Good afternoon
Thank You for help. Its Debian 11 LXDE I did not find a button: Install printer. Regards Sophie ________________________________ Von: Andrew M.A. Cater <amaca...@einval.com> Gesendet: Montag, 24. April 2023 21:41 An: debian-user@lists.debian.org <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Betreff: Re: Was it a good idea to buy an Epson printer? On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 01:36:24PM +0000, Schwibinger Michael wrote: > > > Good afternoon > > Thank You > Was it a good idea to buy EPSON? > > Regards > Sophie > Good evening, Sophie Many printers can be supported in Debian: one way or another we should be able to help you. Since we cannot be with you to see exactly what you are doing: could you please answer some questions for the list to help us to help you? Just to check: Exactly which version of Debian are you using? You can find this in the file /etc/debian_version Which desktop environment are you running? GNOME or KDE or one of the others? Many desktop environments have Settings or something similar gathering together tools to set up screens, sound and printers. Thank you for your help in helping us :) With best wishes Andy Cater or something similar which gathers together tools to set up sound, screens and so on. > > > ________________________________ > Von: The Wanderer > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. April 2023 23:28 > Bis: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Betreff: Re: EPSON ET M 1120 new printer: If You can read this, you are using > the wrong driver > > On 2023-04-14 at 19:17, Brian wrote: > > > On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 19:06:08 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > > > >> On 2023-04-14 at 18:52, Brian wrote: > > >>> The EPSON ET M 1120 doesn't exist. Do we have to guess its > >>> correct name as well as any other relevant information? > >> > >> When I searched for > >> > >> Epson ET M 1120 > >> > >> I got a suggestion that I may have meant "M1120" instead of the > >> last two search terms, and hits for the "Epson EcoTank ET M1120" > >> and/or "Epson EcoTank M1120", which look to be different names for > >> the same model and to be a fairly clear match. > >> > >> While, yes, specifying the exact name clearly would be preferable, > >> this is far from unreasonably difficult to figure out. > > > > I decided to take your signature as a template for my original > > response :). > > I can respect that! > > >>> I haven't a clue what you are going on about here. Shift-L in > >>> mutt was used at this end. > >> > >> Your replies to the OP have been fine, AFAIK. The OP's message was > >> itself a reply, as can be seen by looking at its headers > >> (In-Reply-To: and References:), but was otherwise presented as if > >> it had been the start of a new thread; that is not fine, because it > >> hides the "new thread" inside of the existing one, at least for > >> anyone using a threaded view of the list of messages. > > > > That's an issue for the OP, not me. > > Certainly. I was meaning that bullet-point item as an addendum to the > list you provided (which I understand to have been aimed at the OP), not > as something directed at you. > > -- > The Wanderer > > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all > progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw >
