When you use the "Reply to all" button in Gmail, check the addresses
before hitting "Send"
Tao
--
http://huangtao.me/
http://www.google.com/profiles/UniIsland
2010/6/20 Tn 4dm1n :
> una cosa tienes que tener en cuenta que para que lso menus se acomoden a la
> resolucion del pantalla de 32 de pu
stá igual que antes,
> es seguro que algo se desconfiguró pero no se donde..
> Heeelp!!..
>
> --
> Jhonatan Castro.
> www.jhtan.com
> jh.ta...@gmail.com jh...@acm.org jht...@hotmail.com
> @jhtan en Twitter e Identi.ca
> www.facebook.com/jh74n
> www.twitter.com/jht
Внимание! Организуем поездку на бой Кличко против Гомеса (21 марта, Штуттгарт).
Поддержи своего любимого спортсмена!
КИев: 044~492~92~94
Штуттгарт (для групп и турфирм): +49~40~209~341~590
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Mon, 2005-28-11 at 21:06 +0100, Manou J.M. Eifes wrote:
> I only want to know, if there is someone who has a backup of the old Debian
> 1.3.1 ISO files (binary and source). I need it for an intern backup server
> for old Debian distributions.
>
> Greetings,
> Manou
>
>
>
I went digging -
Hi, Andy.
On Nov 28 2005, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> I have them here. I can put them up on my machine - but I only
> have 256k upload bandwidth - I'd also need to set up some sort
> of account for you or some ftp. What is easiest?
Perhaps you should contact the people in charge of archive.debian
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:06:40PM +0100, Manou J.M. Eifes wrote:
> I only want to know, if there is someone who has a backup of the old Debian
> 1.3.1 ISO files (binary and source). I need it for an intern backup server
> for old Debian distributions.
>
> Greetings,
> Manou
>
>
>
> --
> To
I only want to know, if there is someone who has a backup of the old Debian
1.3.1 ISO files (binary and source). I need it for an intern backup server
for old Debian distributions.
Greetings,
Manou
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Am 2005-11-25 09:17:36, schrieb Rogério Brito:
> Heh, it's cool to have old hardware running well. :-) And not only that,
> but it is also a good way of "benchmarking" the current programs (say,
> glibc against libc4 or libc5).
>
> And building a (statically built, as you woulnd't probably want t
Good morning!
No 386's here, but I have two 486 SX25's with 8MB memory each and 80MB to
120MB HDs that I have been trying to figure out how to get Debian onto.
Some ideas here: http://www.linux.ca/library/linux/minideb.shtml although
you would have to strip out some of the apps.
Also, this
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Understood. Where is all this interest in really old versions of Debian
coming from? At this rate I'll bring a 386 with 4M to the next Linux
Expo in London _because I can_ :)
No 386's here, but I have two 486 SX25's with 8MB memory each and 80MB
to 120MB HDs that I hav
On Nov 25 2005, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:44:50AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > I would think that something like jigdo or a torrent would be more
> > helpful for the community, of course.
>
> Jigdo is only relevant if the archive is still around to build images
> from
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:44:50AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Nov 24 2005, Manou J.M. Eifes wrote:
> > Does anyone have the Debian 1.3.1 CD 1 ISO (and perhaps the CD 2)? I
> > know there is a copy of Debian 1.3.1 on archive.debian.org but, if
> > possible, I want the original ISOs. There is n
On Nov 24 2005, Manou J.M. Eifes wrote:
> Does anyone have the Debian 1.3.1 CD 1 ISO (and perhaps the CD 2)? I
> know there is a copy of Debian 1.3.1 on archive.debian.org but, if
> possible, I want the original ISOs. There is no problem for
> downloading the files, because I have a fast ADSL conne
Does anyone have the Debian 1.3.1 CD 1 ISO (and perhaps the CD 2)? I know
there is a copy of Debian 1.3.1 on archive.debian.org but, if possible, I
want the original ISOs. There is no problem for downloading the files,
because I have a fast ADSL connection.
Cheers,
Manou
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hello all.
I'm looking for an archive (á la archive.debian.org) of the
non-us part of bo. So far I've found dregs of one at wuarchive,
but AFAICT pieces are missing: the Packages file lists
apache-common apache-ssl bzip cfs crypt++el des-solnet mutt-i
pgp-i pgp-us rsaref sa
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:05:00PM -0700, awilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Dear debian-user,
^^^
> I have an X11 application running on Solaris. The application
^^^
> Is there a solution to t
Dear debian-user,
I have an X11 application running on Solaris. The application
window
has pulldown menus. When the application gets to the end of a run,
it
pops up a dialog to ask if you want to save the data. If no menu
is
pulled down, the appl
ding to a newer version of Debian? A search on
> "libdl" with dselect of the available bo packages turned up nothing, but
> I suppose libdl is included implicitly in another package.
You find out which package a file is in by doing the following :
funkiest:/home/paul# dpkg -S l
ystem is 1.8.12. Is there a way
to upgrade without upgrading to a newer version of Debian? A search on
"libdl" with dselect of the available bo packages turned up nothing, but
I suppose libdl is included implicitly in another package.
Thanks and regards
Tom Kuiper
p.s. In case you wo
I did this at work for a while. I ran VMware with Win98 as the guest OS on a
Celeron 466 with lots of ram, (somebody else was using this system), and
displayed it to my measly memory-strapped Pentium 166. It worked quite well,
except it wouldn't let me do full screen VMWare.
On 15-Mar-2000 Brad w
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:18:44PM -0600, rich wrote:
> total network newbie here,
>
> I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use
> as an x-terminal to connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is
> potato appropriate for a 486? I have an old
rich wrote:
>
> total network newbie here,
>
> I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use
> as an x-terminal to connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is
> potato appropriate for a 486? I have an old cd of bo that I thought
> would work
-33
> with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use as an x-terminal to
> connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is potato
> appropriate for a 486? I have an old cd of bo that I thought
> would work on the 486, but would I be able to connect to the
&
[ netscape comes up in i486's X server ]
i don't see why this wouldn't work well, since most of the processing is
on the pentium and there's presumably a fast LAN connecting the two.
Potato should work fine on the 486, and is probably more secure than bo
(i don't thin
>>>>> "rich" == rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> total network newbie here, I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with
> 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use as an x-terminal to connect
> to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is potato appropriate
At 09:18 PM 3/14/00 -0600, rich wrote:
>I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use
>as an x-terminal to connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is
>potato appropriate for a 486? I have an old cd of bo that I thought
>would work on the 486, but wou
I don't see why it would make any difference. You can use your old
hardware as firewall/router/server, but don't run X clients on it. Being
an X terminal is all it will be able to do as far as running X.
total network newbie here,
I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use
as an x-terminal to connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is
potato appropriate for a 486? I have an old cd of bo that I thought
would work on the 486, but would I be able to connect to the
ebian.org/debian-archive/dists/bo/main/binary-i386/.
(The /debian directory seems to contain only current distributions.)
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://donut.mit.edu/dmaze/
"Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal."
-- Abra Mitchell
Tom Kuiper wrote:
> > Tom Kuiper wrote:
> > > Dear Joey and group,
> > >
> > > I'm sorry that my original posting was not clear. I did go to
> > > ftp://archive.debian.org/ but there is no Packages.gz file there, so
> > > dselect won't work.
> >
> > Maybe I haven't read careful enough, in that
> Tom Kuiper wrote:
> > Dear Joey and group,
> >
> > I'm sorry that my original posting was not clear. I did go to
> > ftp://archive.debian.org/ but there is no Packages.gz file there, so
> > dselect won't work.
>
> Maybe I haven't read careful enough, in that case... oups... update
> manually.
Tom Kuiper wrote:
> Dear Joey and group,
>
> I'm sorry that my original posting was not clear. I did go to
> ftp://archive.debian.org/ but there is no Packages.gz file there, so
> dselect won't work.
Maybe I haven't read careful enough, in that case... oups... update
manually.
Regards,
t; To: Tom Kuiper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: How to get bo packages?
>
> Tom Kuiper wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I'm still running `bo' and I would like to get a few additional packages.
> > 'dsel
Tom Kuiper wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'm still running `bo' and I would like to get a few additional packages.
> 'dselect' doesn't work anymore because it can't find Packages.gz anyway.
> I've poked around myself with ftp and with Netscape, and I
Greetings.
I'm still running `bo' and I would like to get a few additional packages.
'dselect' doesn't work anymore because it can't find Packages.gz anyway.
I've poked around myself with ftp and with Netscape, and I can't find
a bo distribution with a P
Francois-Nicola Demers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to install the Debian Bo distribution on my 386 with only
> 2 megs of RAM without success. Some people told me that they have been able
> to
> install it even if the machine does not have t
27;t want to upgrade by hand...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Emmanuel, France.
____
If you are upgrading a hybrid system (i.e. bo/hamm) you will need to
edit the file /etc/apt/sources.list to the locations that you want. I
will attach a copy of mine to a
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 09:58:34PM +0200, manu wrote:
> Did i make a mistake ?
>
> APT simply don't do anything useful.
> I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were
> updated.
>
> yes, i ve read the release-info.
>
> Can anyone tell me the secret ?
> Cause i really don't wa
Did i make a mistake ?
APT simply don't do anything useful.
I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were
updated.
yes, i ve read the release-info.
Can anyone tell me the secret ?
Cause i really don't want to upgrade by hand...
Thanks.
Emmanuel, France.
Did i make a mistake ?
APT simply don't do anything useful.
I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were
updated.
yes, i ve read the release-info.
Can anyone tell me the secret ?
Cause i really don't want to upgrade by hand...
Thanks.
Emmanuel, France.
rds 'lowmem'
If these disk won't work, well I think you have to compile/install it
on another computer and them changes the disk to the 386.
Good luck
Marcel Lemmen
Subject: Re: [Installing Bo Debian on a 386 2 meg RAM?]
| >
| >
| > I am sorry to send this messag
>
>
> I am sorry to send this message again if you have already received it.
It already appeared on the list.
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to install the Debian Bo distribution on my 386 with only
> 2 megs of RAM without success. Some people told me that they have been able
&
ROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Installing Bo Debian on a 386 2 meg RAM?
Hi,
I have tried to install the Debian Bo distribution on my 386 with only
2 megs of RAM without success. Some people told me that they have been able to
install it even if the machine does not have
I have sucessfully installed Hamm on a 386 w/ 3M RAM.
I down loaded a disk image from somewhere on debian.org
look for a disk image refering to "low memory".
This disk is bootable and allows you to partition your
drive (using fdisk not cfdisk) and add swap. If you
get all this worked out (patien
On Mon, 07 Jun, 1999 à 03:43:02PM -0400, Francois-Nicola Demers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to install the Debian Bo distribution on my 386 with only
> 2 megs of RAM without success. Some people told me that they have been able
> to
> install it even if the machine does not
Hi,
I have tried to install the Debian Bo distribution on my 386 with only
2 megs of RAM without success. Some people told me that they have been able to
install it even if the machine does not have the 4 meg of RAM required.
I have not been able to boot because the installation stopped saying
Brian Servis wrote:
> I think this will work.
>
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/slink/main/upgrade-older-i386/apt_0.1.10_i386-libc5.deb
thanks!
--
Mario Filipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://neptuno.sc.uevora.pt/~mjnf
*- On 12 May, Mario Jorge Nunes Filipe wrote about "Apt for bo"
> hi
>
> Is there still a bo package for apt ? Where ?
>
I think this will work.
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/slink/main/upgrade-older-i386/apt_0.1.10_i38
hi
Is there still a bo package for apt ? Where ?
Thanks
--
Mario Filipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://neptuno.sc.uevora.pt/~mjnf
Montreal Sat Jan 30 10:19:03 1999
Hey, anyone know what's going on here?:
[asimov] [/cdrom/debian/main/upgrade-i386] sudo apt-get -f dist-upgrade
Updating package status cache...done
Checking system integrity...ok
E: Internal error, ScoredFix generated breaks.
Exit 100
I'm using 0.1.
racters
> which are used to draw frames, borders etc. Instead pseudographic symbols
> the 'q', 'x' and other leters are appearing on the screen. At the same
> time everything is correct on the BO. I would like to know is it fixed in
> slink.
Don't forge
27; and other leters are appearing on the screen. At the same
time everything is correct on the BO. I would like to know is it fixed in
slink.
Thanks,
Eugene Sevinian
CRD, YerPhI, 375036, Armenia
Phone: 374-2-344873
On Mon, 16 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> P.S. Is it just me, or is the Glimpse search engine for the list Archives
> seriously bad? I can't seem to find anything interesting...
In my limited experience, I've not been impressed with the Archive search
capabilities.
--
Kent West
[EMAIL PRO
I purchased the Official 2.0 disks from Linuxpress. Here are my
experiences upgrading. Unfortunately, it was less than simple... I
hope this helps others in my situation.
First, the disks were in a strange(?) mixed Rock Ridge/joliet format. You
have to mount them with the 'nojoliet' option, like s
Hi,
when I try to apt-get update from a Bo machine I get
ERROR ftp://sylvester/pub/cdrom/debian/hamm/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
Need package libmd5-perl
Does this mean the apt-get script can't find the libmd5-perl pkg on
sylvester (the ftp server)?? I have the /etc/apt/sources.list
Hi,
Just a few q's about why I should upgrade to hamm (Debain 2.0).
Are there any issues on what software I can and can't run when doing the
libc5-libc6 upgrade? I know this is an old subject, but i've never
really got a plain english answer as to what are the issues.
I tried upgradin
Hello!
I've upgraded my bo system to hamm, and have had some problems.
Also, I have a clean new installed hamm system in another partition.
When a try to start xdm, I get a core dump and I can see in
/var/log/xdm-errors:
sh: '-c' requires an argument
I've removed, purged an
Hi,
I wonder if there are any known problems wrt the cd_upgrade.sh
script in /dists/hamm/main/upgrade-i386.
Regards,
Joey
--
There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.
*- Nathan O. Siemers wrote about "Where is Bo?"
|
| I need bo (debian 1.3) binaries of grep and ar to try and revive an
| old system before I can upgrade to hamm. Grep and ar have been lost
| :(
|
| I've seen the address of the bo site somewhere, but I just spent an
| hour look
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Nathan O. Siemers wrote:
> I need bo (debian 1.3) binaries of grep and ar to try and revive an
> old system before I can upgrade to hamm. Grep and ar have been lost
[...]
Nathan:
Here is a list of archive sites that was posted a couple of months ago.
Maybe George Bons
I need bo (debian 1.3) binaries of grep and ar to try and revive an
old system before I can upgrade to hamm. Grep and ar have been lost
:(
I've seen the address of the bo site somewhere, but I just spent an
hour looking through the web site with no success.
Thank you.
nathan
--
Nat
Lazar Fleysher writes:
> I have bo system installed and I have changed ISP and can not seem to
> configure ppp to conect to it.
Send me your scripts and the output of plog and I will try to help you.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Hello everyone,
I need an advice on how to do it.
The situation is the following:
I have bo system installed and I have changed ISP and can not seem to
configure ppp to conect to it. I can do it from a different machine and
transfer files using floppies (sorry no network...)
Could someone tell
Hi everyone,
I did not use my system for a while and now would like to upgrade it to
hamm. During this time I have changed my ISP. My current ISP uses CHAP
and I have created chap-secrets file
username * password
Changed everything in ppp.chatscript and ppp.options_out
However, I can not get
Having just updated two computers from bo to hamm, I've run into the
same problem Eric Fain described on this list a while back. It seems
I'm not the only one with this problem, so finding the solution may
prove useful for future updaters..
I used the apt upgrade and followed t
On Sat, 19 Sep 1998, Michael Stutz wrote:
> So now, every time I run apt, I get this error:
>
> Updating package status cache...done
> Checking system integrity...dependency error
> You might want to run apt-get -f install' to correct these.
> Sorry, but the following packages are broken - this m
On Sat, 19 Sep 1998, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> I'd first resolve the dependency problems by removing the packages
> with dpkg
>
> dpkg --remove wget
>
> If the prerm or postrm scripts fail, edit them to remove the problems.
> They're located in /var/lib/dpkg/info.
Thanks, it's working now -
Buffers Files Tools Edit Search Help
cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: HELP! Seriously messed up bo -> hamm
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 19 Sep 1998 21:47:46 EDT."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 19 Sep 1998, Michael Stutz wrote:
> Please help -- I really messed up my 1.3 system today trying to upgrade to
> 2.0 using the 2-cd set from LSL. I'd like to be able to find a way out of
> this mess and be able to upgrade properly rather than having to save my
> /usr/local and /etc and t
Please help -- I really messed up my 1.3 system today trying to upgrade to
2.0 using the 2-cd set from LSL. I'd like to be able to find a way out of
this mess and be able to upgrade properly rather than having to save my
/usr/local and /etc and then reinstall new...
This is what happened:
* The a
I've recovered the bo xbase, svga, and vga from a bo archive. This
was necessary, as the hamm xserver is unstable on my system; a busy
netscape, or realplayer, bring it down hard enough that it can't be
used again until after reboot. Ncurses3.0 was also necessary for xt
again.
Is there an archive where i can jump back to about three months ago? or
even to bo? This flatly wasn't a problem two months ago, and appeared
immedeiately after an upgrade of X. And now it's back on a clean
install of hamm.
rick
--
These opinions will not be those of ISU u
The slink
stuff is all dependent on libc6, and the bo (libc5) stuff there is old,
the latest ssh for bo there is ssh 1.2.22. Thanks anyway...
--
Tres Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.rap.ucar.edu/staff/tres/
Research Applications Program National Center for Atmospheric Research
Is there a bo package for ssh 1.2.26 available somewhere?
I can't seem to find one anywhere obvious. Thanks...
--
Tres Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.rap.ucar.edu/staff/tres/
Research Applications Program National Center for Atmospheric Research
*- Chris Fury wrote about "Where can I find bo packages?"
| Yeah, yeah, I know, upgrade to 2.0. I will, eventually. :)
| Right now I need to get some proggies for the gateway at work, and it's
| a 1.3 machine. Where can I find a mirror of the old stuff?
|
Check http://www.deb
Yeah, yeah, I know, upgrade to 2.0. I will, eventually. :)
Right now I need to get some proggies for the gateway at work, and it's
a 1.3 machine. Where can I find a mirror of the old stuff?
Thanks,
Chris
--
This space for rent.
> On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Pann McCuaig wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I upgraded two machines from bo to hamm. The first went well,
>> and the second was fine until I rebooted, then the network disappeared.
For some reason the `-net' option had been left off the `route add' lines
Yesterday I upgraded two machines from bo to hamm. The first went well,
and the second was fine until I rebooted, then the network disappeared.
Since I had done the whole blinking upgrade across the network and had
therefor shoved several dozen megabytes into the NIC in the hours just
preceding
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, David B. Teague wrote:
:
: Tres, and all:
:
: I find myself in the boat with Tres as well. We are trying to find a CD
: of snapshot of what 1.3.1r-most recent was. There are sites who still
: have bo, but for how long?
For what it's worth, I'm planning to keep bo
George
Thanks for the URLs for Bo. Seriously though, how
long will this distribution be out there? 6 months
would be more than enough for our needs.
David
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, George Bonser wrote:
> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
> On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Nathan E Norman
Tres, and all:
I find myself in the boat with Tres as well. We are trying to find a CD
of snapshot of what 1.3.1r-most recent was. There are sites who still
have bo, but for how long?
Would that something could be done. What do redhat and suse do about
upgrades and recent distributions
>| So, we're a few hours away from *two* weeks since hamm was officially
>| released as Debian 2.0.
>|
>| **HOWEVER**, nonus.debian.org still has stable pointed to bo and
>| hamm identified as frozen.
>|
>| Any ideas on when this will be updated?
>
>Hu
"Kevin Traas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So, we're a few hours away from *two* weeks since hamm was officially
| released as Debian 2.0.
|
| **HOWEVER**, nonus.debian.org still has stable pointed to bo and
| hamm identified as frozen.
|
| Any ideas on when this
On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Tres Hofmeister wrote:
: Where can I find the bo distribution? It seems to have
: been removed from ftp.debian.org and its mirrors. I'm definitely
: heading toward hamm; I've been running it on my desktop for a couple
: of months. But I've got 75 or
Where can I find the bo distribution? It seems to have
been removed from ftp.debian.org and its mirrors. I'm definitely
heading toward hamm; I've been running it on my desktop for a couple
of months. But I've got 75 or so Debian 1.3.1 systems to maintain in
the mean ti
So, we're a few hours away from *two* weeks since hamm was officially
released as Debian 2.0.
**HOWEVER**, nonus.debian.org still has stable pointed to bo and
hamm identified as frozen.
Any ideas on when this will be updated?
Also, incoming-non-US is pretty full of stuff, too
*- George Bonser wrote about "bo archive"
|
| There is an archive of bo at ftp.shorelink.com in /debian/bo
|
| I will post a listing of other mirrors on the ftp site as I am made aware
| of them.
There was a discussion on this on debian-devel recently, check the
list archives to see i
Hi ... trying to backup a "bo" system to another "bo" system. I'm using
dump ver 0.3-14 and cpio 2.4.2-10 .
Trying to dump or even run restore gets the error message:
'Protocol to remote tape server botched (code "sh: rmt: command not found")
.
It is better, faster, etc. All the libs except for libjpeg are rather
out of date in Bo. libungif is not there at all.
I do not have access to a Bo box or I would offer to help.
(BTW I maintain E, Imlib and Fnlib for Debian).
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /
I'm still running the crusty ol' bo (1.3.1) Debian release. I'd like
to install the Enlightenment window manager, but the only .deb package
I can find is libc6-based (and bo is libc5).
I tried installing from scratch, but that just didn't work.
Any hints?
Thanks!
--
U
I am running Bo on a Dell Laptop. I am using Kernel 2.0.33, I get random
lockups with no warning, rhyme, or reason. I don't know what it could be
exactly. I think it is related to APM, because it is usually after I take
my computer out of suspend. I will unsuspend it, type maybe 5 or 6 le
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
:
: On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
:
: > > I have still a bo-box somewhere at home, and I do not have time
: > > to upgrade it now, but I would need auctex.
: > >
: > > Is there still an ftp-server offering the b
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I have still a bo-box somewhere at home, and I do not have time
> > to upgrade it now, but I would need auctex.
> >
> > Is there still an ftp-server offering the bo-packages?
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/debi
Clemens Heuberger wrote:
>
> I have still a bo-box somewhere at home, and I do not have time
> to upgrade it now, but I would need auctex.
>
> Is there still an ftp-server offering the bo-packages?
ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/debian/dists/bo/ is recovering the latest
bo re
Hi,
I would like to know if someone knows what can cause the following error
in the linker while building a kernel (2.0 or 2.1), but no while building
apps
Any comment will be greatly appreciated,
regards
Ulisses
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/kernel/linux/ar
Jens Ritter wrote:
> I intended to say:
> for building a debhelper package (the deb) you need to install debhelper,
> which is AFAIK not possible on a bo system.
>
> Joeyh: Is this now correct?
Correct except you should be able to find the packages you need in
bo-updates to
fore posting... :-(
I intended to say:
for building a debhelper package (the deb) you need to install debhelper,
which is AFAIK not possible on a bo system.
Joeyh: Is this now correct?
Sorry again,
grimaldi
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key ID: 2048/E451C639 Jens Ritter
Jens Ritter wrote:
> Well, you may have to unpack the source by hand.
>
> Deb_helper packages (debian/rules contains dh_* entries) can´t be
> installed using dpkg (irc info).
Next time I see you on IRC I'll have to set you straight. :-) Yes, debhelper
packages, can be installed with dpkg, the bin
"Stephen J. Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 03:21:36PM +0200, Jan Menzel wrote:
[...]
> You wont really see any new packages for bo anyway now...but...
> you can always get the source from hamm and build it...its not
> tough. I would im
very well.
> So, is there a possibility to get old bo packages further?
AFAIK (I just checked the ftp site) bo apears to be gone fromt he FTP
archives. From what I know of debian...that means there probably aren't
any archives with old packages for it. (remember...disk space is always
a
1 - 100 of 471 matches
Mail list logo
