On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:27:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 28 January 2015 13:25:20 i...@thargoid.co.uk wrote: > > On 2015-01-28 12:27, Peter Viskup wrote: > > > before considering downtimes and patching activities on production > > > servers > > > read these: > > >
> > > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/283 > > > > > > especially the second link mention network-facing software which is not > > > vulnerable due to proper sanitization out of glibc. > > > > Indeed, however you will notice that the list on the second link does > > not contain exim, the default SMTP server software for debian. This was > > used for proof-of-concept code. > > > > http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/274 > > So Wheezy users who use Exim are at risk? But it surely then follows that > Wheezy users who do not use Exim, or even have it installed, are not at > risk? > > > https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3142 But I see anyway that it has been patched for Wheezy. So all is OK. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201501281429.42835.lisi.re...@gmail.com
