1 3600 1200 604800 10800
> ```
>
> Not sure what to make of that as I don't really understand the point and
I'm guessing [whoever did this] is trying not to stomp all over
people/orgs that are using the local. domain in DNS _and_ prevent
xxx.local. name lookups from hitting t
* 2025-06-16 00:31:48+0200, Uroš Mikanovič wrote:
> I can't get my network discovered printer to print. CUPS finds and adds
> my printer easily with "Find New Printers" on the web interface. But
> every job fails with:
> Unable to locate printer "BRNBCF4D4182ECD.local".
That reminds me of issu
On 17/06/2025 00:03, Uroš Mikanovič wrote:
`host -t SOA local` returns:
local has SOA record local. nobody.invalid. 1 3600 1200 604800 10800
It is either from your router or from your ISP. Try to add an ISP DNS
server address to the "host" command. You may try to adjust dnsmasq
configuration
Thanks for the tips, I figured something out.
Seems like mdns4_minimal is "shy". In the case of the "minimal" version
of `nss-mdns`, from the README:
> * If the request does not end with `.local` or `.local.`, it is
> rejected. Example: `example.test` is rejected.
>
> * If the request has more
On 16/06/2025 05:31, Uroš Mikanovič wrote:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns
[...]
`ping` can't resolve `BRNBCF4D4182ECD.local`, not sure if it's supposed to.
It should (while host, dig, nslookup, and other DNS tools shouldn't).
However a more direct test for libc res
Hi,
I can't get my network discovered printer to print. CUPS finds and adds
my printer easily with "Find New Printers" on the web interface. But
every job fails with:
```
Unable to locate printer "BRNBCF4D4182ECD.local".
```
While researching this problem I came across other people having tr
, that he or she has installed
professional operating system. Which is tuned and stable beginning from
The kernel and ending with provided and prepared Debian packages.
I would also like to congratulate all Debian kernel developers. Because
your work is very important. Without your exhaustive and
Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> I don't want to use set proxy in firefox and other application, but
> I want to send any packets to 127.0.0.1: and my program itself
> send to eth0.
>
> OK, there is an underlying assumption that you are not telling
> us.
>
> Why do you want to do
On Thu, 1 May 2025, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
On 4/30/25 4:29 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 10:19 AM BST, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
I want to send any packet to 127.0.0.1: and it sends my packets to
internet. my outgoing i
On 4/30/25 11:47 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
On 4/30/25 4:29 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 10:19 AM BST, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
I want to send any packet to 127.0.0.1: and it se
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
On 4/30/25 4:29 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 10:19 AM BST, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
I want to send any packet to 127.0.0.1: and it sends my packets to
internet. my outgoing interface is eth0.
You can use socat? to
Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
>On 4/30/25 4:29 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 10:19 AM BST, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
>
> I want to send any packet to 127.0.0.1: and it sends my packets
> to internet. my outgoing interface is eth0.
>
> You can
outgoing interface is eth0.
You need to set up a virtual network interface, using /dev/net/tun, and
configure it to be the default route.
Do you know any documentation?
Then you will have to encapsulate all you get from /dev/net/tun into a
packet for your program
On 4/30/25 4:29 PM, Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
On Wed Apr 30,
2025 at 10:19 AM BST, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
I want to send any packet to
127.0.0.1: and it sends my packets to internet. my outgoing
interface is eth0.
On 4/30/25 4:29 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 10:19 AM BST, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
I want to send any packet to 127.0.0.1: and it sends my packets
to internet. my outgoing interface is eth0.
You can use socat¹ to listen on a port and forward received packets
el
On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 10:19 AM BST, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
I want to send any packet to 127.0.0.1: and it sends my packets to
internet. my outgoing interface is eth0.
You can use socat¹ to listen on a port and forward received packets
elsewhere. But…
I don't want to use set proxy i
ing /dev/net/tun, and
configure it to be the default route.
Then you will have to encapsulate all you get from /dev/net/tun into a
packet for your program listening on 127.0.0.1:7777 to attach all the
headers that do not fit into UDP or TCP. But at this point you might as
well realize that your ini
Dear all,
I have a debian machine and my program listen to such as: 127.0.0.1
I want to send any packet to 127.0.0.1: and it sends my packets to
internet. my outgoing interface is eth0.
I don't want to use set proxy in firefox and other application, but I
want to send any pa
On 2025-02-27 15:59, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2025-02-14 22:00, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
All 3 systems have the linux-image-amd64 metapackage installed.
What does apt show -a linux-image-amd64 | grep -e Version -e Sources
-e Depends
return
> > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> > > > All 3 systems have the linux-image-amd64 metapackage installed.
On Sat 15 Mar 2025 at 10:44:40 (-0400), Gary Dale wrote:
> After today's upgrades, I note that RM1 showed these autoremove
>
2025-03-08[Sat]11:54 Runamile🦓Czyborra read that
2025-03-07[Fri]15:33 Maureen Thomas wrote
copied your answers into a file for me to keep on hand
thank you all for your help for this great grandmother.
Parenting a grandparent or great at grandparenting or both?
Thank you all for your help. I have copied your answers into a file for
me to keep on hand when it happens again. Again, thank you all for your
help for this great grandmother.
Moe
On 2025-02-14 22:00, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
All 3 systems have the linux-image-amd64 metapackage installed.
What does apt show -a linux-image-amd64 | grep -e Version -e Sources
-e Depends
return on each system?
If you
apt update
on
On 2024-12-23 17:43, koffie wrote:
Forwarded Message
Subject: fail message dirmanager
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
From: koffie
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Ubuntu / Oracular
Hello,
It is not possible to download an iso file.
It takes hours to get it but it doesn
On 14/02/2025 21:49, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2025-02-09 11:46, Max Nikulin wrote:
I recommend to compare
apt policy linux-image-amd64
and
apt policy
I can't see any differences between them on the various systems.
If it is true and the latest kernel is installed on all systems
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
All 3 systems have the linux-image-amd64 metapackage installed.
What does
apt show -a linux-image-amd64 | grep -e Version -e Sources -e Depends
return on each system?
If you
apt update
on each system, are there any error messages?
On 2025-02-09 11:46, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 09/02/2025 00:05, Gary Dale wrote:
VM1: /etc/apt/sources.list
I recommend to compare
apt policy linux-image-amd64
and
apt policy
I can't see any differences between them on the various systems.
that doesn't change the ABI version number. In this case, ls wouldn't
show you that there's a newer kernel installed but not yet running.
You'd have to use something like "dpkg -l linux-image\* | grep ^.i"
to see the actual package version numbers, and compare that a
On 2025-02-09 06:22, Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
On Sat, 2025-02-08 at 12:05 -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
I have a few systems running Debian/Stable (Bookworm). However the kernel version isn't always the same for some reason. After this morning's update, I noticed that 2 of the 3 systems upgraded the ke
On 09/02/2025 00:05, Gary Dale wrote:
VM1: /etc/apt/sources.list
I recommend to compare
apt policy linux-image-amd64
and
apt policy
Dis you install the package "linux-image-amd64" ? If yes, the it should always
update to the newest kernel.
(Same for package "linux-headers-amd64")
Hans
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 13:22:50 +0200, Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-02-08 at 12:05 -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> > I have a few systems running Debian/Stable (Bookworm). However the kernel
> > version isn't always the same for some reason. After this morning's update,
> > I noticed that 2 of
On Sat, 2025-02-08 at 12:05 -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> I have a few systems running Debian/Stable (Bookworm). However the kernel
> version isn't always the same for some reason. After this morning's update, I
> noticed that 2 of the 3 systems upgraded the kernel but to different
> versions. T
anadian mirrors.
/ Linux RM2 6.1.0-31-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.128-1
(2025-02-07) x86_64 GNU/Linux
/
Running |/dpkg -l | grep "^hi" / and confirming with ||/dpkg
--get-selections | grep "\
|The hardware (real and virtual) is similar in that they are all running
AMD CPUs
On 1/23/25 00:14, didier gaumet wrote:
Le 22/01/2025 à 23:41, Marco Möller a écrit :
On 1/22/25 23:23, didier gaumet wrote:
Debian provides realtime kernels in its repositories. For an AMD64 PC
and Debian 12 Bookworm (without backports), the last LTS realtime
kernel package is:
linux-image-6.
Le 22/01/2025 à 23:41, Marco Möller a écrit :
On 1/22/25 23:23, didier gaumet wrote:
Debian provides realtime kernels in its repositories. For an AMD64 PC
and Debian 12 Bookworm (without backports), the last LTS realtime
kernel package is:
linux-image-6.1.0-29-rt-amd64
Do I understand correc
On 1/22/25 23:12, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:07:57PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote:
You mean, linux-image-amd64 in bookworm-backports, which currently
draws in linux-image-6.12.9+bpo-amd64 (= 6.12.9-1~bpo12+1), can be
expected to NOT draw in some 6.13 like 6.13~rc7+1~exp1 curr
On 1/22/25 23:23, didier gaumet wrote:
Debian provides
realtime kernels in its repositories. For an AMD64 PC and Debian 12
Bookworm (without backports), the last LTS realtime kernel package is:
linux-image-6.1.0-29-rt-amd64
Do I understand correctly, that the rt-kernels like the one you
ment
Le 22/01/2025 à 23:23, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...)
DAW usage and I don not think he was not using backports)
[...)
I did not take time to read myself before posting, sorry:
"I do not think he was using backports"
is more correct ;-)
my laptop for creative audio usage (tracking,
running digital instruments, mixing, all what is commonly provided by
current Digital Audio Workstations (DAW)). For this I read and
understand that one important parameter of Linux optimization could be
to use a real time kernel, and to use some
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:07:57PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote:
You mean, linux-image-amd64 in bookworm-backports, which currently
draws in linux-image-6.12.9+bpo-amd64 (= 6.12.9-1~bpo12+1), can be
expected to NOT draw in some 6.13 like 6.13~rc7+1~exp1 currently
already having appeared in the ex
On 1/22/25 22:32, Michael Stone wrote:
I think the problem here is a misunderstanding of how backports work:
they're not "the latest kernel", they're "the latest kernel from debian
testing". You're not going to see a kernel in backports that's not going
to be in trixie until after the trixie re
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:48:24PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote:
Well, I thought that some easy receipt would pop up as an answer to my
question on how to achieve such automatic upgrades. As this did not
happen I conclude that the wished procedure is not so common and not
readily worked out by now
,
running digital instruments, mixing, all what is commonly provided by
current Digital Audio Workstations (DAW)). For this I read and
understand that one important parameter of Linux optimization could be
to use a real time kernel, and to use some other more specialized audio
related components
6.12.9 and getting 6.12.10. But
> I do not want this upgrade to step up to the 6.13 versions.
> For comfortably running the upgrades in an unattended way, I expect that I
> might need some pinning to allow all newer 6.12.x versions to become drawn
> in when available, but to not al
On 22/01/2025 03:17, Marco Möller wrote:
Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for
applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in
Bookworm Backports when doing "apt update && apt upgrade", but to not
leave the 6.12 (upstream L
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:00:49 +0100, Marco Möller wrote:
> On 1/22/25 00:10, George at Clug wrote:
> > I apologise, but I do not understand what it is you want to achieve or what
> > it is that you are asking.
> >
> > Can you please give more explanation?
>
> I want to install the currently h
the upgrades in an unattended way, I expect that
I might need some pinning to allow all newer 6.12.x versions to become
drawn in when available, but to not allow any higher kernel version than
6.12.x, so not allowing any 6.13 to become drawn in.
It seems to obvious to me, that I should not install
ates, there will be times
when you will be using a package from Testing, ... but it will be "adjusted and
recompiled for usage on Debian stable", as are all backports, which is why we
use backports and not just download a package from Testing and install it.
Maybe you are concerned that
On 1/21/25 21:39, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote:
Hello community!
Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for
applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in Bookworm
Backports when doing &quo
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Marco Möller wrote:
> Hello community!
> Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for
> applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in Bookworm
> Backports when doing "apt update &&
Hello community!
Could you please share with me, or point me to, a howto or receipt for
applying all upgrades to future kernel 6.12.x versions to appear in
Bookworm Backports when doing "apt update && apt upgrade", but to not
leave the 6.12 (upstream LTS) branch and not upgr
On 24/12/24 02:10, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 12/23/24 12:43, koffie wrote:
Forwarded Message
Subject: fail message dirmanager
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
From: koffie
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Ubuntu / Oracular
Hello,
It is not possible to download an iso fil
On 12/23/24 12:43, koffie wrote:
>
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: fail message dirmanager
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
> From: koffie
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Ubuntu / Oracular
> Hello,
>
> It is not possible to download an iso file.
From where? How
Forwarded Message
Subject: fail message dirmanager
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
From: koffie
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Ubuntu / Oracular
Hello,
It is not possible to download an iso file.
It takes hours to get it but it doesn't boot
The sha is fail permanen
" : it's as used by the
* The firmware and chipset in your machine
* The kernel interface
* Whatever the tools are in your chosen GUI/desktop environment
The first two are much more important - and largely common to all Linux
distributions, though these may vary as to kernel version.
On 11/22/24 5:33 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 04:26:05AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/22/24 12:57 AM, Michael Paoli wrote:
I recently jumped from Debian 9(w/MATE) - 12(w/MATE) in one step.
My Debian 9 settings can be traced back to Debian 6(w/Gnome).
I don't recall
ne what
you have.
> Michael mentioned https://wiki.debian.org/Suspend and I found
> https://wiki.debian.org/Hibernation .
>
> I, and other inexperienced users, need proper definitions of
> sleep/suspend/hibernate/etc to use those pages and solutions to be described
> here.
>
>
All the very best,
Andy Cater
(amaca...@debian.org)
>much as even a full second of power interruption).
>
> Yes, I have three laptops like that. And after a period of
> non-connection/use, the BIOS settings on one of them were also
> lost, eg the date/time and administrative password.
>
> > what it shows in the logs - abo
tops like that. And after a period of
non-connection/use, the BIOS settings on one of them were also
lost, eg the date/time and administrative password.
> what it shows in the logs - about all I've been able to find is this:
> but without any more details as to what's triggering
Thanks.
Still haven't found way to prevent
sleep/hibernate/etc, but FYI:
$ (cd /sys/power && grep . mem_sleep state)
mem_sleep:s2idle [deep]
state:freeze mem disk
$
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 5:15 AM wrote:
> Definitions can be found at
> https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/pm/sleep-states.html
> Ot
Thanks, my responses in-line below
(also restored some of the earlier that was removed from original,
and included full original at tail end of this email):
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 5:02 AM Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 22/11/2024 13:57, Michael Paoli wrote:
> > all network activity ceases
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Michael mentioned https://wiki.debian.org/Suspend and I found
> https://wiki.debian.org/Hibernation .
>
> I, and other inexperienced users, need proper definitions of
> sleep/suspend/hibernate/etc to use those pages and solutions to be
> described here.
Definitions c
On 22/11/2024 13:57, Michael Paoli wrote:
seems to be a very deep form of sleep, the only things I can do at that
point that at all gets it to respond:
- which does a warm reboot
Does not like suspend to RAM or suspend to disk (hibernate). It
resembles graphics issues. Can you
avior)
when I don't at all want it to, and never successfully resuming from that.
And thanks, I did also look over
https://wiki.debian.org/Hibernation
But alas, nothing there appears applicable to my issue/situation.
Anyway, maybe at some point I'll update/that/those Debian wiki pages -
On 11/22/24 12:57 AM, Michael Paoli wrote:
How do I disable all manner of sleep/suspend/hibernate on Debian 12?
[snip very detailed of his environment/symptoms]
I recently jumped from Debian 9(w/MATE) - 12(w/MATE) in one step.
My Debian 9 settings can be traced back to Debian 6(w/Gnome).
I
How do I disable all manner of sleep/suspend/hibernate on Debian 12?
I really don't want it doing any sleep/suspend/hibernate (I'm okay with
explicitly manually triggering it, but I don't even need that).
Symptoms/issue/background:
Was a non-issue on Debian 10 (sleep/hibernate woul
Actually the english version of "man apt-get" in the case of "upgrade"
writes the following:
upgrade
upgrade is used to install the newest versions of all
packages currently installed on the system from the sources enumerated
in /etc/apt/sources.list
s". However, passing a package name to
> "apt-get upgrade" results in the argument being ignored and all packages
> upgraded.
>
> Is there some reason that this is the case? Is it a bug that has
> always existed and never fixed?
I can't provoke this bug, so w
s in the argument being ignored and all packages
upgraded.
Is there some reason that this is the case? Is it a bug that has
always existed and never fixed?
Dan
;. However, passing a package name to
> "apt-get upgrade" results in the argument being ignored and all packages
> upgraded.
> Is there some reason that this is the case? Is it a bug that has
> always existed and never fixed?
It's not like dnf or zypper or urpmi. If you w
Hello Daniel,
# man apt-get
(german translation) doesn't tell anything else. apt-get upgrade
upgrades ALL installed packages.
Kind regards
Frank
Daniel Roberts:
Hello,
I've run into this a few times over the years and it can be a headache
to resolve.
Passing a package name t
ities are halted (i.e. browser,
apt, etc.). When the container dies eventually, all network is restored on
the machine. This is on my NVMe drive. If I specify the "--network host"
option, it succeeds.
With the SATA drive installation, this all succeeds as expected. The only
difference b
On 16/02/2024 23:35, Franco Martelli wrote:
On 16/02/24 at 03:03, Max Nikulin wrote:
LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=it aptitude why firefox-esr
here seems to override, tested twice with "it" and "it_IT.UTF-8":
~# env LC_ALL=C LANGUAGE=it script -T ~/test.time -a ~/test.script
You tested with
wrote:
To change programs' output messages to English LC_MESSAGES=C is often
enough. Sometimes LC_TIME and LC_NUMERIC are required too.
but it seems may have drawbacks if other variables are involved.
From the manual page of "script" command the -t option is deprecated in
favor o
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:44:21AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> > It was stated here:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/02/msg00592.html
>
> "I think that a recorded session with the output of the commands in
> English
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> It was stated here:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/02/msg00592.html
"I think that a recorded session with the output of the commands in
English is better then a localized session for debugging purposes."
I have troubl
On 16/02/24 at 13:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
In my opinion it's often too much to set LC_ALL=C because it changes
charset to ASCII (LC_CTYPE).
It depends on what you're doing, of course. If the purpose is to
normalize error messages
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> In my opinion it's often too much to set LC_ALL=C because it changes
> charset to ASCII (LC_CTYPE).
It depends on what you're doing, of course. If the purpose is to
normalize error messages so that you can report your issue to an
En
* 2024-02-15 21:17:44+0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> Doesn't LC_ALL=C setting override LANG or LANGUAGE settings?
LC_ALL overrides LC_* variables. It's easy to test:
$ locale
LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=fi
LC_CTYPE="fi_FI.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="fi_FI.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="fi_FI.UTF-8
On 16/02/2024 09:34, David Wright wrote:
Yes, LC_ALL=C will override all the locale variables,
but LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 will not:
It is documented in
2.3.3 Specifying a Priority List of Languages
(info "(gettext) The LANGUAGE variable")
https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/htm
;C.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="C.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="C.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="C.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="C.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="C.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="C.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=
$
> and LC_ALL=C override the LANG setting when used inlin
On 16/02/2024 03:17, Franco Martelli wrote:
On 15/02/24 at 03:28, Max Nikulin wrote:
LANG=C.UTF-8; LANGUAGE=; export LANG LANGUAGE
Doesn't LC_ALL=C setting override LANG or LANGUAGE settings?
Sorry, my bad. Of course
LC_ALL=C.UTF-8; LANGUAGE=; export LC_ALL LANGUAGE
and LC_ALL=C
my
system I have:
~$ env | grep LANG
LANGUAGE=
LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
and LC_ALL=C override the LANG setting when used inline of the command.
This approach is to cover all cases, my goal is to do apt/apt-get
commands output in English when they are executed into a "script"
session. Thank to
On 14/02/2024 23:11, Franco Martelli wrote:
Well, I'll go with env command syntax for shells portability. I was
asking this because I want to suggest a change to the DDP (Debian
Documentation Project) members for the releases notes documentation ¹
# env LC_ALL=C script -t 2>~/upgrade-bookworms
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:45:52PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> A new question arise spontaneously: how can csh users run a "script" saved
> session using "scriptreplay" command? In the §4.4.1 "Recording the session"
> paragraph ¹ I see this syntax:
>
> # scriptreplay ~/upgrade-bookwormstep.ti
On 14/02/24 at 17:48, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:35:59PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
On 14/02/24 at 17:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
# env LC_ALL=C script -t 2>~/upgrade-bookwormstep.time -a
~/upgrade-bookwormstep.script
That command is already using Bourne family shell synta
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:35:59PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 14/02/24 at 17:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > # env LC_ALL=C script -t 2>~/upgrade-bookwormstep.time -a
> > > ~/upgrade-bookwormstep.script
> > That command is already using Bourne family shell syntax (the 2> part)
> > so you can
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:11:55PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> Well, I'll go with env command syntax for shells portability. I was asking
> this because I want to suggest a change to the DDP (Debian Documentation
> Project) members for the releases notes documentation ¹
>
> The change I want t
ange I want to suggest is to add "env LC_ALL=C" to the "script"
command:
# env LC_ALL=C script -t 2>~/upgrade-bookwormstep.time -a
~/upgrade-bookwormstep.script
I think that a recorded session with the output of the commands in
English is better then a localized session
On 2/13/24 22:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:47:52PM -0500, Gremlin wrote:
This is from a script installed by a package that does a
dpkg-reconfigure locales to set the locale on the machine.
What package? What script?
I am working on it with a high rate a speed, should
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:47:52PM -0500, Gremlin wrote:
> This is from a script installed by a package that does a
> dpkg-reconfigure locales to set the locale on the machine.
What package? What script?
> BTW where is LANGUAGE defined in the "standards/conventions"?
It's a GNUism.
https://www
On 2/13/24 21:22, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 14/02/2024 07:56, Gremlin wrote:
Gremlin (12024-02-13):
cat /etc/default/locale
# File generated by update-locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
Found this in a shell script:
LC_ALL=$LOC LANG=$LOC LANGUAGE=$LOC update-locale LANG=$LOC
LC_ALL=
On 14/02/2024 07:56, Gremlin wrote:
Gremlin (12024-02-13):
cat /etc/default/locale
# File generated by update-locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
Found this in a shell script:
LC_ALL=$LOC LANG=$LOC LANGUAGE=$LOC update-locale LANG=$LOC LC_ALL=$LOC
LANGUAGE=$LOC
Do not do it for
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:56:46PM -0500, Gremlin wrote:
> Found this in a shell script:
>
> LC_ALL=$LOC LANG=$LOC LANGUAGE=$LOC update-locale LANG=$LOC LC_ALL=$LOC
> LANGUAGE=$LOC
In *what* shell script?
On 2/13/24 19:29, Gremlin wrote:
On 2/13/24 17:48, Nicolas George wrote:
Gremlin (12024-02-13):
Oh like debian does?
cat /etc/default/locale
# File generated by update-locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
I do not observe this, even after “sudo dpkg-reconfigure lo
ut not actually shipped by a package will not be found by these
commands.
You can look in all the maintainer scripts to see where it's
mentioned:
$ grep -r /etc/default/locale /var/lib/dpkg/info
which leads me to believe it may be most relevant to the "locales"
package, but this doe
On 2/13/24 17:48, Nicolas George wrote:
Gremlin (12024-02-13):
Oh like debian does?
cat /etc/default/locale
# File generated by update-locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
I do not observe this, even after “sudo dpkg-reconfigure locales”. Can
you explain how you re
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:48:04PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Gremlin (12024-02-13):
> > Oh like debian does?
> >
> > cat /etc/default/locale
> > # File generated by update-locale
> > LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> > LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
> > LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
>
> I do not observe this, even after “sudo
Gremlin (12024-02-13):
> Oh like debian does?
>
> cat /etc/default/locale
> # File generated by update-locale
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
> LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
I do not observe this, even after “sudo dpkg-reconfigure locales”. Can
you explain how you reached this state?
--
Nicol
1 - 100 of 4693 matches
Mail list logo
