upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to the specific version
Caution: This email originated outside of Semtech.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:52 AM Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
>
> Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to
> the specific version (GLIBCXX_3.4.29, GLIBC
Gremlin wrote:
The new OS called Raspberry Pi OS is a new animal. The foundation
used raspian and the the Raspberry Pi OS is the foundations, developed
by the foundation.
Yet it is still based on Debian, according to their changelog
https://downloads.raspberrypi.com/raspios_arm64/release_notes
Gremlin wrote:
> On 2/27/24 16:08, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Gremlin wrote:
> >
> >> The provider is raspberry foundation and Raspian has been
> >> dis-continued.
> Nope that is just wrong.
>
> https://www.raspbian.org/
[snip]
> Note: Raspbian is not affiliated with the Raspber
On 2/27/24 16:21, Gremlin wrote:
On 2/27/24 16:08, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
The provider is raspberry foundation and Raspian has been
dis-continued.
There is such a thing as the Raspberry Pi Foundation but they are an
educational charity. Pis are supplied by Raspberr
On 2/27/24 16:08, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
The provider is raspberry foundation and Raspian has been
dis-continued.
There is such a thing as the Raspberry Pi Foundation but they are an
educational charity. Pis are supplied by Raspberry Pi Ltd. Raspbian has
NOT been di
Gremlin wrote:
> The provider is raspberry foundation and Raspian has been
> dis-continued.
There is such a thing as the Raspberry Pi Foundation but they are an
educational charity. Pis are supplied by Raspberry Pi Ltd. Raspbian has
NOT been discontinued, it has simply been renamed Raspberry Pi
On 2/27/24 10:08, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Unable to Process Request
We couldn't access the content delivery.
This content has been deleted, doesn't exist, or can't be previewed.
Gonna be hard to do that
OP might then take a look at editing the elf file directly. `objdump
--remove-section .sym
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:28 AM Gremlin wrote:
>
> On 2/27/24 09:23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 8:34 AM Gremlin
> > wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> Another option is to rebuild blueriver_bitmap_streamer. Before the
> >>> build, rip out that useless symbol versioning. All that symb
On 2/27/24 09:23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 8:34 AM Gremlin wrote:
On 2/27/24 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:52 AM Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to the
specific version
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 8:34 AM Gremlin wrote:
>
> On 2/27/24 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:52 AM Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
> >>
> >> Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to
> >> the specific
> He is most likely using armv7 and that comes with its own issues, ie
> cpu type and floating point (hard/soft, neon and simd). aarch64 much
> easier to build on.
I'm using Debian armhf here on various machines (most of them with ARMv7
CPUs but some one of them with an ARMv8 CPU (and kernel)).
I
On 2/27/24 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:52 AM Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to the
specific version (GLIBCXX_3.4.29, GLIBC_2.34) on Debian?
I am using the Raspberry Pi 4B with the Raspbian OS “Linux
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:52 AM Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
>
> Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to
> the specific version (GLIBCXX_3.4.29, GLIBC_2.34) on Debian?
>
> I am using the Raspberry Pi 4B with the Raspbian OS “Linux raspberrypi
> 5.1
On 2/27/24 08:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:08:47AM -0500, Gremlin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:51:13AM +, Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
I am using the Raspberry Pi 4B with the Raspbian OS “Linux
raspberrypi 5.15.61-v8+ #1579 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 26 11:16:44
BST 2022 aar
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:08:47AM -0500, Gremlin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:51:13AM +, Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
> > > > I am using the Raspberry Pi 4B with the Raspbian OS “Linux
> > > > raspberrypi 5.15.61-v8+ #1579 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 26 11:16:44
> > > > BST 2022 aarch64 GNU/Linu
On 2/27/24 07:38, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi all,
Am 27.02.2024 um 13:19 schrieb Greg Wooledge:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:51:13AM +, Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
Hi,
Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and
GLIBC to the specific version (GLIBCXX_3.4.29, GLIBC_2.34) on
Hi all,
Am 27.02.2024 um 13:19 schrieb Greg Wooledge:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:51:13AM +, Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
Hi,
Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to the
specific version (GLIBCXX_3.4.29, GLIBC_2.34) on Debian?
I am using the Raspberry Pi 4B
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:51:13AM +, Diego Luo （罗国雄） wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to
> the specific version (GLIBCXX_3.4.29, GLIBC_2.34) on Debian?
>
> I am using the Raspberry Pi 4B with the Raspbian OS
Hi,
Would you pls help give tips about how to upgrade the GLIBCXX and GLIBC to the
specific version (GLIBCXX_3.4.29, GLIBC_2.34) on Debian?
I am using the Raspberry Pi 4B with the Raspbian OS “Linux raspberrypi
5.15.61-v8+ #1579 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 26 11:16:44 BST 2022 aarch64 GNU/Linux
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Arno Schuring
wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 08:41:44 +0100
> > From: zen75...@zen.co.uk
> >
> > On 06/07/15 06:07, Dhiraj Bhor wrote:
> >> Also wanted to know which are security bugs reported for glibc-2.19-18.
> >> Tha
> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 08:41:44 +0100
> From: zen75...@zen.co.uk
>
> On 06/07/15 06:07, Dhiraj Bhor wrote:
>> Also wanted to know which are security bugs reported for glibc-2.19-18.
>> Thanks for being patient.
>
> Information about current bugs in Debian packages
On 06/07/15 06:07, Dhiraj Bhor wrote:
Also wanted to know which are security bugs reported for glibc-2.19-18.
Thanks for being patient.
Information about current bugs in Debian packages can be found through
the Bug Tracking System at https://bugs.debian.org/
Upstream bug information for GNU
Quoting Dhiraj Bhor (dhirajbho...@gmail.com):
>
> I read from https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental link that installing
> experimental package will functinaly break the system.
> I want to know when experimental branch will become stable,
In a word, never.
> Do i get any page
> where this
his information already exist?
>
Also wanted to know which are security bugs reported for glibc-2.19-18.
Thanks for being patient.
Dhiraj
I read from https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental link that installing
experimental package will functinaly break the system.
I want to know when experimental branch will become stable, Do i get any
page where this information already exist?
Dhiraj
lly need latest development tools, i suggest you to switch to
> > Fedora 22. (glibc-2.21-5 and gcc 5.1.1). It will be easier and faster
> > than trying to modify glibc stuff in Debian 8.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > I would like to but its a requirement and i have t
> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:37:03 +0530
> From: dhirajbho...@gmail.com
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:31 PM, claude juif
> mailto:claude.j...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you really need latest development tools, i suggest you to switch to
> Fedora 22. (g
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 12:07:26PM +0530, Dhiraj Bhor wrote:
>Hi,
>I have debian jessie (8.0) on virtual machine.
>$] uname -a
>Linux rdx86-ds7 3.16.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1
>(2015-04-24) i686 GNU/Linux
>I need to install latest gl
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:31 PM, claude juif wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you really need latest development tools, i suggest you to switch to
> Fedora 22. (glibc-2.21-5 and gcc 5.1.1). It will be easier and faster than
> trying to modify glibc stuff in Debian 8.
>
> Regards,
>
>
Hi,
If you really need latest development tools, i suggest you to switch to
Fedora 22. (glibc-2.21-5 and gcc 5.1.1). It will be easier and faster than
trying to modify glibc stuff in Debian 8.
Regards,
2015-07-03 11:56 GMT+02:00 Dhiraj Bhor :
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Sv
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Dhiraj Bhor wrote:
>
> > $] wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.21.tar.xz
> > $] tar xf glibc-2.21.tar.xz
> > $] mkdir glibc-test
> > $] cd glibc-test
> > $] ../glibc-2.21/configure --prefix=/usr
>
Dhiraj Bhor wrote:
> $] wget http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.21.tar.xz
> $] tar xf glibc-2.21.tar.xz
> $] mkdir glibc-test
> $] cd glibc-test
> $] ../glibc-2.21/configure --prefix=/usr
You do know that installing your own glibc over the one supplied by
Debian in the same
Hi,
I have debian jessie (8.0) on virtual machine.
$] uname -a
Linux rdx86-ds7 3.16.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1
(2015-04-24) i686 GNU/Linux
I need to install latest glibc (libc-2.21) on this machine.
My debian currently have libc-2.19
$] ls -lah /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
ugh
>>> so I have a very faint clue what your talking about...
>>
>> If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
>> with.
>
> Jessie is completely stable, according to my experience. You will be
> better off just doing a fresh install
Hi.
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:35:54 +0100
Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> On 29. jan. 2015 20:12, Stephen wrote:
> > On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> >> If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
> >> with.
> >>
> >
On 29. jan. 2015 20:12, Stephen wrote:
On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
with.
Grüße,
Sven.
Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite
adventurous but I can handle not playing VV
Stephen wrote:
> I don't want to break anything. I am quite adventurous but I can
> handle not playing VV until Jessie releases
I just tried the Windows demo with this command:
$ wine ./vv_demo.exe
No need to install anything, it seems to run fine.
So, until Jessie releases, running
On 01/29/2015 02:08 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Stephen wrote:
On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
Or if you don't want to build it by hand, you may do something
t
Stephen wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to
>> mess with.
> Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite
> adventurous but I can handle not playing VV until Je
On 01/29/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
If you are a novice user, the glibc is the _last_ thing you want to mess
with.
Grüße,
Sven.
Hmm, that is scary. I don't want to break anything. I am quite
adventurous but I can handle not playing VV until Jessie releases if
that is the
Stephen wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
>> Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
>> Or if you don't want to build it by hand, you may do something
>> tricky:
On 01/29/2015 07:59 PM, Stephen wrote:
>
> On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
>> Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
>
>> Or if you don't want to build it by h
On 01/29/2015 10:46 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
Or a custom glibc installed in an isolated prefix, then playing with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to load the new glibc.
Or if you don't want to build it by hand, you may do something tricky:
extracting the Jessie package by hand in, again, an iso
5' not
>> found (required by ./x86/libSDL2-2.0.so.0)"
>
>> I tried looking for glibc 2.15 in the software repository but could
>> find no such package. How do I satisfy this dependency then?
>
> You need at least Debian Jessie/Testing für a glibc new enough.
>
&g
Stephen wrote:
> I'm trying to run the game VV on my system but whenever I try and
> launch it I get the following error: "./x86/vv.x86:
> /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not
> found (required by ./x86/libSDL2-2.0.so.0)"
>
I'm trying to run the game VV on my system but whenever I try and
launch it I get the following error: "./x86/vv.x86:
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found
(required by ./x86/libSDL2-2.0.so.0)"
I tried looking for glibc 2.15 in the
fore considering downtimes and patching activities on
> > > > production servers
> > > > read these:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
> > > >
> > > > espe
; >>> especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not
> >>> vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc.
> >>
> >> Indeed, however you will notice that the list on the second link does
> >> not contain exim, the defau
ftware which is not
>>> vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc.
>>
>> Indeed, however you will notice that the list on the second link does
>> not contain exim, the default SMTP server software for debian. This was
>> used for proof-of-concept code.
>>
&
> read these:
> > >
> > > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
> > >
> > > especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not
> > > vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc.
> >
> > Indeed, however you wi
; > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
> >
> > especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not
> > vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc.
>
> Indeed, however you will notice that the list on the second link does
> not contain
vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc.
Indeed, however you will notice that the list on the second link does
not contain exim, the default SMTP server software for debian. This was
used for proof-of-concept code.
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/274
Cheers
Iain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
before considering downtimes and patching activities on production servers
read these:
https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283
especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not
vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc
Hey all,
For those that do not know about this yet, seems that glibc has a
nasty bug in it that should probably be patched. Wheezy and squeeze
vulnerable, but all you bleeding edge folk should be ok as Jessie and
sid seems fine
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-0235
Hi Sven,
> This is not too worrying since the 2.6.16 kernel has been unsupported
> since 2008, and 2.6.16.27 is even two years older.
Sure, for debian it is fine - however for me, being limited to that
old kernel, it is a showstopper.
Granted, the use-case is rather obscure ;)
> Probably. To pa
t; any way to patch a debootstrapped debian installation with a self-compiled
> glibc that is compatible with older kernel versions?
Probably. To patch eglibc for supporting older kernels, change the
MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED variable in debian/sysdeps/linux.mk and update the
check in debian/debhe
(binary wlan driver blob,
texas instrument`s patched OMAP source tree, ancient toolchain), is there
any way to patch a debootstrapped debian installation with a self-compiled
glibc that is compatible with older kernel versions?
I reason I ask is because the minimum kernel version also seems to be
st checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparently I'd
>>>> have
>>>> to use ANOTHER DISTRO to get a glibc less than 18 months old.
>>>
>>> Maybe first read the thread starting at
>>>
>>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/07/msg00466.
On Lu, 10 sep 12, 09:06:56, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
> I can't speak for others, but if I really needed a newer glibc that
> bad, I wold probably add Ubuntu to my sources.list, and make
> a hybrid. For glibc, you might end up pulling in a lot of packages...
>
> Later, when
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:36AM +0100, Brian wrote:
>> On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>>
>> > Never mind, I just checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparently I'd
>> > have
>
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 05:12:35PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>> Some non-packaged software, e.g. the BOINC client, requires a
>> relatively recent version of glibc.
There always be some package that requires some version f
//lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/07/msg00466.html
> >
> > A thread in which someone says the only way to proceed is to file a bug
> > against glibc, and another gives a way to reach the glibc team?
>
> And a third mentions a bug is already opened.
And the bug is appar
ays the only way to proceed is to file a bug
> against glibc, and another gives a way to reach the glibc team?
And a third mentions a bug is already opened.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:36AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> > Never mind, I just checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparently I'd have
> > to use ANOTHER DISTRO to get a glibc less than 18 months old.
> >
&g
On 09/09/2012 02:12 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
> Some non-packaged software, e.g. the BOINC client, requires a relatively
> recent version of glibc.
BOINC 7.0.27 migrated to wheezy about a month ago (and is thus listed on
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=boinc ). Before then, I was
usi
On Sun 09 Sep 2012 at 19:00:33 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> Never mind, I just checked and Sid is also running 2.13. Apparently I'd have
> to use ANOTHER DISTRO to get a glibc less than 18 months old.
>
> Really?
>
> Developers: really?
>
> I gauess the only way
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 05:12:35PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> Some non-packaged software, e.g. the BOINC client, requires a relatively
> recent version of glibc.
>
> Wheezy, the latest non-unstable version of Debian, is stuck at 2.13,
> released 1.5 years ago, and since it is frozen
Some non-packaged software, e.g. the BOINC client, requires a relatively
recent version of glibc.
Wheezy, the latest non-unstable version of Debian, is stuck at 2.13,
released 1.5 years ago, and since it is frozen there won't be a new glibc
available for some undetermined amount of time pro
On 2012-06-08, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> unopkg done.
>> *** glibc detected ***
>> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/../ure-link/bin/uno.bin:
>> double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x7fdf68000fb0 ***
>
> (...)
>
>> Don't k
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:00:00 +, Curt wrote:
> 31 updates today for me, running squeeze, the following message in my
> xterm at installation end:
>
> unopkg done.
> *** glibc detected ***
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/../ure-link/bin/uno.bin:
> doub
31 updates today for me, running squeeze, the following message in my
xterm at installation end:
unopkg done.
*** glibc detected ***
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/../ure-link/bin/uno.bin:
double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x7fdf68000fb0 ***
=== Backtrace
Hello list,
currently I'am migrating a PureFTPD ftp server installed on old SuSE to
Debian Squeeze.
The passwords in the SuSE pureftpd.passwd are hashed with crypt() blowfish.
As I read ahead it seems like that Debians glibc isn't supporting blowfish
via crypt(), but the source code o
JoeHill ha scritto:
What?
I've definitely never seen this before. I'm running a Testing system myself and
Flash works fine (well, to the extent that Flash can ever be said to work
'fine').
On a Testing system I just installed, however, I'm getting an error that:
ERR
a Testing system I just installed, however, I'm getting an error that:
>
> ERROR: Your glibc library is older than 2.3.
>Please update your glibc library.
When and how (console message, pop-up window, ...) do you get this error
message?
> I've applied all updates sinc
What?
I've definitely never seen this before. I'm running a Testing system myself and
Flash works fine (well, to the extent that Flash can ever be said to work
'fine').
On a Testing system I just installed, however, I'm getting an error that:
ERROR: Your glibc
The installation end in Error 2 as shown in the captured output included
below.
My system is Lenney with a 2.6.26-1-amd64 stock kernel. I installed the
debian glibc-source_2.7-13.all.deb package, unpacked
glibc-2.7ds1.tar.bz2 into /usr/src/gnu/glibc-2.7, created
/usr/src/gnu/glibc-build and from
hce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using linux-2.6-glibc23-i686 in FC6 box to compile audio and
> video application, what is the equivelant glibc I can use in Debian?
>
> I searched following result, could not find similar glibc23 package.
>
> $ apt-cache search glibc
Try s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/08 06:57, hce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using linux-2.6-glibc23-i686 in FC6 box to compile audio and
> video application, what is the equivelant glibc I can use in Debian?
>
> I searched following result, could not find simil
Hi,
I am using linux-2.6-glibc23-i686 in FC6 box to compile audio and
video application, what is the equivelant glibc I can use in Debian?
I searched following result, could not find similar glibc23 package.
$ apt-cache search glibc
abicheck - binary compatibility checking tool
glibc-doc - GNU
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:13:48AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:14:54PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
[..]
> >
> > As I said, I am at home with fdisk and parted. And can boot from
> > knoppix and copy a whole partition off when I need to, whereas knoppix
> > doesn't
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:14:54PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:25:02PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >
> > What warnings did you get about LVM? It is rather nice to be able to
> > resize partitions, but also migrate partitions of of failing drives. On
> > all my o
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:25:02PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> What warnings did you get about LVM? It is rather nice to be able to
> resize partitions, but also migrate partitions of of failing drives. On
> all my old boxes (that are still new enough to run Debian), drive
> failures sta
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 07:14:02PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:22:59PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:16:34PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > I hope you kept backups and if not, make a full set before you do
> > anything else. That is,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:22:59PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:16:34PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > Silly situation: I have been wanting to release my etch install from
> > the LVM so as to be able to adjust the partitioning. The arrangement
[...]
> > Problem
own initrd. I saw in aptitude that
whilst you were in the midst of problem number 1?
> linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 was available (the current kernel was
> 2.6.18-5-686). But this also failed to install, so I tried to remove it
> prior to finding the relevant glibc. The removal failed too:
&g
root, and let the install make its own initrd. I saw in aptitude that
linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 was available (the current kernel was
2.6.18-5-686). But this also failed to install, so I tried to remove it
prior to finding the relevant glibc. The removal failed too:
/usr/bin/perl: /lib/tls/i686/cmov
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 07:00:53AM -0800, Morfys wrote:
> I would like to copy glibc/libgcc (in particular, libc.so.
> 6,libgcc_s.so.1) for a 32bit machine onto a 64bit machine. Would
> using the 32bit glibc/libgcc on the 64bit machine work?
> The reason I ask is that I've
Hi,
I would like to copy glibc/libgcc (in particular, libc.so.
6,libgcc_s.so.1) for a 32bit machine onto a 64bit machine. Would
using the 32bit glibc/libgcc on the 64bit machine work?
The reason I ask is that I've been getting the following error:
Bin/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_out_of_memory, ve
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2008-01-11 23:37 +0100, David Fox wrote:
>
>> On 1/11/08, Kum Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Does somebody know something easy method of upgrading GLIBC to version 2.4
>>> from 2.3.6 without upg
On 2008-01-11 23:37 +0100, David Fox wrote:
> On 1/11/08, Kum Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does somebody know something easy method of upgrading GLIBC to version 2.4
>> from 2.3.6 without upgrading Etch to Lenny?
>
> I don't see it - and likely the
On 1/11/08, Kum Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does somebody know something easy method of upgrading GLIBC to version 2.4
> from 2.3.6 without upgrading Etch to Lenny?
I don't see it - and likely there would be too many breakages. You're
better off doing a dist-upgr
Hello!
Does somebody know something easy method of upgrading GLIBC to version 2.4
from 2.3.6 without upgrading Etch to Lenny?
thanks,
--
Kum Gabor
www.kumgabor.hu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 10 January 2008 22:04, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/10/08 12:56, Kum Gabor wrote:
> > Hello All!
> >
> > I tried to set up my SiS672 video on my Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo v5515
> > notebook. I found a driver for Ubuntu, but I have the following problem:
> >
> > dlopen: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/li
On 01/10/08 12:56, Kum Gabor wrote:
Hello All!
I tried to set up my SiS672 video on my Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo v5515
notebook. I found a driver for Ubuntu, but I have the following problem:
dlopen: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.4' not found (required
by /usr/lib/xorg/modules/
Hello All!
I tried to set up my SiS672 video on my Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo v5515
notebook. I found a driver for Ubuntu, but I have the following problem:
dlopen: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.4' not found (required
by /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/sis_drv.so)
(Libc version on E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/22/07 09:14, Daniel Santos wrote:
> I searched packages.debian.org and the description is similar. GNU C
$ apt-cache show glibc
W: Unable to locate package glibc
E: No packages found
> library. Why are they different packages ?
lib
I searched packages.debian.org and the description is similar. GNU C
library. Why are they different packages ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 2007-05-24 15:13:28, schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
> Why on earth would you update glibc without just upgrading the rest of
> the system?
The half system conflict with 2.5 and an "apt-get dist-update" will
leave your system unusable... it remove dpkg before glibc 2.5 is
installe
of the source. I don't have binary
packages available. I'll proceed with the question again after a
while.
I gave up on the recursive non-sense and went on to download enough
binary packages to be able to build glibc from source. Thanks for your
attempts at helping me.
--
my place on
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:27:53PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> I had the same problem with my Devel-Station and my Laptop to get
> glibc 2.5 running. It took me over 2 days to get all dependencies
> in the right order.
>
Why on earth would you update glibc without just upg
1 - 100 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
