On 02/02/2025 10:39, John Conover wrote:
[2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \
Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \
object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \
Did not receive a reply.
Does anyone k
On Sat 01 Feb 2025 at 19:39:55 (-0800), John Conover wrote:
>
> [2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \
> Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \
> object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \
> Did not receiv
[2139:2164:0201/184043.963188:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] \
Failed to call method: org.freedesktop.DBus.StartServiceByName: \
object_path= /org/freedesktop/DBus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: \
Did not receive a reply.
Does anyone know where freedesktop is from:
org.free
On Thursday 30 January 2025 10:13:39 am Richard Owlett wrote:
> > On another, I've switched search-engine defaults from
> > Google to (the HTML-only version of) DuckDuckGo. So far neither is
> > giving me such an obviously superior experience for me to decide to
> >
On 1/30/25 8:15 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2025-01-30 at 08:52, Will Mengarini wrote:
w3m needs some serious maintenance. It's still my favorite browser,
but I hear Google is planning to start requiring Javascript for
searches, so somebody's going to have to step up if w3m is to rem
On 2025-01-30 at 08:52, Will Mengarini wrote:
> w3m needs some serious maintenance. It's still my favorite browser,
> but I hear Google is planning to start requiring Javascript for
> searches, so somebody's going to have to step up if w3m is to remain
> viable.
Planning
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 01:39:34PM -, Curt wrote:
[...]
> It would've been clearer to have advised using another mail application,
> period [...]
> But no harm, no foul, and all is well. The only real mystery is how
> Tomas resisted getting yet another lick in against Gma
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:34:10PM +0100, Gareth Evans wrote:
> On 4 May 2023, at 22:20, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:10:51PM +0100, Gareth Evans wrote:
> >>> On 4 May 2023, at 22:00, zithro wrote:
> >>> 29 Apr 2023 05:31, Gareth Evans wro
> On 4 May 2023, at 22:20, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:10:51PM +0100, Gareth Evans wrote:
>>> On 4 May 2023, at 22:00, zithro wrote:
>>> 29 Apr 2023 05:31, Gareth Evans wrote:
>>>> It seems Google Remote Desktop, a Chrome exte
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:10:51PM +0100, Gareth Evans wrote:
> On 4 May 2023, at 22:00, zithro wrote:
> > 29 Apr 2023 05:31, Gareth Evans wrote:
> >> It seems Google Remote Desktop, a Chrome extension, does not work
> >> properly with Buster + Mate. I haven't tr
> On 4 May 2023, at 22:00, zithro wrote:
>
> On 29 Apr 2023 05:31, Gareth Evans wrote:
>> It seems Google Remote Desktop, a Chrome extension, does not work properly
>> with Buster + Mate. I haven't tried with Bullseye, which is not an option
>> in the e
On 29 Apr 2023 05:31, Gareth Evans wrote:
It seems Google Remote Desktop, a Chrome extension, does not work properly with
Buster + Mate. I haven't tried with Bullseye, which is not an option in the
environment concerned due to CUPS bugs, but in Buster there is about 5 seconds
of remote-
It seems Google Remote Desktop, a Chrome extension, does not work properly with
Buster + Mate. I haven't tried with Bullseye, which is not an option in the
environment concerned due to CUPS bugs, but in Buster there is about 5 seconds
of remote-mouse-movement then no more.
Does anyone kn
30 mars 2023, 23:56 de debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de:
I was successful at downloading the video with:
yt-dlp --verbose -k --ignore-config -c
https://manifest.prod.boltdns.net/manifest/v1/hls/v4/clear/1241706627001/83ddeca4-2e3a-4149-840f-0ca907c2cb59/10s/master.m3u8?fastly_token=Nj
Am 31.03.2023 um 00:28 schrieb l0f...@tuta.io:
> How do you get that URL? Via your browser resource/code inspector?
Hi, i had been asking not having to answer that question, because i
myself do not really understand, how it works.
I stumbled across an explanation while skimming through open issue
Hi,
30 mars 2023, 23:56 de debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de:
> I was successful at downloading the video with:
>
>> yt-dlp --verbose -k --ignore-config -c
>> https://manifest.prod.boltdns.net/manifest/v1/hls/v4/clear/1241706627001/83ddeca4-2e3a-4149-840f-0ca907c2cb59/10s/master.m3u8?fastl
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 23:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
Hello l0f...@tuta.io,
>Interesting theory but I can play that specific video in my browser
>without being logged in ;)
Weird; I had to log in first. No idea why your experience differs.
Still, as this doesn't forward the core issu
Am 30.03.2023 um 20:20 schrieb Bret Busby:
> On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote:
>> On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> I had previously been able to use youtu
Hello Brad,
30 mars 2023, 23:20 de b...@fineby.me.uk:
> >In your case, yt-dlp falls back on its generic extractor (documentation
> >says "Generic downloader that works on some sites") but it doesn't work
> >for familysearch.org visibly...
>
> Largely, I suspect, it's because to access video on th
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:55:05 +0200 (CEST)
l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
Hello l0f...@tuta.io,
>In your case, yt-dlp falls back on its generic extractor (documentation
>says "Generic downloader that works on some sites") but it doesn't work
>for familysearch.org visibly...
Largely, I suspect, it's becaus
Hello,
30 mars 2023, 20:46 de b...@busby.net:
> Fri Mar 31 02:18:31 bret@bret-Precision-Tower-5810:~$yt-dlp
> https://www.familysearch.org/rootstech/session/expanding-your-family-tree-with-sideview-and-more-innovations-from-ancestrydna?lang=eng
> [generic]
> expanding-your-family-tree-with-side
On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
youtube, but, it no longer work
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:08:19PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
[...]
> Writing "did not work" just doesn't cut it on this list:
> we need some specifics. Here's an example I ran this
> morning on a reference given by David Christensen:
T
On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> >
> > > I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> > > youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
> >
On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp.
You can downlo
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp.
You can download it from bullseye-backports. If you'
On 2023-03-30, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
>
If you're not using the latest version, this is it:
https://youtube-dl.org/downloads/latest/youtube-dl-2021.12.17.tar.gz
I used this (or
. Conspiracy
theories tossed aside, that's still a rational possibility that needs
pursued on my end here.
BUT THEN... Google Chrome does work properly. That's why I haven't
wasted any time nor brain storage on actively investigating local ISP
throttling as a most likely answer. :)
tossed aside, that's still a rational possibility that needs
> pursued on my end here.
>
> BUT THEN... Google Chrome does work properly. That's why I haven't
> wasted any time nor brain storage on actively investigating local ISP
> throttling as a most likely answe
On 3/26/23, Juan R.D. Silva wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Debian Bullseye here up to date. Browsers installed: Firefox, Opera,
> Vivaldi, and Google Chrome.
>
> I'm having a weird problem streaming movies from archive.org. The movies
> are lagging & keep buffering in
Hi folks,
Debian Bullseye here up to date. Browsers installed: Firefox, Opera,
Vivaldi, and Google Chrome.
I'm having a weird problem streaming movies from archive.org. The movies
are lagging & keep buffering in all browsers but Google Chrome. Google
Chrome streams same movies at
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Remigio wrote:
...
The package rclone can do this.
unfortunately I can't find Rclone package
Furter information?
Thanks
Wild guess, but lenny probably predates google drive so rclone won't be
present unless you can backport. (someone can check the dates but
Hello. Rclone is in official Debian repo. Just check this
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/rclone
2022-09-28, tr, 14:48 Remigio rašė:
>
> ...
> > The package rclone can do this.
> unfortunately I can't find Rclone package
> Furter information?
> Thanks
>
...
> The package rclone can do this.
unfortunately I can't find Rclone package
Furter information?
Thanks
x27;s possible to automatically send the .sql file created
> via cron to a Google Drive account. That file is usually about 200 Mb.
The package rclone can do this.
-dsr-
ql file created via
cron to a Google Drive account. That file is usually about 200 Mb.
Thanks for helping me
--
Remigio
Corentin Bardet writes:
> I think you have no other option than using Google Chrome for your
> meetings.
Screen sharing works in Firefox ESR on Wayland. So I still have
options. Just that few features - like blur background etc. doesn't
work in FF.
On Sun, 2022-09-11 at 10:26 +0200, Corentin Bardet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 2022-09-11 07:39, Pankaj Jangid a écrit :
> > For a few work related meetings, I have to use Google Meet. But the
> > screensharing doesn't work in the Chromium installed from stable APT
> > r
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 10:26, Corentin Bardet
wrote:
Hi,
Le 2022-09-11 07:39, Pankaj Jangid a écrit :
For a few work related meetings, I have to use Google Meet. But the
screensharing doesn't work in the Chromium installed from stable APT
repository. Clicking on the share-screen ico
Hi,
Le 2022-09-11 07:39, Pankaj Jangid a écrit :
For a few work related meetings, I have to use Google Meet. But the
screensharing doesn't work in the Chromium installed from stable APT
repository. Clicking on the share-screen icon and then selecting any of
the three options - Tab, Wi
For a few work related meetings, I have to use Google Meet. But the
screensharing doesn't work in the Chromium installed from stable APT
repository. Clicking on the share-screen icon and then selecting any of
the three options - Tab, Windows, Entire Screen - shows this error
message,
On Thursday, June 09, 2022 02:13:31 AM mick crane wrote:
> I finally had to set up an app password for mail to work.
> During the process of discovering what to click on there was the
> statement.
> "Google will never use the content of your emails in order to select
> wh
that. Let the "official
reasonning" be based on "security". Great cover story, bcoz we like to
trust the security mirage [Bruce Schneier]!
I finally had to set up an app password for mail to work.
During the process of discovering what to click on there was the
statement.
&
Am 09.06.2022 um 01:54 schrieb rhkra...@gmail.com:
>> if we leave aside for a moment incriminations of corporate power and
>> plots, is there some reason to connect the two methods?
> No -- from a purely logical point of view (afaics) there is no reason to
> connect them -- Goo
On Wednesday, June 08, 2022 05:58:44 PM Felmon Davis wrote:
> I don't understand the *logical* connection. logically you can have
> app-specific pw's without 2-step auth. (not sure about the other way
> around.)
Google requires 2-step authorization as a prerequisite to a
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Kamil Jońca wrote:
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
On Wednesday, June 08, 2022 12:18:58 PM Curt wrote:
On 2022-06-08, Felmon Davis wrote:
that's the thing: I don't understand how the parts fit together; what
is the connection between:
(1) 2-step auth
(2) app-specific pw
Wi
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> On Wednesday, June 08, 2022 12:18:58 PM Curt wrote:
>> On 2022-06-08, Felmon Davis wrote:
>> > that's the thing: I don't understand how the parts fit together; what
>> > is the connection between:
>> >
>> > (1) 2-step auth
>> > (2) app-specific pw
>>
>> Without (1)
On 2022-06-08, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 08, 2022 12:18:58 PM Curt wrote:
>> On 2022-06-08, Felmon Davis wrote:
>> > that's the thing: I don't understand how the parts fit together; what
>> > is the connection between:
>> >
>> > (1) 2-step auth
>> > (2) app-specific pw
>>
>
On Wednesday, June 08, 2022 12:18:58 PM Curt wrote:
> On 2022-06-08, Felmon Davis wrote:
> > that's the thing: I don't understand how the parts fit together; what
> > is the connection between:
> >
> > (1) 2-step auth
> > (2) app-specific pw
>
> Without (1) turned on, you cannot create (2).
But
On 2022-06-08, Felmon Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, June 07, 2022 09:38:42 PM Felmon Davis wrote:
>>> be it a/b testing or b/s testing, the change seems to have gone into
>>> effect and I can only use Alpine by acquiring an "app-password".
>>>
>>> I'
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2022 09:38:42 PM Felmon Davis wrote:
be it a/b testing or b/s testing, the change seems to have gone into
effect and I can only use Alpine by acquiring an "app-password".
I'm wondering if I can turn off 2-step authentification
On Tuesday, June 07, 2022 09:38:42 PM Felmon Davis wrote:
> be it a/b testing or b/s testing, the change seems to have gone into
> effect and I can only use Alpine by acquiring an "app-password".
>
> I'm wondering if I can turn off 2-step authentification now.
I'm curious about the same thing --
be it a/b testing or b/s testing, the change seems to have gone into effect
> and I can only use Alpine by acquiring an "app-password".
>
> I'm wondering if I can turn off 2-step authentification now.
I wasn't clear enough, it seems. With "sinking ship" I was rather
referring to Google "mail".
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Felmon Davis wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
I misspoke or miswrote: I have Alpine running but *without* the app-specific
setting.
They're messing with your brain. I'd leave the
On Sat, 04 Jun 2022 20:08:37 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Please don't feed the troll.
No worry John,
I have the tools prepared.
Most secure laptop in the world. The writer of my BIOS is a coreboot forker. He
soldered the CMOS by hand.
Capitalists can't even break in my BIOS to stop me.
They ca
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 20:40:34 EDT Larry Martell wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM sp...@caiway.net
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The reason:
> >
> > I am promoting a free volunteer-run run society.
> >
> > This mailing list as example for how I learned. Thanks!
> >
> > Things go faster and
https://www.kaiostech.com/developers/
let firefox win the browserwar
help the third world before they get captured by american capitalism
we have the tools
Arne
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 19:50:02 -0500
Larry Martell wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:44 PM sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> >
> > NO!
> >
>
Please don't feed the troll.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:44 PM sp...@caiway.net wrote:
>
> NO!
>
> Some people like to work for a boss and follow orders from imbiciles.
You sound like an imbecile to me.
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 19:40:34 -0500
> Larry Martell wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM sp...@caiway.net wrote:
>
NO!
Some people like to work for a boss and follow orders from imbiciles.
Arne
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 19:40:34 -0500
Larry Martell wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The reason:
> >
> > I am promoting a free volunteer-run run society.
> >
> > This
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM sp...@caiway.net wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The reason:
>
> I am promoting a free volunteer-run run society.
>
> This mailing list as example for how I learned. Thanks!
>
> Things go faster and better.
>
>
> All those commercial ones only have one goal: make more profit.
>
>
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 17:07:32 -0400
Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > There will be always volunteers for learning/perfectioning a mailserver.
> >
> > Donations for the best mailserver in the world for example.
> As a sysadmin of a mailserver, I can tell you this would never be able to
> compete on up
Hi,
The reason:
I am promoting a free volunteer-run run society.
This mailing list as example for how I learned. Thanks!
Things go faster and better.
All those commercial ones only have one goal: make more profit.
Led by stupid managers with only $ $ eyes giving orders to developers.
Thank
> There will be always volunteers for learning/perfectioning a mailserver.
>
> Donations for the best mailserver in the world for example.
As a sysadmin of a mailserver, I can tell you this would never be able to
compete on uptime, security, and features of gmail.
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 10:02:05PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My first mail provider (in Oslo) promised free mailadress for life.
>
> Then it was sold to a kapitalist and they started to ask money.
>
> I do not like that.
>
> I know it is possible to run a free host.
>
> By volun
On 6/4/22 4:02 PM, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
Hi,
My first mail provider (in Oslo) promised free mailadress for life.
Then it was sold to a kapitalist and they started to ask money.
I do not like that.
I know it is possible to run a free host.
By volunteers running the server for example.
Why
On Sat, 04 Jun 2022 15:34:19 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> sp...@caiway.net writes:
> > I know it is possible to run a free host.
> > By volunteers running the server for example.
>
> There are expenses. Who pays them?
There will be always volunteers for learning/perfectioning a mailserver.
Don
sp...@caiway.net writes:
> I know it is possible to run a free host.
> By volunteers running the server for example.
There are expenses. Who pays them?
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Hi,
My first mail provider (in Oslo) promised free mailadress for life.
Then it was sold to a kapitalist and they started to ask money.
I do not like that.
I know it is possible to run a free host.
By volunteers running the server for example.
Arne
On Sat, 04 Jun 2022 14:00:27 -0500
John
On 06/04/2022 01:50 PM, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
*SNIP*
So I am also in the search for a good free provider.
FREE COSTS *TOO MUCH*
If you think Google et al are charities
I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn.
Arne writes:
> So I am also in the search for a good free provider.
Why does it need to be free?
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Hi,
IMO I would search for another mail account.
I use google mail only for sites where i expect SPAM.
Last time I checked google mail is some 3 years ago.
So I tried my provider's mail account.
There it is not possible to send to protonmail.
It has also no working web interface.
So
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Felmon Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2022, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> I misspoke or miswrote: I have Alpine running but *without* the app-specific
> setting.
>
> > They're messing with your brain. I'd leave the sinking ship.
> >
>
> I'm glad to hav
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 04:39:39PM +0200, Felmon Davis wrote:
[...]
> the furniture, Gentlemen, mind the furniture!
That one's good :-)
Thanks for a hearty laugh!
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Felmon Davis wrote:
I do think Google et al. sometimes make pronouncements and then don't get
off their ass ('arse' if you prefer) - that how committees work with (or
against) other commit
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 02:24:16PM -, Curt wrote:
On 2022-06-04, wrote:
Bullshit.
Famous last word.
I've already determined that your principles go no deeper than your
dime-a-dozen opinions.
This might be due to your short-sightedn
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 02:24:16PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-06-04, wrote:
> >
> >> >
>
> >> Bullshit.
> >
> > Famous last word.
> >
>
> I've already determined that your principles go no deeper than your
> dime-a-dozen opinions.
This might be due to your short-sightedness. Or not.
Cheers
On 2022-06-04, wrote:
>
>> >
>> Bullshit.
>
> Famous last word.
>
I've already determined that your principles go no deeper than your
dime-a-dozen opinions.
On 2022-06-04, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
>>Bullshit.
>>
> Well!
>
> What a witty, erudite, cogent, well reasoned, rational and eloquently
> put explanation.
>
> I'm convinced.
>
That's what's missing from *your* affirmation and the very reason it is
pure bullshit.
t;
> > What a witty, erudite, cogent, well reasoned, rational and eloquently
> > put explanation.
> >
> > I'm convinced.
> >
> >
>
> not his usual stylistic savoir-faire but who cares? we'll soon know what's
> going on.
>
> I do th
27;ll soon know
what's going on.
I do think Google et al. sometimes make pronouncements and then don't
get off their ass ('arse' if you prefer) - that how committees work
with (or against) other committees.
for now, I still have Alpine with the app-specific setting.
fjd
--
Davis
Verbum sat sapienti.
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 11:50:55 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
Hello Curt,
>Bullshit.
>
Well!
What a witty, erudite, cogent, well reasoned, rational and eloquently
put explanation.
I'm convinced.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent"
/ _)rad "
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 11:50:55AM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-06-02, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> > Expect access from anything other than google's own web interface to go
> > away at some point in the future.
> >
>
> Bullshit.
Famous last word.
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2022-06-02, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> Expect access from anything other than google's own web interface to go
> away at some point in the future.
>
Bullshit.
On Thursday, June 02, 2022 01:59:45 PM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I then entered that in place of the old passwords in kmail. (I don't think
> it stated it -- I wasn't sure whether to enter the spaces as part of the
> password or not -- I did, and that worked.)
An update -- that was on an old (t
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 20:33:54 +0200 (CEST)
Felmon Davis wrote:
Hello Felmon,
>guess Google's still trying to figure out which 3rd-party clients they
>dislike.
All of them.
Expect access from anything other than google's own web interface to go
away at some point in the future.
--
Regards _
that old
version of kmail (version 1.13.7 for kde 4.8.4 on Debian Wheezy)
works again using pop3
I had a little trouble setting it up until I got to the right place
in google -- I first tried to change the settings on the gmail
webclient page but couldn't find the correct options. Then logg
works again using pop3
>
> I had a little trouble setting it up until I got to the right place
> in google -- I first tried to change the settings on the gmail
> webclient page but couldn't find the correct options. Then logged in
> on google.com and did find the correct option
y)
stopped working around 8:30 am this morning.
I set up an application specific password this morning, and that old version of
kmail (version 1.13.7 for kde 4.8.4 on Debian Wheezy) works again using pop3
I had a little trouble setting it up until I got to the right place in google
-- I first
ntication enabled it is possible to generate app
> >> password for use with standard authentication.
> >
> > It's June 1st and my ability to collect mail via POP3 from gmail is
> > unimpaired. No OAUTH2 or 2FA at this site. Whatever Google intended
> > the situation to
or 2FA at this site. Whatever Google intended
the situation to be after May 30th, it appears the interpretation by
some users of their mail was off the mark.
I'd just allowed non secure apps a year or so ago and seems to be still
working.
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
> > With two factor authentication enabled it is possible to generate
> > > app password for use with standard authentication.
> >
> > It's June 1st and my ability to collect mail via POP3 from gmail is
> > unimpaired. No OAUTH2 or 2FA at this site. Whatever
thentication.
>
> It's June 1st and my ability to collect mail via POP3 from gmail is
> unimpaired. No OAUTH2 or 2FA at this site. Whatever Google intended
> the situation to be after May 30th, it appears the interpretation by
> some users of their mail was off the mark.
&g
ed. No OAUTH2 or 2FA at this site. Whatever Google intended
the situation to be after May 30th, it appears the interpretation by
some users of their mail was off the mark.
--
Brian.
On 17/5/22 6:23 am, nimrod wrote:
Hi,
recently Google Chrome started to leave around a "chrome
--enable-crashpad" process every time I closed it. Each of such
processes sucks 25% of CPU. If I open another instance of Chrome and I
close it, another process is created and reaches
Hi,
recently Google Chrome started to leave around a "chrome --enable-
crashpad" process every time I closed it. Each of such processes sucks
25% of CPU. If I open another instance of Chrome and I close it,
another process is created and reaches the 25% of CPU, and so on and so
forth.
On Mon 16 May 2022 at 14:31:50 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Sun 15 May 2022 at 22:39:14 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 14 May 2022 at 14:02:36 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> > > On Sat 14 May 2022 at 12:02:49 -, Curt wrote:
> > > > On 2022-05-14, wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 08:58:37
On Sun 15 May 2022 at 22:39:14 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 14 May 2022 at 14:02:36 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 14 May 2022 at 12:02:49 -, Curt wrote:
> > > On 2022-05-14, wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 08:58:37AM -, Curt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > >> W
On Sat, 14 May 2022 07:25:36 +0200
wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 03:05:11PM +1200, Ash Joubert wrote:
> > On 14/05/2022 00:42, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:16:11AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > A loong password is not "equivalent" to 2FA, that's right. Good
>
On Sat, 14 May 2022 15:05:11 +1200
Ash Joubert wrote:
> On 14/05/2022 00:42, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:16:11AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >> A loong password is not "equivalent" to 2FA, that's right. Good
> >> password management (of which length is but a part) is
1 - 100 of 1032 matches
Mail list logo
