On Tue 19 Oct 2021 at 11:09:04 -0400, Peter Hoist wrote:
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseProposals
> >
>
> Great list, contains a lot of what I have to say.
Almost all from 10+ years ago. Things have moved on during that time.
Maybe the annonynous author has too. Don't expect that page's
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseProposals
>
Great list, contains a lot of what I have to say.
The fact that debian is laser focused on stable, and does not officially
encourage using testing as a rolling release (as evidenced from a couple
replies to this email chain), yet there are still peop
On Lu, 18 oct 21, 12:29:55, Peter Hoist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am enjoying Debian's testing branch as a reasonably stable and up-to-date
> 'rolling' release, and I have to say it satisfies all my desires, almost.
> The one thing that bothers me is that every two years, the unstable/testing
> branches
19 Oct 2021, 05:29 by a...@cityscape.co.uk:
> On Mon 18 Oct 2021 at 20:51:04 +0200, harrywea...@tutanota.com wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 19 Oct 2021, 03:13 by g...@wooledge.org:
>>
>> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:29:55PM -0400, Peter Hoist wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am enjoying Debian's testing branch as a reaso
On Mon 18 Oct 2021 at 20:51:04 +0200, harrywea...@tutanota.com wrote:
>
>
> --
> Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox.
>
>
>
> 19 Oct 2021, 03:13 by g...@wooledge.org:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:29:55PM -0400, Peter Hoist wrote:
> >
> >> I am enjoying Debian's testing br
--
Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox.
19 Oct 2021, 03:13 by g...@wooledge.org:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:29:55PM -0400, Peter Hoist wrote:
>
>> I am enjoying Debian's testing branch as a reasonably stable and up-to-date
>> 'rolling' release,
>>
>
> It's not.
>
>> So the
Peter Hoist wrote:
> I am enjoying Debian's testing branch as a reasonably stable and up-to-date
> 'rolling' release
That's not what it is.
> , and I have to say it satisfies all my desires, almost.
> So the question is, why not cut a release branch every two years, and at
> the same time keep t
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:29:55PM -0400, Peter Hoist wrote:
> I am enjoying Debian's testing branch as a reasonably stable and up-to-date
> 'rolling' release,
It's not.
> So the question is, why not cut a release branch every two years, and at
> the same time keep the unstable/testing alive?
Y
Hi,
I am enjoying Debian's testing branch as a reasonably stable and up-to-date
'rolling' release, and I have to say it satisfies all my desires, almost.
The one thing that bothers me is that every two years, the unstable/testing
branches are frozen to certain extent because of the stable releases
9 matches
Mail list logo
