Patrick Wiseman :
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Allan Wind
> wrote:
>
> > On 2009-01-18T17:33:04, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Are test messages really so common and burdensome that you can't
> > > ignore them?
> >
> > I find it inconsiderate of the sender to use a mailing list, with
> > thousa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allan Wind wrote:
> I find it inconsiderate of the sender to use a mailing list, with
> thousands(?) of subscribers, for presumably testing his personal mail
> configuration. As such my preference is to automate processing of such
> messages as I a
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2009-01-18T17:33:04, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Are test messages really so common and burdensome that you can't
> > ignore them?
>
> I find it inconsiderate of the sender to use a mailing list, with
> thousands(?) of subscribers, for presumably
On 01/18/2009 07:22 PM, Allan Wind wrote:
On 2009-01-18T17:33:04, Ron Johnson wrote:
Are test messages really so common and burdensome that you can't
ignore them?
I find it inconsiderate of the sender to use a mailing list, with
thousands(?) of subscribers, for presumably testing his personal
On 2009-01-18T17:33:04, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Are test messages really so common and burdensome that you can't
> ignore them?
I find it inconsiderate of the sender to use a mailing list, with
thousands(?) of subscribers, for presumably testing his personal mail
configuration. As such my prefere
On Sunday 18 January 2009 22:44:32 Allan Wind wrote:
> Is there a way to configure the mailing list software such that test
> messages are automatically treated as unsubscribe requests? If not
> does anyone have a canned maildrop rule to do so?
If you are using mutt, just use mailfiler and delete
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 06:33:04PM EST, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/18/2009 04:44 PM, Allan Wind wrote:
> >Is there a way to configure the mailing list software such that test
> >messages are automatically treated as unsubscribe requests? If not does
> >anyone have a canned maildrop rule to do so
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:44:32PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> Is there a way to configure the mailing list software such that test
> messages are automatically treated as unsubscribe requests?
Yes, as the list is run using procmail filters (smartlist). Refer to
the archives for the many reasons
On 01/18/2009 04:44 PM, Allan Wind wrote:
Is there a way to configure the mailing list software such that test
messages are automatically treated as unsubscribe requests? If not does
anyone have a canned maildrop rule to do so?
Are test messages really so common and burdensome that you can't
Is there a way to configure the mailing list software such that test
messages are automatically treated as unsubscribe requests? If not does
anyone have a canned maildrop rule to do so?
/Allan
--
Allan Wind
Life Integrity, LLC
http://lifeintegrity.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-use
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dave Thayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:41:08PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>
>
>>
>>cat <>outfile
>>Some words
>>EOF
>>
>>
>>works but when it is embedded inside an if-then-fi construct like,
>>
>>
>>AAA=&
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:41:08PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>
> cat <>outfile
> Some words
> EOF
>
>
> works but when it is embedded inside an if-then-fi construct like,
>
>
> AAA=""
> if [ -z "$AAA" ]; then
>cat <&
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:41:08PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> if [ -z "$AAA" ]; then
>cat <>outfile
>EOF
> fi
Remove indentation before EOF or use <<" EOF".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I ran into this problem which I cannot figure out. I must have missed
something. I'm using sid with bash version 3.1.5(1).
cat <>outfile
Some words
EOF
works but when it is embedded inside an if-then-fi construct like,
AAA=""
if [ -z "$AAA" ]; then
Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2005, 07:59 -0500 schrieb Martin McCormick:
> tar zxf otherfilesystem/root.tar.gz, things seemed to start for a
> while and then disaster!!!
>
>
> gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
> tar: Read 4489 bytes from /mnt/root.tar.gz
Some days ago I had a similar problem.
tar
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:35:55AM +0200, Almut Behrens wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 07:59:09AM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> >
> > gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
> > tar: Read 4489 bytes from /mnt/root.tar.gz
> >
> > Apparently a special file or something in / makes gzip stop
>
Almut Behrens writes:
>I'm afraid your tarball got corrupted... In that case - I'm sorry to
>say - you're almost certainly outta luck. After creating a tar.gz
>file, the _whole_ tarfile has been piped through gzip, so if any part
>of the file gets corrupted afterwards (however tiny - a single bit
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 07:59:09AM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
>
> gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
> tar: Read 4489 bytes from /mnt/root.tar.gz
>
> Apparently a special file or something in / makes gzip stop
> before decompressing most of the 900 MB file. Is there any way to
> cause
before rebuilding a system after an upgrade that went terribly wrong,
I did the following in order to save kernel sources and configuration files:
tar cf - . |gzip >../otherfilesystem/root.tar.gz
This worked fine on the home file system and I recovered all
the /home files but when I went
Simon Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to detect that a file has stopped copying via FTP. As an
> example: User sending a file via FTP (100MB), cron job to test if the file
> has completed and then launch a command to do something with that file.
You could just keep checking the
Hi There,
I am trying to detect that a file has stopped copying via FTP. As an
example: User sending a file via FTP (100MB), cron job to test if the file
has completed and then launch a command to do something with that file.
Like a 'watch folder' type thing. How can i find out if the file has
co
g up mozilla-browser (1.6-2) ...
> > Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome: line
> > 68: une
> > xpected EOF while looking for matching `}'
>
> There is a typo in /usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome.
> Just open up the file in your favorite t
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Nick Lidakis wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Nick Lidakis wrote:
Running unstable debian here, and after a dselect update, dselect
install:
[SNIP]
Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome:
line 68: une
xpected EOF while looking for matching
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:36:28 -0500
Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> May I ask how you knew about this? Did I not Goggle properly?
>
> Many thanks on your solution.
Googling only works if something's been around long enough for them
to find it and index it. Since we just started see
Nick Lidakis wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Nick Lidakis wrote:
Running unstable debian here, and after a dselect update, dselect
install:
[SNIP]
Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome:
line 68: une
xpected EOF while looking for matching `}'
[SNIP]
There is a ty
0B of additional disk space will be used.
> >>Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> >>Setting up mozilla-browser (1.6-2) ...
> >>Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome:
^^^
> >>l
.
> NL> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> NL> Setting up mozilla-browser (1.6-2) ...
> NL> Updating mozilla chrome
> NL> registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome: line
> NL> 68: une
> NL> xpected EOF while looking for matching `}'
>
> Open the file /us
Thursday, March 11, 2004, 9:30:13 PM, Nick Lidakis wrote:
NL> Running unstable debian here, and after a dselect update, dselect install:
NL> I have Google'd, and can't seem to find anything relevant. I also tried
NL> removing all of the mozilla packages using dpkg -P, and reinstalling; I
NL>
registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome: line
NL> 68: une
NL> xpected EOF while looking for matching `}'
Open the file /usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome .
Change lines 68 & 69 from
-start-
touch ${LIBDIR]/chrome/user-skins.rdf
touch ${LIBDIR]/chrome/user-locales.rdf
-end-
to
not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Setting up mozilla-browser (1.6-2) ...
Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome:
line 68: une
xpected EOF while looking for
.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Setting up mozilla-browser (1.6-2) ...
Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome: line
68: une
xpected EOF while looking for matching `}'
dpkg: error processing mozilla-br
removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Setting up mozilla-browser (1.6-2) ...
Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome: line
68: une
xpected EOF while looking for matching `}'
There
0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Setting up mozilla-browser (1.6-2) ...
Updating mozilla chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-chrome: line
68: une
xpected EOF while looking for matching `}'
dpkg: error processing mo
files nothing prints out.
--
Joseph
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 18:24, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joseph wrote:
> > However, the cd-drivers.img & net-drivers.img are giving me an error:
> > EOF on net-drivers.img etc.
>
> Tell us the real error message, not a paraphrased fragment. I
Joseph wrote:
> However, the cd-drivers.img & net-drivers.img are giving me an error:
> EOF on net-drivers.img etc.
Tell us the real error message, not a paraphrased fragment. I have my
suspecions, but I will not speculate without a real error message,
sorry.
--
see shy jo
sig
rs.img net-drivers.img root.img
However, the cd-drivers.img & net-drivers.img are giving me an error:
EOF on net-drivers.img etc.
I use the command to write the floppies:
dd if=file.img of=/dev/fd0 bs=1024 conv=sync ; sync
The images from testing branch from Jan. have their own problem re
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 06:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Try CTRL + Z
Wouldn't that be more a CP/M thing?
--
-
Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jefferson, LA USA
Some former UNSCOM officials are alarmed, however. Terry Taylor,
a
El domingo, 21 de septiembre de 2003, a las 07:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribe:
> Try CTRL + Z
Try CTRL + D
Try disappearing from my inbox... :P
Regards, Ismael
--
"Tout fourmille de commentaries; d'auteurs il en est grande cherté"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Try CTRL + Z
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was rumoured to have said about
`` enexpected EOF problem '':
> Although I have only used vi to edit a file, I keep getting this when I
> execute it:
>
> /etc/iptables.sh: line 247: sy
On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 03:53:31PM +, Pollywog wrote:
> Although I have only used vi to edit a file, I keep getting this when I
> execute it:
>
> /etc/iptables.sh: line 247: syntax error: unexpected end of file
Some pieces of software expect a linefeed on the last line and break if
there
Although I have only used vi to edit a file, I keep getting this when I
execute it:
/etc/iptables.sh: line 247: syntax error: unexpected end of file
I don't see anything there that could be causing the problem.
Is there a way to see and remove whatever character is doing this?
thanks
--
A
Thanks for the response. The problem, as mentioned by several on this
list, was a bug in the devtps.sh file; there was a "{" where a "}"
should have been (or vice-versa).
Bruce Sass wrote:
>
> > I don't have a /devpts line in /etc/fstab, on any of my
> > boxes. Is this something I need? What does
> I don't have a /devpts line in /etc/fstab, on any of my
> boxes. Is this something I need? What does it do?
I really don't know anything about it.
I've been testing the boot floppies and noticed this in /etc/fstab:
# Uncomment the following entry if you use a 2.2.x or newer kernel for
# UNIX98-
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Sass wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if the /devpts line being commented out in /etc/fstab has
> > anything to do with the problem.
> >
> > --
> > On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Kent West wrote:
> >
> > > When booting a Potato box, I'm getting the error:
> > > ./devp
Bruce Sass wrote:
>
> I wonder if the /devpts line being commented out in /etc/fstab has
> anything to do with the problem.
>
> --
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Kent West wrote:
>
> > When booting a Potato box, I'm getting the error:
> > ./devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error: unexpected end of file
> > y
I wonder if the /devpts line being commented out in /etc/fstab has
anything to do with the problem.
--
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Kent West wrote:
> When booting a Potato box, I'm getting the error:
> ./devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error: unexpected end of file
> yet the file appears to be fine. I don't
When booting a Potato box, I'm getting the error:
./devpts.sh: line 63: syntax error: unexpected end of file
yet the file appears to be fine. I don't even know what
"devpts" is or does.
Anyone know how to fix this error?
Thanks!
: unexpected EOF in netscape... internal format violated
The first time I thaught I had probably ended wget badly, something
like using Ctrl-\ rather than Ctrl-C.
But the second time I stopped it by doing a
kill -SIGINT (wget process ID). Oh, I need to do that because I am
launching it from an at
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Jan Krupa wrote:
> Could someone please tell how can I insert under
> Linux (debian2.0) EOF (end of file) sign (in C lang.) from keyboard?
> I mean what sequence of keys ?
CTRL-D
Sincerely,
Ray Ingles (248) 377-7735 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Kendall P. Bullen wrote:
: On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Jan Krupa wrote:
:
: > Could someone please tell how can I insert under
: > Linux (debian2.0) EOF (end of file) sign (in C lang.) from keyboard?
: > I mean what sequence of keys ?
:
: Er, insert it where?! In E
>> "JK" == Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JK> Could someone please tell how can I insert under
JK> Linux (debian2.0) EOF (end of file) sign (in C lang.) from keyboard?
JK> I mean what sequence of keys ?
Control D is eof.
Ciao,
Martin
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Jan Krupa wrote:
> Could someone please tell how can I insert under
> Linux (debian2.0) EOF (end of file) sign (in C lang.) from keyboard?
> I mean what sequence of keys ?
Er, insert it where?! In EMACS, you would press control-Q control-D
(^Q^D) to insert a contr
Ctrl-d
>>> Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/1/98 9:24:42 AM >>>
Could someone please tell how can I insert under
Linux (debian2.0) EOF (end of file) sign (in C lang.) from keyboard?
I mean what sequence of keys ?
Thanks
Jan
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Jan Krupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Could someone please tell how can I insert under
| Linux (debian2.0) EOF (end of file) sign (in C lang.) from keyboard?
| I mean what sequence of keys ?
Under most circumstances ^D is considered the EOF mark.
Gary
Could someone please tell how can I insert under
Linux (debian2.0) EOF (end of file) sign (in C lang.) from keyboard?
I mean what sequence of keys ?
Thanks
Jan
>> "CB" == Christopher Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CB> So can I send the EOF character with the keyboard?
CTRL d
Ciao,
Martin
^d :-)
--
from a 1996 Microshit ad campaign:
"The less you know about computers the more you want Micro$oft!"
Hi all,
Say I have command 'foo' that takes a file 'bar' as input and does
something useful with it and is run like this:
$ foo < bar
Now foo expects EOF to stop accepting input and to exit and when
filtering in files as in the example above everything is perfect but fo
On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 01:14:47AM -0400, SEGV wrote:
> This used to work and bring up NT Loader. I know I have reinstalled since
> then,
> but why would I get this, and how would I fix it? The relevant conf entry is:
>
> image=/dev/hda1
> label=Microsoft
Should be
other=/dev/hda1
Hamish
--
SEGV wrote:
> This used to work and bring up NT Loader. I know I have reinstalled since
> then,
> but why would I get this, and how would I fix it? The relevant conf entry is:
>
> image=/dev/hda1
> label=Microsoft
>
My lilo.conf says:
other = /dev/hda1
label = dos
table = /dev/hda
for
For the last few months I have been getting this error when using the
"Microsoft" entry of my /etc/lilo.conf:
Loading Microsoft
Unexpected EOF
Loading Microsoft
Unexpected EOF
Loading Microsoft
Unexpected EOF
...
until I hit CTRL.
This used to work and bring up NT Loader. I k
tape with
eof marks in between, and an eot at the end. Tar by default writes several
file blocks followed by two eof marks.
...++..++.++*
^^^ ^^ ^file blocks
^^ ^^ ^^ 6 eof marks (2/file by convention
s Dec 96 6 cd set, and was disappointed that
> > mt(1) limitations were not lifted.
> >
> > Summary:How can I read and write multiple archives on a floppy tape?
> > Is anyone writing multiple archives on a Travan floppy tape?
> >
> > Problem:mt -f /dev/nrft
) limitations were not lifted.
>
> Summary:How can I read and write multiple archives on a floppy tape?
> Is anyone writing multiple archives on a Travan floppy tape?
>
> Problem:mt -f /dev/nrft0 eof
> reports "Operation not permitted"
> I u
tiple archives on a floppy tape?
Is anyone writing multiple archives on a Travan floppy tape?
Problem:mt -f /dev/nrft0 eof
reports "Operation not permitted"
I understood that this was a limitation of linux 1.2.13 but not
of linux 2.0.6.
66 matches
Mail list logo
