On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 07:16:46AM +0100, andy wrote:
>
> >>My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How
> >>can
> / = 12GB
> SWAP = 2.8GB
> /home = 168GB
>
> No separate /var /tmp, etc.
>
> Having run apt-get clean / is now down to 56%. I suspect that the
> balan
Am 2008-05-23 09:35:51, schrieb Mike Bird:
> I'm pretty sure that du figures out the number of blocks used from
> the file size (although maybe not the indirect blocks):
>
> $ mkdir foo
> $ du foo
> 4 foo
> $ echo small >foo/bar
> $ du foo
> 8 foo
> $
And do not forget that eve
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 05:56:23PM +0100, andy wrote:
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full.
> How can I clean this out without trashing important files? What should
> I be looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed
> safely?
The du utility, as
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:56 PM, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How can
> I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be looking
> for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
El vie, 23-05-2008 a las 09:10 -0700, Steve Lamb escribió:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 4:19 am, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > That, or the marketing department of your hard drive manufacturer
> > confuses binary and base-10 exponential expressions.
>
> They don't. HDs always use base-10, not binary. The
On Fri May 23 2008 07:19:10 Ron Johnson wrote:
> Lastly, remember that df sees blocks, but du sees *files*. So,
> where du sees 3 files that are each 1KiB, fir a total of 3KiB, df
> sees them as each using 1 4KiB block, for a total of 12KiB.
I'm pretty sure that du figures out the number of block
2008/5/23 Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 4:19 am, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> That, or the marketing department of your hard drive manufacturer
>> confuses binary and base-10 exponential expressions.
>
>They don't. HDs always use base-10, not binary. They know it makes the
>
On Fri, May 23, 2008 4:19 am, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> That, or the marketing department of your hard drive manufacturer
> confuses binary and base-10 exponential expressions.
They don't. HDs always use base-10, not binary. They know it makes the
drives look bigger.
--
Steve Lamb
--
To UNSU
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/08 09:08, andy wrote:
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El vie, 23-05-2008 a las 07:16 +0100, andy escribió:
[snip]
As an aside, I seem to be missing approx 18GB of HD space - this is a
200GB
El vie, 23-05-2008 a las 15:08 +0100, andy escribió:
> Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > El vie, 23-05-2008 a las 07:16 +0100, andy escribió:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Hello
> > > > >
> > > > > My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full.
> > > > > How can
> > > > > I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/08 09:08, andy wrote:
> Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
>> El vie, 23-05-2008 a las 07:16 +0100, andy escribió:
>>
>>>
>>>
[snip]
>>>
>>> As an aside, I seem to be missing approx 18GB of HD space - this is a
>>> 200GB HD, but adding the valu
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El vie, 23-05-2008 a las 07:16 +0100, andy escribió:
Hello
My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How can
I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be looking
for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-
2008/5/23 Gabriel Parrondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> As an aside, I seem to be missing approx 18GB of HD space - this is a
>> 200GB HD, but adding the values given above totals 182GB. Strange, and I
>> cannot track it down anywhere, and I don't dual-boot, so unless 200GB
>> was listed on the packagin
El vie, 23-05-2008 a las 07:16 +0100, andy escribió:
>
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How
> >> can
> >> I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be looking
> >> for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixe
2008/5/22 andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello
>
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How can
> I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be looking
> for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andy
>
I would
> andy wrote:
> > My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full.
> > How can I clean this out without trashing important files? What
> > should I be looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be
> > deep-sixed safely?
>
> When I do my yearly spring cleaning, I use deborp
Hello
My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How can
I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be looking
for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
Thanks
Andy
try with this:
# apt-get clean
and then verify the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
andy wrote:
> Hello
>
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How
> can I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be
> looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
>
> Th
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> While that is accurate as far as it goes... How likely is the average
> user to ever need the cached debs?
[ snippage ]
> Realistically, if you're not going to install to additional machines and
> it's been more than a day or two since you installed a package (to
> provid
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:05:42PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> Realistically, if you're not going to install to additional machines and
> it's been more than a day or two since you installed a package (to
> provide time to notice any install/configuration problems), the odds of
On Thu, 22 May 2008 18:05:42 -0500
Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Personally, I've been running Debian continuously for nearly a decade
> (that long already? sheesh...) and I have never had use for a cached
> deb for anything except:
...
> 2) Noticing that I messed up an opti
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:21:15AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:16 am, Sam Leon wrote:
> > andy wrote:
> > Trying running "aptitude clean"
>
> "aptitude autoclean" is a better suggestion. Clean removes all cached
> deb files. Autoclean removes all old cached deb files w
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:56 PM, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How
> can I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be
> looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
On Thu, May 22, 2008 10:16 am, Sam Leon wrote:
> andy wrote:
> Trying running "aptitude clean"
"aptitude autoclean" is a better suggestion. Clean removes all cached
deb files. Autoclean removes all old cached deb files while retaining
the most current cached files in case they're needed. Su
andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97%
> full. How can I clean this out without trashing important files? What
> should I be looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be
> deep-sixed safely?
cd /
du -h -s *
then drill down to the b
On Thu, 22 May 2008, andy wrote:
Hello
My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How can
I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be looking
for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
We'll need to know a little more a
andy wrote:
Hello
My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full.
How can I clean this out without trashing important files? What should
I be looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed
safely?
Thanks
Andy
Run a du -Sx | sort -n | less to see what
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:56 PM, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How can
> I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be looking
> for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
>
andy wrote:
Hello
My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How
can I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be
looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
Thanks
Andy
Trying running "aptitude clean"
Sam
--
andy wrote:
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full.
> How can I clean this out without trashing important files? What
> should I be looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be
> deep-sixed safely?
When I do my yearly spring cleaning, I use deborphan and cruft
On Thu May 22 2008 09:56:23 andy wrote:
> My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How
> can I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be
> looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
I dunno, what have you been download
Hello
My / partition is some 12GB and I see that it is currently 97% full. How
can I clean this out without trashing important files? What should I be
looking for in terms of likely culprits that can be deep-sixed safely?
Thanks
Andy
--
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they
32 matches
Mail list logo
