Den 15. mars 2016 21:38, skrev deloptes:
I agree with you more or less, however languages like python or perl
open doors to pretend-to-be-programmers. I've seen more often bad
python/perl code than c/c++. My observations are also that there is
always a penalty, even if you compile the script
On 03/17/2016 01:58 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:38:04 +0100 deloptes wrote:
Martin Read wrote:
On 15/03/16 07:45, deloptes wrote:
I see recently more python code written than real C/C++.
So what? Most programs *shouldn't* be written in C or C++, and I say
this as someone
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:38:04 +0100 deloptes wrote:
> Martin Read wrote:
>
> > On 15/03/16 07:45, deloptes wrote:
> >> I see recently more python code written than real C/C++.
> >
> > So what? Most programs *shouldn't* be written in C or C++, and I say
> > this as someone who loves C and C++ and
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:45:33 +0100 deloptes wrote:
> Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:58:00 +0100 deloptes
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Adam Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >> > If you're referring to the great "should" debate, then this is a
> >> > pretty inaccurate description of what happened.
Adam Wilson wrote:
>> I agree with you more or less, however languages like python or perl
>> open doors to pretend-to-be-programmers. I've seen more often bad
>> python/perl code than c/c++.
>
> C/C++ arrogance at its best! I could maybe understand it if you called
> C# or Java users pretend-to-
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:06:55 -0400 doug
wrote:
>
> On 03/15/2016 12:22 PM, Martin Read wrote:
> > On 15/03/16 07:45, deloptes wrote:
> >> I see recently more python code written than real C/C++.
> >
> > So what? Most programs *shouldn't* be written in C or C++, and I
> > say this as someone who
On 03/15/2016 05:28 PM, Joe wrote:
I first came to Pascal after a couple of years of BBC Basic, and I
couldn't see what the fuss was about. Pascal didn't seem to be any
great advance, though I suppose it was much more useful than the
Applesoft I learned on.
I had an original garage build ][. I
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:06:55 -0400
doug wrote:
> >
> >
> It's too bad that the original Borland Pascal is not around anymore.
> Or even the later version of BASIC with the case statement. Simple
> and even a doppus like me could write with one of them!
>
I first came to Pascal after a couple
Martin Read wrote:
> On 15/03/16 07:45, deloptes wrote:
>> I see recently more python code written than real C/C++.
>
> So what? Most programs *shouldn't* be written in C or C++, and I say
> this as someone who loves C and C++ and reaches for one of them by
> default as the language for solving c
On 03/15/2016 12:22 PM, Martin Read wrote:
On 15/03/16 07:45, deloptes wrote:
I see recently more python code written than real C/C++.
So what? Most programs *shouldn't* be written in C or C++, and I say
this as someone who loves C and C++ and reaches for one of them by
default as the langu
On 15/03/16 07:45, deloptes wrote:
I see recently more python code written than real C/C++.
So what? Most programs *shouldn't* be written in C or C++, and I say
this as someone who loves C and C++ and reaches for one of them by
default as the language for solving computing problems. (Unless t
Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:58:00 +0100 deloptes wrote:
>
>> Adam Wilson wrote:
>>
>> > If you're referring to the great "should" debate, then this is a
>> > pretty inaccurate description of what happened. I inadvertently
>> > used the word "should" as opposed to "it would be be
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:58:00 +0100 deloptes wrote:
> Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > If you're referring to the great "should" debate, then this is a
> > pretty inaccurate description of what happened. I inadvertently
> > used the word "should" as opposed to "it would be better
> > if" (insert other no
Adam Wilson wrote:
> If you're referring to the great "should" debate, then this is a pretty
> inaccurate description of what happened. I inadvertently used the word
> "should" as opposed to "it would be better if" (insert other
> non-triggering alternative if it suits), and was promptly jumped by
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:46:08 + Lisi Reisz
wrote:
> On Saturday 12 March 2016 07:50:49 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > So. Now I'll bite off my tongue and take my ball with me. I'm off
> > this thread. I can't bear the overall animosity and poking of
> > fun at those who try to put some effort int
15 matches
Mail list logo
