Re: Call for help on making a LILO bootscreen for Etch

Andrés Roldán wrote: > I'd thank any Debian user that will be > willing to create a DFSG-compliant image to merge it with the LILO > package for Etch. While you're at it, the CD artwork on http://www.de.debian.org/CD/artwork/ looks a bit outdated as well, with most CD cover pictures featuring 'woo

Call for help on making a LILO bootscreen for Etch

Hi all, the LILO package for Debian has been using bootscreens for each distribution. Currently there is a bootscreen for woody, sarge and sid but there is not one for etch. I'd thank any Debian user that will be willing to create a DFSG-compliant image to merge it with the LILO package for Etc

Re: EFF call for help against restrictive patents

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 06:48:12PM +, Richard Lyons wrote: > EFF is trying to bust some more patents. In brief one is a patent on > virtual domains, I think more or less as implemented by Apache for I don't > know how long. Details are here: >

(OT) EFF call for help against restrictive patents

EFF is trying to bust some more patents. In brief one is a patent on virtual domains, I think more or less as implemented by Apache for I don't know how long. Details are here: and more on the Patent Busting Project is here:

Re: Call for help: TiMidity++ aRts users

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Marco Correia wrote: > I'm having trouble with arts+timidity. Someone that is used to ARTS really should spend some time improving the ARTS support in TiMidity++, it basically sucks... > TiMidity++ version 2.13.2 > kde 3.3 > Gentoo Linux Unless gentoo uses the debian packag

Re: Call for help: TiMidity++ aRts users

hi, I'm having trouble with arts+timidity. If I use arts and timidity -Os it says that it cannot open the pcm device, but I assume that is the expected since arts is already using it. If I use -Or, then timidity loads successfully but I cannot here any sound when I play a midi file with timid

Call for help: TiMidity++ aRts users

This is a call for help of all TiMidity++ users that use it with aRts mode (KDE). I have just uploaded a TiMidity++ release to unstable (2.13.2-3) that tries to fix some troublesome aRts issues. It will go into testing in 10 days, if everyhing is alright with the dependencies. I am very

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 12:24:51AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: | on Wed, Mar 27, 2002, Elizabeth Barham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: | > =?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX | > > XX COTE D' IVOIRE | > > TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX | | | | > What

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

on Wed, Mar 27, 2002, Elizabeth Barham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > > XX COTE D' IVOIRE > > TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX > What are you all's opinion of this letter? Did anyone else respond to > the others? Is any

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:32:13PM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > * Elizabeth Barham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > ... > > I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning the civil > > unrest in Nigeria and the plot of smuggling funds into the United > > States, but the recipient fail

Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:15:41PM +, Patrick Kirk uttered: --> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:40:14PM +0100, wrote: --> >>From -IReturn-Receipt-To: --> --> I shouldn't respond to this junk but did anyone else find themselves laughing at the improbable tale of the general, his proivate jet and

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On 27 Mar 2002, Elizabeth Barham wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > > XX COTE D' IVOIRE > > TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX > > [snip for confidentiality] > > I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning the civil > unrest in Niger

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:41:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote: > At 03:59 PM 03/27/02 -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote: > >=?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > >> XX COTE D' IVOIRE > >> TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX > > > >[snip for confidentiality] > > >

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:07:22PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:59:04PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote: > > > =?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > > > > XX COTE D' IV

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:59:04PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > > XX COTE D' IVOIRE > > TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX > > [snip for confidentiality] > > I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning th

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:59:04PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote: > > =?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > > > XX COTE D' IVOIRE > > > TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX > > > > [snip for confidentiality] > > > > I

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

At 03:59 PM 03/27/02 -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote: >=?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX >> XX COTE D' IVOIRE >> TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX > >[snip for confidentiality] > >I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning the civil >unrest in Nige

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:59:04PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > > XX COTE D' IVOIRE > > TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX > > [snip for confidentiality] > > I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning the c

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

* Elizabeth Barham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: ... > I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning the civil > unrest in Nigeria and the plot of smuggling funds into the United > States, but the recipient failed to respond. They probably added your e-mail address to one of those "2

Re: [OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:59:04PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote: > I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning the civil > unrest in Nigeria and the plot of smuggling funds into the United > States, but the recipient failed to respond. Have a look at

[OT] Re: CALL FOR HELP

=?iso-8859-1?q?=20?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FROM: MRS MARYAM XXX > XX COTE D' IVOIRE > TEL:XXX- XX-XX-XX-XX [snip for confidentiality] I responded to a similar letter a while back concerning the civil unrest in Nigeria and the plot of smuggling funds into the United States, bu

Re: CALL FOR HELP

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:40:14PM +0100, wrote: >>From -IReturn-Receipt-To: I shouldn't respond to this junk but did anyone else find themselves laughing at the improbable tale of the general, his proivate jet and "singing" agreements? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

CALL FOR HELP

FROM: MRS MARYAM BANGA. ABIDJAN COTE D' IVOIRE TEL:225- 07-81-48-06 HELLO: In a matter of fact, though we still do not known each other very well but due to lack of time, I am being mandated to disclose to you the transaction at sake which needs urgent attention and co-operation from a tru

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

Hi Doug; I would suggest that you do through the debian-user and debian-devel message archive lists (ie: on debian.org). You have probably "been hit" by the "perl problem". An "apt-get upgrade" may or may not (at this point) bring things to a "sane" point. Those of us that are using "potato"

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 10:48:53PM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote: > > The error messages during the configureation of setserial said that my > modules needed to be updated and to run > "update-module force" and run configure again. Well, I did this and the These days the Debian way is to crea

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

hello, i am new to this list, and love debian. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote: > Thanks for all of the help! > > I ended up removing the ne module and replaceing it with the io=0x300 irq=3 > specified in

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

Thanks for all of the help! I ended up removing the ne module and replaceing it with the io=0x300 irq=3 specified in the options. I can now telnet to my system, so I think its fixed! I will check it out the rest of the way in the morning, Doug THANK YOU! Doug Jim wrote: > The easiest way

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

On 07/17/99 11:59 PM, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote: > Ok, > > I went into modconf and select "net" and "ne". > > It said that this module was currently installed on my system. It gave me > two choices, > > Exit or Remove the module from the kernel. > Where do I specify the io-0x300? I do not see

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

Ok, I went into modconf and select "net" and "ne". It said that this module was currently installed on my system. It gave me two choices, Exit or Remove the module from the kernel. Where do I specify the io-0x300? I do not see anywhere in the modconf that allows me to edit anything. Doug J

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

The easiest way for us to fix this would be by running modconf. Hopefully nothing else is broken (which we'll find out soon). As root, run: modconf Then go to "net" and then "ne" and enable the module for your card. The reason you aren't detecting the card? modprobe will generally only detect

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

Thanks for the reply. I am not sure if I was using module or kernel for the network card. I have had this system for awhile (potato is the third debian distrubution I have used, and the network settings were setup at the very beginning. How would I tell? The current kernel version seems to be 2

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

On 07/17/99 10:48 PM, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote: > Hello, I hope someone can help me with this. It seems like it should > not to hard to fix, but without any knowledge of how or where the > network services are started / initialized, I don't think I will figure > it out without help. > Hmm. I;m

Re: 3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

Thanks for the reply Jim! I have a standard NE2000 card (cheap one I got for about $20). Everything was working fine until my last moves that I described below. My network was working after the potato upgrade until I "fixed" the last two problems taht dselect caused. I rebooted, and the netwo

3rd Call for help - Lost network card after Potato Upgrade

Hello, I hope someone can help me with this. It seems like it should not to hard to fix, but without any knowledge of how or where the network services are started / initialized, I don't think I will figure it out without help. I upgraded my slink system to potato using dselect about a week ago.