Info. I'll look for another IP table manager.
> I'm always open to suggestions.
>
> On 09/29/2015 04:55 PM, Alex Vong wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> You are lucky not to able to install it! firestarter contained a grave
>> bug that will make booting impossib
Hi Paul,
You are lucky not to able to install it! firestarter contained a grave
bug that will make booting impossible
<https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772715>. Besides,
the package was being abandoned by the upstream developers
<https://packages.qa.debian.org/f/firesta
gt;Thanks for all possible answers
>
> From the Debian description at [1]:
>
> "Firestarter is no longer developed and is missing some critical
> features such as IPv6 support, so users may be advised to look into
> more modern alternatives such as gufw.
2013/12/1 Andreas Rönnquist
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 13:31:28 +0100,
> Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
>
> >Why?
> >
> >Thanks for all possible answers
>
> From the Debian description at [1]:
>
> "Firestarter is no longer developed and is missing some critical
>
On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 13:31:28 +0100,
Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
>Why?
>
>Thanks for all possible answers
From the Debian description at [1]:
"Firestarter is no longer developed and is missing some critical
features such as IPv6 support, so users may be advised to look into
more moder
Why?
Thanks for all possible answers
On 10/27/2010 07:23 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
I'm inclined to call it a bug in firestarter, but to be sure, test it
out with Network Manager instead of wicd. See if you have the same
problem. I think you will, which will indicate the problem is with
firestarter (or possibly with the wa
ce eth0 inet static
> -------8<
>
> For grins, I reconfigured /etc/network/interfaces on one of the single
> network profile systems and, sure enough, firestarter fails to launch
> the firewall. If I switch back to a
iface eth0 inet static
---8<
For grins, I reconfigured /etc/network/interfaces on one of the single
network profile systems and, sure enough, firestarter fails to launch
the firewall. If I switch back to a normal interfaces file, the
On 10/24/2010 07:45 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:20:59PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
This is a pretty sophisticated firewall front end, allowing for
connection sharing and allowing you to limit service connections to
specific IP addresses or IP address ranges, but it's not
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:20:59PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> This is a pretty sophisticated firewall front end, allowing for
> connection sharing and allowing you to limit service connections to
> specific IP addresses or IP address ranges, but it's not working
> reliably for me. And
On 10/23/2010 02:38 PM, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
...
I'm guessing I should try to run firestarter in the Pre-connection
Script field first, and then fall back to using the Post-connection
Script field if Pre-connection fails.
Now I just have to decide which of the firestarter scripts it
The fields are:
Pre-connection Script
Post-connection Script
Pre-disconnection Script
Post-disconnection Script
I'm guessing I should try to run firestarter in the Pre-connection
Script field first, and then fall back to using the Post-connection
Script field if Pre-connection fails.
Now I
On 10/23/2010 12:15 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
Starting Network connection manager: wicd.
startpar: service(s) returned failure: firestarter ... failed!
Running scripts in rc2.d/ took xx seconds.
Ah, you're using wicd. For
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
> Starting Network connection manager: wicd.
> startpar: service(s) returned failure: firestarter ... failed!
> Running scripts in rc2.d/ took xx seconds.
>
Ah, you're using wicd. For each network conn
On 10/23/2010 08:16 AM, Rob Owens wrote:
What if the network isn't up when firestarter is asked to start? Would
it start anyway? Would it fail to start and log an error? Or would it
fail silently?
I'm not sure of the answers to the above. Maybe you could try shutting
down yo
On 10/23/2010 04:57 AM, Greg Madden wrote:
Runlevel 2 is the default runlevel.
Look for a link: '/etc/rc2.d/Sxxfirestarter -> ../init.d/firestarter'
Hi, Greg.
Thanks to you and Rob I'm getting a bit of an education.
I found /etc/rc2.d/S19firestarter. It does not contai
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:03:59PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> As root I ran
>
> /etc/init.d/firestarter start
>
> and I got
>
> Starting the Firestarter firewall
>
> I ran
>
> iptables -L
>
> and I could see that iptables is properly doing "it
llivan wrote:
> >>>> Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not
> >>>> started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly see
> >>>> something about it scrolling by, but I never get a chance to read it.
> >&g
On 10/22/2010 07:42 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2010 14:57:15 Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not
started) at
On 10/22/2010 08:18 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:48:34PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
There is an /etc/init.d/firestarter file and an
/etc/firestarter/configuration file (that later one being present in its
directory with a whole bunch of other files.).
After a fresh
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:48:34PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
> There is an /etc/init.d/firestarter file and an
> /etc/firestarter/configuration file (that later one being present in its
> directory with a whole bunch of other files.).
>
After a fresh reboot, with firestar
On Friday 22 October 2010 14:57:15 Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
> > On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> >> Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not
> >> started) at differen
On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not
started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly see something
about it scrolling by, but I never get a chance
I want
in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the
Firestarter user interface during a given session. Once I log off
(restart not necessary) the rules are apparently reset to the default.
You can check this by running (as root):
iptables -L
If there are no firewall rules
On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not
> started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly see something
> about it scrolling by, but I never get a chance to read it.
You can use &#x
in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the
>>> Firestarter user interface during a given session. Once I log off
>>> (restart not necessary) the rules are apparently reset to the default.
>>>
>> You can check this by running (as root):
>&
On 10/22/2010 01:56 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:50:11PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
list's moderator hasn't got back to me. It appears that the rules I want
in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the
Firestarter user interface duri
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:50:11PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> list's moderator hasn't got back to me. It appears that the rules I want
> in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the
> Firestarter user interface during a given session. Once I l
I'm running Firestarter 1.0.3 on Debian testing (both systems involved
in this message).
A number of months ago I was in a situation where I wanted to establish
an SSH connection from my notebook to a desktop system. Because the
network on which this desktop system resides is less
Todd A. Jacobs wrote at 2009-11-10 14:30 -0600:
> I'm not really looking for a static firewall builder (e.g. fwbuilder or
> lokkit), but something that approximates the "allow/deny current
> traffic" features of firestarter.
I am new to netfilter, etc. and have been do
I really like using firestarter, as the realtime traffic logs and
allow/deny interface are exceedingly useful to me. However, I know that
it's been dead upstream for a long time, and I was hoping someone knew
of a well-maintained replacement.
I'm not really looking for a static firewa
Daryl Styrk wrote:
I'm attempting to bridge wlan0 with eth0. I've done this successfully
in the past with firestarter and dhcp3-server. However I'm running into
some issues trying to set this up now.
What I have done in the past is set eth0 static, and enabled internet
connec
I'm attempting to bridge wlan0 with eth0. I've done this successfully
in the past with firestarter and dhcp3-server. However I'm running into
some issues trying to set this up now.
What I have done in the past is set eth0 static, and enabled internet
connection sharing in fire
On Fri January 16 2009, Jeff Soules wrote:
> Personally, I do this:
>
> Ensure that you have your firewall rules set up as you wish them.
> Then, edit /etc/network/interfaces to add the following:
>
> # Bring up firewall
> pre-up iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.rules
>
> # And save fw state on shu
b server, so
>> I
>> could share photos. nginx & gallery2 are working just fine, easy to setup and
>> use! The problem is, I just rebooted, and I have to rerun the iptables
>> command to open port 80 for my web server again. I see there is firestarter
>> on my system b
web server, so I
> could share photos. nginx & gallery2 are working just fine, easy to setup and
> use! The problem is, I just rebooted, and I have to rerun the iptables
> command to open port 80 for my web server again. I see there is firestarter
> on my system but it isn't runn
e is firestarter
on my system but it isn't running, and I don't think I ever set it up. All I
want is for my web port rule to start every time I boot, but I can't find
anywhere in the system where iptables is saved, or where to put this one line
rule so it starts every time.
wiki.deb
On 04/09/2008 10:24 PM, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
Hi there,
I installed firestarter on Debian Etch. From my understanding it is
pretty much a front end to the ipstarter firewall. Everything has
been going great except for one minor annoyance...
Every time I connect to the campus network I
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 08:24:40PM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I installed firestarter on Debian Etch. From my understanding it is pretty
> much a front end to the ipstarter firewall. Everything has been going great
> except for one minor annoyance...
...
&
Hi there,
I installed firestarter on Debian Etch. From my understanding it is pretty much
a front end to the ipstarter firewall. Everything has been going great except
for one minor annoyance...
Every time I connect to the campus network I get bombarded with broadcast SMB
packets...fro my
On Sun December 2 2007, Darko wrote:
> > Kmenu - Debian - Applications - Network - Monitoring - FIRESTARTER
>
> This part is missing
>
> Monitoring - FIRESTARTER
someone mentioned installing the application call menu:
sudo aptitude install menu
then run update-menus
if firest
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote:
try going to the start
menu-Debian-applications-network-monitoring-firestarter
I got your same error when I try it from a konsole, but it works from the
menu
But where from the menu i can't find it on my kde if i try
Darko wrote:
snip
But where from the menu i can't find it on my kde
Install the package 'menu', then after any apt update/upgrade, type
'update-menus' while still at the command line and firestarter is one of
the many packages that conform to that requirement.
On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote:
> > try going to the start
> > menu-Debian-applications-network-monitoring-firestarter
> >
> > I got your same error when I try it from a konsole, but it works from the
> > menu
>
> But where from the menu i can't fi
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote:
You normally don't need --reinstall, that causes the package to be fully
removed before reinstallation.
I did and i cant start it from default user and after su it says:
(firestarter:) gtk warning canot open di
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:37:15 +, Darko wrote:
> Patter wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:50:11 +0100, Michael Pobega wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote:
>>>
>>>> I deinstaled gnome and now I can&#x
On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote:
> > You normally don't need --reinstall, that causes the package to be fully
> > removed before reinstallation.
> >
> >
>
> I did and i cant start it from default user and after su it says:
> (firestarter:) gtk warnin
Patter wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:50:11 +0100, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote:
I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to
run it under KDE
apt-get install --reinstall firestarter
You nor
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:50:11 +0100, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote:
>> I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to
>> run it under KDE
>>
>>
>
> apt-get install --reinstall firesta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote:
> I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to
> run it under KDE
>
>
apt-get install --reinstall firestarter
- --
If programmers deserve to be rewa
Darko wrote:
I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to
run it under KDE
Just reinstall it.
It should drag in all the libs necessary to run it without having to run
a full Gnome install.
I don't have a full Gnome desktop, I simply don't need it.
I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to
run it under KDE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:50:17 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > 70MB is *huge* amount of data to install *only* to have a gui. IMHO
> > firestarter is only useful if you already have X installed, though
&
e small grey things from ufos),
> some stuff from X, too.
>
> That is the reason why I talk about ca. 70 MB.
> FireStarter is small. But to start the gui, the
> system wants some other files.
> At least, I thought so until now.
>
> When I say "apt-get install firestar
Andreas writes:
> Do I understand you right, that I do not have to download these X-files,
> if I intend to export the display to another computer ?
You need some libraries but no X-server. Firestarter 1.0.3-1.3
dependencies:
libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.2),
l
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:51:48AM +0100, Andreas Duffner wrote:
>
> Do I understand you right, that I do not have to
> download these X-files, if I intend to export the display
> to another computer ?
>
> That would be really nice.
>
You need the xbase-clients package at a very minimum. You ss
t the ones with the small grey things from ufos),
some stuff from X, too.
That is the reason why I talk about ca. 70 MB.
FireStarter is small. But to start the gui, the
system wants some other files.
At least, I thought so until now.
When I say "apt-get install firestarter" it will
get fir
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> 70MB is *huge* amount of data to install *only* to have a gui. IMHO
> firestarter is only useful if you already have X installed, though this
> is a bad idea on a server.
You could run X on another system. People te
Andrei Popescu wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall.
With firestarter? How?
[snip X11 forwarding stuff]
If *that* isn't shooting a fly with a canon, than I don't know what
is.
[snip rant against console users]
You *really* do not
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:09:10 +0100
Andreas Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >>>> I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall.
> >>> With firestarter? How?
> >
> > [snip X11 forwarding stuff]
> >
> &g
Andrei Popescu wrote:
I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall.
With firestarter? How?
[snip X11 forwarding stuff]
If *that* isn't shooting a fly with a canon, than I don't know what is.
Mmm. So why do you use shorewall at all ? It is like using a pistol
against
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:03:51 +0100
Andreas Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall.
> >
> > With firestarter? How?
[snip X11 forwarding stuff]
If *that* isn't shooting a fly with a canon, than I don't
On 1 Mar 2007 08:41:10 -0800, Jordi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
I saw two good firewalls:
- Firestarter wich is easy
- Shorewall wich seems versatile
Wich is best for a single server pc? Does the complexity of shorewall
worth the effort or is firestarter as good as shorewall?
Sho
Andreas Duffner writes:
> WebInterface...
So you have a Web server running on your firewall. Not good.
> ...so you do not *have* to install some software.
You wouldn't have to install software to use ssh.
> [QOS] would be really cool. I'd like to have it.
Linux already has it.
--
John Hasler
I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall.
With firestarter? How?
On my side in
/etc/ssh/ssh_config (that is for the client)
ForwardX11 yes
that way you dont have to say ssh -X bla bla
on the other side in
/etc/ssh/sshd_config (that is for the server)
X11Forwarding yes
Then I
Jordi wrote:
Anyway, please give me opinions about the router by SMC Networks:
7904WBRA2
http://www.smc.com/index.cfm?event=viewProduct&localeCode=EN_USA&pid=1588
First I have no wide knowledge of routers. I only know some.
But I can tell you what I think while reading the data sheet.
Perhaps i
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:25:12 +0100
Andreas Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I just want a working firewall.
> And firestarter does this job.
> I do not know about complex setups with multiple servers.
> I am just using one server, client etc at the time.
> The firew
Thanks Andreas.
I agree with most that you said, as I am very pragmatic on my needs.
I think I will buy the router I said, wich looks a very strong router
from security point of view, and plus install firestarter and some
other utility if I need.
And things sometimes are not so complex. For
Peter writes:
> Or, if you like ease of use (great web based GUI)...
I do not want a Web server running on my router.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3-mrt-2007, at 14:52, John Hasler wrote:
Jordi writes:
To have a good hardware firewall buy a good router-switch or a
specific
hardware device.
To have a good hardware firewall buy a cheap used pc, install Linux
on it,
and configure it as a router and firewall.
--
Or, if you like eas
Jordi writes:
> To have a good hardware firewall buy a good router-switch or a specific
> hardware device.
To have a good hardware firewall buy a cheap used pc, install Linux on it,
and configure it as a router and firewall.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:08:36AM +, David Hart wrote:
>
> If you need to manage a half-dozen zones the chances are that you'll
> be doing packet filtering on specialized hardware so shorewall will
> be of no use.
>
Well, chances are you don't know what you are talking about. Please go
look
Jordi wrote:
I saw two good firewalls:
- Firestarter wich is easy
- Shorewall wich seems versatile
Wich is best for a single server pc? Does the complexity of shorewall
worth the effort or is firestarter as good as shorewall?
I can only tell about firestarter. Perhaps it helps a bit.
First
Thanks for the links
I asked in the Ubuntu forum too and they say me that it may be
unnecessary to combine hardware firewall and software firewall
(iptables or any other that uses it).
But they said I can do, if I am paranoid.
And as you said, the correct place to stop an intruder is BEFORE they
c
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:08:36AM +, David Hart wrote:
> On Thu 2007-03-01 16:05:32 -0500 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:45:41PM +0100, Franck Joncourt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:56:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > John, that seems to complicated
On Thu 2007-03-01 16:05:32 -0500 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:45:41PM +0100, Franck Joncourt wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:56:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> > >
> > > John, that seems to complicated for me, but seems good as it is a
> > > hardware firewall.
> > > Rove
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:25:33PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:41:10AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I saw two good firewalls:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jordi wrote:
> Oh yes,
>
> I will take all that is said in exam, and learn all to some degree.
> But I have so much work on Java, php, and virtual reality modelling
> languages, plus build the site, so I think I better build a simple
> server, as stro
Oh yes,
I will take all that is said in exam, and learn all to some degree.
But I have so much work on Java, php, and virtual reality modelling
languages, plus build the site, so I think I better build a simple
server, as strong as I can. But can't spend months or years learning,
I need to start d
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:45:41PM +0100, Franck Joncourt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:56:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> > I take note, John and Roberto.
> >
> > John, that seems to complicated for me, but seems good as it is a
> > hardware firewall.
> > Roverto, seems you like to do a control
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:56:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> I take note, John and Roberto.
>
> John, that seems to complicated for me, but seems good as it is a
> hardware firewall.
> Roverto, seems you like to do a control of all parameters, you must be
> an expert. I will try to do as you say, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:41:10AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I saw two good firewalls:
>> - Firestarter wich is easy
>> - Shorewall wich seems versatile
>>
>> Wich is bes
I take note, John and Roberto.
John, that seems to complicated for me, but seems good as it is a
hardware firewall.
Roverto, seems you like to do a control of all parameters, you must be
an expert. I will try to do as you say, and learn a bit.
Thanks for your opinions.
Jordi
On 1 mar, 19:50, "R
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:50:02AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> I saw that shorewall can have a GUI if I also install Webmin.
>
> Is Webmin a good tool to install? has some kind of disavantage? Is it
> better to not use webmin?
>
Personally, I don't like webmin as it insulates too much from you. If
you
Jordi> I saw two good firewalls:
Jordi> - Firestarter wich is easy
Jordi> - Shorewall wich seems versatile
Just to be contrary, I like and use m0n0wall (http://www.m0n0.ch) at
home in a WRAP board. Very nice, very quiet, plenty of performance.
Nice web based interface, boots off comp
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:41:10AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Hello
>
> I saw two good firewalls:
> - Firestarter wich is easy
> - Shorewall wich seems versatile
>
> Wich is best for a single server pc? Does the complexity of shorewall
> worth the effort or is firestarter as
I saw that shorewall can have a GUI if I also install Webmin.
Is Webmin a good tool to install? has some kind of disavantage? Is it
better to not use webmin?
Thanks
Jordi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Roberto
I will do then the effort and try to install and use Shorewall.
Jordi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:41:10AM -0800, Jordi wrote:
> Hello
>
> I saw two good firewalls:
> - Firestarter wich is easy
> - Shorewall wich seems versatile
>
> Wich is best for a single server pc? Does the complexity of shorewall
> worth the effort or is firestar
Hello
I saw two good firewalls:
- Firestarter wich is easy
- Shorewall wich seems versatile
Wich is best for a single server pc? Does the complexity of shorewall
worth the effort or is firestarter as good as shorewall?
Just this
Thanks
Jordi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks to both Florian Kulzer and John Fleming. Both answers work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 21:09:14 -0500, Default User wrote:
> Very strange.
>
> I installed Firestarter on Debian Stable (i386). It is picking up the
> routine periodic dhcp send events from my router, and sending them to to
> the tty consoles, where they overwrite part of the
- Original Message -
From: "Default User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 10:09 PM
Subject: Firestarter bug?
Very strange.
I installed Firestarter on Debian Stable (i386). It is picking up the
routine periodic dhcp send events from my router,
Very strange.
I installed Firestarter on Debian Stable (i386). It is picking up the
routine periodic dhcp send events from my router, and sending them to to
the tty consoles, where they overwrite part of the screen. These are
the same as what shows up in the Firestarter "events" scr
This behavior occurs on boxes behind a router with
only one interface. The problem is in the firestarter
control script (/etc/firestarter/firestarter.sh) and
fixed by fixing up the $BCAST variable after testing
some other variables to make a best guess about
whether or not the machine is behind a
With the default setting of "Block broadcasts from
external network", machines on the local net (using
SAMBA) never get NetBIOS broadcasts answered for the
local network, so the other machines and even the
Linux machine itself cannot find the Linux host.
On Linux nmblookup fails to find itself. I
..
What I now realise I am after is just an applet that produces a
reassuring icon in the system tray that shows the state of the firewall.
I do not need the Firestarter GUI to be running if there is any other
way of doing this. In the mean time, when I get round to it (it won't
be for a we
Well, of course, Firestarter is not the firewall, iptables is. I do not
see how to check whether iptables is running - maybe it runs all the
time as much of it is in the kernel and running Firestarter merely
updates the configuration. However, it can clearly be in a stopped
condition
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:50:01PM +0100, John Talbut wrote:
> Thanks for the further ideas, Ken.
>
> Firestarter certainly does not seem to be starting on bootup. Using ps
> as root gives no entries for Firestarter after booting, whereas it does
> once I get Firestarter to
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
