and released by the kernel folks
at this point. (See, for example:
http://seclists.
tack in question is
> > kind of bad (it allows blind injection of arbitrary data into
> > things like http downloads) and has been known for a few weeks now to
> > the general public.
> >
> > Any idea out there when updates to the kernels in question will be
> > rel
> things like http downloads) and has been known for a few weeks now to
> the general public.
>
> Any idea out there when updates to the kernels in question will be
> released?
>
>
I could have sworn I saw a fix for this sometime last week, as I would only
have become aware of it when
idea out there when updates to the kernels in question will be
released?
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
Hi all,
Below is my preseed.cfg file.
What's wrong with it?
Why am I getting "unexpected inconsistency" and forced to run fsck after a
fresh installation?
d-i debian-installer/locale string en_US
d-i keyboard-configuration/xkb-keymap select us
d-i console-keymaps-at/keymap
On 02/11/14 01:37, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
Thoughts?!
As I understand it, eudev is intended to provide all of udev's
externally-visible functionality in an interface-compatible way, so it
seems to me that whoever packages eudev should *probably* be able to
declare it to be an adequate replace
On Sb, 01 nov 14, 23:37:32, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>
> I'm thinking here about the future of `udev` and alt-init systems
> (systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart)...
>
> Apparently, `udev` will stop working without systemd = PID1 (am I
> right?),
[citation needed]
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
htt
Guys,
I'm thinking here about the future of `udev` and alt-init systems
(systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart)...
Apparently, `udev` will stop working without systemd = PID1 (am I
right?), so, to keep Debian working with `sysvinit-core` and others
(probably, I think), we'll need a new `udev`. L
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Sb, 04 oct 14, 16:44:17, Mark Carroll wrote:
(snip)
> The only time one could say stable is "catching up to testing" is the
> moment of a stable release, but even then, it's not quite accurate since
> the current testing *becomes* stable, the next testing is started
On Sb, 04 oct 14, 16:44:17, Mark Carroll wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
> > On Sb, 23 aug 14, 13:43:50, Mark Carroll wrote:
> >>
> >> Package: *
> >> Pin: release a=testing
> >> Pin-Priority: 50
> >>
> >> Package: *
> >> Pin: release a=unstable
> >> Pin-Priority: 40
> >
> > This will make bot
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Sb, 23 aug 14, 13:43:50, Mark Carroll wrote:
>>
>> In my /etc/apt/preferences.d/preferences I have,
>>
>> Package: *
>> Pin: release a=stable
>> Pin-Priority: 600
>
> You are increasing priority of stable, from 500 to 600, why?
I can't remember; it never seemed to b
[for the archives]
On Sb, 23 aug 14, 13:43:50, Mark Carroll wrote:
>
> In my /etc/apt/preferences.d/preferences I have,
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=stable
> Pin-Priority: 600
You are increasing priority of stable, from 500 to 600, why?
> and also,
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=testing
>
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 07:55:37 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > What would be the best way I could install qt5 on my Wheezy without
> > borking everything else that depends on qt4?
>
> Just do it. There's no problem with having both installed. They
> won't interfere.
Thanks John
Steve Litt wrote:
> What would be the best way I could install qt5 on my Wheezy without
> borking everything else that depends on qt4?
Just do it. There's no problem with having both installed. They won't
interfere.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Steve Litt writes:
> Unfortunately, one program that might be mission critical to my
> business, Sigil, now requires qt5 to compile, and of course Wheezy
> doesn't have a qt5 package.
>
> What would be the best way I could install qt5 on my Wheezy without
> borking everything else that depends on
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
Normally, I use the packages given me by a distro. I don't like to gum
things up. And because I use Linux for my everyday business, my
priority is stability, so of course I use Wheezy.
Unfortunately, one program that might be mission critical to my
business, Sigil, now
Hi all,
Normally, I use the packages given me by a distro. I don't like to gum
things up. And because I use Linux for my everyday business, my
priority is stability, so of course I use Wheezy.
Unfortunately, one program that might be mission critical to my
business, Sigil, now requires qt5 to com
Karl Vogel wrote:
>If you don't add or delete a lot of accounts or modify /etc/passwd
>frequently, could you change your password to the high-security one,
>copy /etc/shadow to /etc/shadow.hi, then change it back and copy
>/etc/shadow to /etc/shadow.lo? Then your password-changer c
>> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:40:24 -0700,
>> Bob Proulx said:
B> I would create a script that edited the /etc/shadow file directly and
B> manipulated the encrypted passwords. Then the clear text would never
B> need to exist in any form. Only the encrypted form of the password is
B> needed. Use a
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:22:06 +0100, Wojtek wrote in message
<4eb85a0e.7080...@elka.pw.edu.pl>:
> Hi,
>
> I often have to leave my students with my laptop and e.g. go to scan
> some documents or to receive printed papers from the printer room.
> Then I have to lock the console when leaving, and u
quite long, it is uncomfortable to enter it
> (especially with my students watching my keyboard ;-) ) after every
> return.
>
> I think it could be nice to have a possibility to use a special
> configuration of screen-locker, using another, shorter and simpler
> password...
Here
Hi,
I often have to leave my students with my laptop and e.g. go to scan some documents or to receive printed papers from the printer room. Then I have to lock the console when leaving, and unlock it when
coming back.
As my login password is quite long, it is uncomfortable to enter it (especial
Grub, LVM on MDRaid and Squeeze?
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#mdadm-metadata
so, thats my last idea ...
Am 20.09.2011 15:30, schrieb Brent Clark:
> On 20/09/2011 14:35, manuel wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> check for "activat
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:35:10 -0700, Bob wrote in message
<20101112213510.gd12...@hysteria.proulx.com>:
> Mitchell Laks wrote:
> > ... they bent some of the pins...
> > there are about 900 !!!
>
> 938 pins
..grab your and empty your 0.3 or 0.5mm mechanical pencil, slip
its lead tube over each p
1 - 100 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
