ut the 2.4 mount
initrd.img as root so meanwhile the changing the root to actuale one it
couldn't write on it. Any tips?
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:29:02PM +0330, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> > I got to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4
> > It is ok but because 2.4 using initrd
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:29:02PM +0330, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> I got to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4
> It is ok but because 2.4 using initrd.img so there is some problems init
> proccess. I tgives some errors about ReadOnly file system and also couldn't
> find mta
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:29:02PM +0330, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> I got to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4
> It is ok but because 2.4 using initrd.img so there is some problems init
> proccess. I tgives some errors about ReadOnly file system and also couldn't
> find mta
I got to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4
It is ok but because 2.4 using initrd.img so there is some problems init
proccess. I tgives some errors about ReadOnly file system and also couldn't
find mtab.
Anybody have information about this matter?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:44:57 -0700
Eric Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a web page that kindof summarizes the differences between 2.2 > > and 2.4 on
>a laptop.
>
> http://www.milagrosoft.com/products/software/debian-woody.html
I will give this a try at the weekend! Thanks very
Keith O'Connell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with my laptop which I would appreciate some guidance with. It is a
>Dell Inspiron 3700 (hardly cutting edge now!)
>
> I installed Woody on it with the default 2.2 kernel and the various packages I want
>and it runs fine. I then use dselect to
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 10:29:34 -0400
Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> > I have a problem with my laptop which I would appreciate some guidance with. It is
>a Dell Inspiron 3700 (hardly cutting edge now!)
> >
> > I installed Woo
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> I have a problem with my laptop which I would appreciate some guidance with. It is a
>Dell Inspiron 3700 (hardly cutting edge now!)
>
> I installed Woody on it with the default 2.2 kernel and the various packages I want
>and it
reason somewhere... now my curiosity is peaked.
- Steve
-Original Message-
From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Stephen Nosal
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
I'm inter
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:10:28PM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> Mike -
>
> so the initrd showed up in the kernel-image package along with instructions.
>
> Perhaps I should try this again and see if I'm missing something. Otherwise,
> I guess I'll just have to compile my own...
Hmm. Looking
PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:11 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:49:09PM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> > so, is it possible that the standard build requires a ra
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:09:51PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:50:39AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > In this case, the difference is whether you're installing a debian
> > kernel-image or compiling your own. The kernel images require an
> > initrd. When you c
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:11 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:49:09PM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> so, is it possible that the standard build requires a ramdisk, but if you
> 'rol
dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
Not sure how to make one. There should be a faq somewhere. What do you
need in it is the real question. Maybe you can steal it from the root
disk from the installation set. I checked the initrd man page and I'm
still wondering how to use it.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:49:09PM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> so, is it possible that the standard build requires a ramdisk, but if you
> 'roll your own' it is not necessary?
>
> If the above is true, and I wish to install the standard build kernel, how
> do I go about putting together this ram
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:50:39AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> In this case, the difference is whether you're installing a debian
> kernel-image or compiling your own. The kernel images require an
> initrd. When you compile your own, it is of course up to you whether
> you use an initrd or no
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:19 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:04:51AM -0500, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> > Interesting. My lilo.conf has no line ab
ional line in lilo? What creates the
'initrd-2.4.4-686' file?
- Steve
-Original Message-
From: Michael P. Soulier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:19 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
On Mon
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:19:05PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:04:51AM -0500, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> > Interesting. My lilo.conf has no line about initrd and dmesg reports
> > nothing on ramdisks for my 2.4.7 system. What type of systems need a
> > ramdisk t
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:04:51AM -0500, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> Interesting. My lilo.conf has no line about initrd and dmesg reports
> nothing on ramdisks for my 2.4.7 system. What type of systems need a
> ramdisk to boot initially?
I understood that all 2.4 kernels do, but I suppose i
Interesting. My lilo.conf has no line about initrd and dmesg reports
nothing on ramdisks for my 2.4.7 system. What type of systems need a
ramdisk to boot initially?
--mike
On 06 Aug 2001 11:51:33 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 08:47:59AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 08:47:59AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:18:49AM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> > Folks -
> >
> > I've been having a terrible time attempting to upgrade my perfectly good
> > potato installation to the new woody
> > distribution including the 2
What does the boot init (read quickly ;>) say when it gets to ide
devices? Perhaps your root disk is now on something else. Especially
if you are using devfs (not sure if it's in the prebuilt 2.4 kernel) it
may have moved to /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2. Try that as a
root parameter w
> Mark -
>
> I've performed the apt-get dist-upgrade without the kernel change. Then,
> rather than compiling the kernel, I'm apt-get install ing the new
> kernel-image. The configuration has been my down fall. It proceeds
normally,
> but then the reboot fails with a kernel panic that it can't find
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:54:18AM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> Mark -
>
> I've performed the apt-get dist-upgrade without the kernel change. Then,
> rather than compiling the kernel, I'm apt-get install ing the new
> kernel-image. The configuration has been my down fall. It proceeds normally,
>
Original Message-
From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Stephen Nosal
Cc: 'Debian "User List (E-mail)'"
Subject: RE: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
What type of controller is the hard drive on at the
bject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:18:49AM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> Folks -
>
> I've been having a terrible time attempting to upgrade my perfectly good
> potato installation to the new woody
> distribution including the 2.4 ker
/dev/hda2. There is no boot prompt to pass the process additional
> parameters.
>
> - Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Heldebrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:34 AM
> To: Debian User List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:18:49AM -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> Folks -
>
> I've been having a terrible time attempting to upgrade my perfectly good
> potato installation to the new woody
> distribution including the 2.4 kernel. Each time I attempt to install the
> kernel, I get a statement regar
brant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Debian User List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: dist upgrade potato to woody 2.2 to 2.4 kernel
What does the error say? Has the new 2.4 kernel been installed and
booted?
--mike
On 06 Aug 2001 10:18:49 -0400, Stephen Nosal
Ooops. Disregard all that stuff on raid. I haven't had enough coffee
yet this morning.
--mike
On 06 Aug 2001 10:18:49 -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> Folks -
>
> I've been having a terrible time attempting to upgrade my perfectly good
> potato installation to the new woody
> distribution includin
What does the error say? Has the new 2.4 kernel been installed and
booted? If so, is raid compiled in or made available as modules?
--mike
On 06 Aug 2001 10:18:49 -0400, Stephen Nosal wrote:
> Folks -
>
> I've been having a terrible time attempting to upgrade my perfectly good
> potato install
Folks -
I've been having a terrible time attempting to upgrade my perfectly good
potato installation to the new woody
distribution including the 2.4 kernel. Each time I attempt to install the
kernel, I get a statement regarding initrd, and the upgrade fails.
I've looked high and low for documenta
> "Herbert" == Herbert Pirke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> As far as I know, some block device names changed with the
Herbert> 2.4 kernel, so I wonder if that changes a lot. Maybe some
Herbert> changed/added simlinks fix the problem.
Normally, you shouldn't need to change anything. The
Hi,
I have a general question about the possibility of
updating from 2.2.18 to a 2.4.x kernel without
reinstalling everything. A lot of things changed in
the new release and I just wanted to know if updating
in this case means a complete new installation or if
it is just another make, dep, clean,
>> After compiling the new kernel, I get the 'uncompresing
>> kernel...OK' text and then nothing happens, the system
>> just hangs and i have to reboot it. any ideas!?
>>
>> My system is a P200 MMX with 128MB RAM. Debian 2.2
>> fully upgraded with a
>
> Do you still have the config file that you u
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 07:23:48PM -0400, Paul Wright wrote:
>
> Yeah, the kernel keeps on growing, it's almost like another OS I'd heard
> of once...
>
Just like pretty much any other software. I challenge you to find 3
programms under active development for over a year that didn't grow.
With
On Thu, 24 May 2001 23:05:52 BST, Patrick wrote:
>
> Changing to testing/unstable did the trick. Its booted.
>
> Actually, this 200MMX with its 128MB RAM and 8 Gig hard drive was my pride
> and joy once upon a time. when I moved it from NT Server to Linux, most
> felt I had passed up on a super
Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: 2.2 to 2.4
| On Thu, 24 May 2001 17:18:30 BST, Patrick wrote:
|
| >
| > After compiling the new kernel, I get the 'uncompresing kernel...OK'
text
| > and then nothing happens,
On Thu, 24 May 2001 17:18:30 BST, Patrick wrote:
>
> After compiling the new kernel, I get the 'uncompresing kernel...OK' text
> and then nothing happens, the system just hangs and i have to reboot it. any
> ideas!?
>
> My system is a P200 MMX with 128MB RAM. Debian 2.2 fully upgraded with a
> s
Do you still have the config file that you used for your 2.2 kernel? If so put
it in the 2.4 source tree named .config and run make oldconfig. That will make
sure that you have all of the same config settings that you had before and
either confirm that is is a configuration problem or prove that
rom: "Hall Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Patrick Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: 2.2 to 2.4
| > After compiling the new kernel, I get the 'uncompresing kernel...
| > OK' text and then nothing happe
> After compiling the new kernel, I get the 'uncompresing kernel...
> OK' text and then nothing happens, the system just hangs and
> i have to reboot it. any ideas!?
>
> My system is a P200 MMX with 128MB RAM. Debian 2.2 fully
> upgraded with a...
Did you change the kernel's processor (CPU) selec
After compiling the new kernel, I get the 'uncompresing kernel...OK' text
and then nothing happens, the system just hangs and i have to reboot it. any
ideas!?
My system is a P200 MMX with 128MB RAM. Debian 2.2 fully upgraded with a
sources.list as follows:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian sta
NewBie Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, I am porting a Network driver from Redhat 6.2 to Debian. And also
>from kernel2.2 to 2.4. Since the GCC is not changed till RH6.2 version,
>I need to change only the kernel 2.2 to 2.4 changes.
>
>I followed the following links
Hi, I am porting a Network driver from Redhat 6.2 to
Debian. And also from kernel2.2 to 2.4. Since the GCC
is not changed till RH6.2 version, I need to change
only the kernel 2.2 to 2.4 changes.
I followed the following links to port kernel2.2 to
kernel2.4. But the driver does not work. Can I
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:04:24 -0600, you wrote:
>
>It tells you exactly which upgrades you need. In my case for a 2.4.1
>kernel I needed -
>modutils 2.4.0
>e2fsprogs 1.19
>on a stock Potato box.
you need to update pppd too
Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chandler.u-net.com
Thanks kent
This Proggie is realy the best i ever saw absolutly great!!!
Thanks alot. That solves also much other problems i have.
cheers,
Raffaele
On Sunday 11 February 2001 17:00, ktb wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:36:29PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Yes, ok, i wil
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:36:29PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, ok, i will forget rpm.
>
> I tried your way over apt-get all worked fine until the compile process
> started. Here is the output of apt-get:
>
>
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> Need to g
Hi
Yes, ok, i will forget rpm.
I tried your way over apt-get all worked fine until the compile process
started. Here is the output of apt-get:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 977kB of source archives.
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is e2fsprogs
dpkg-buildpac
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for that help.
>
> I got the modutils rpm from kernel.org and installed it with no probs.
>
> Now i downloaded the e2fs source files from the depian ftp. I got 3 files.
> The main file, a diff file and a .dsc fil
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 02:21:15PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to the
> 2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i have to look at some special issues or
> can i compile it the same way i did it with the 2.2? Do i need som
Le dim, 11 fév 2001 14:36:24, Sebastiaan a écrit :
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to
> the
> > 2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i have to look at some special
> issues or
> > can i compile it
Hi,
AFAIK, you only need modutils=>2.4. Search the web for it, I do not know
an official .deb package.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to the
> 2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i ha
Hi,
I use the stable (ptotato)-Debian release. Now i wan't to upgrade to the
2.4.1 kernel (from the 2.2.18). Do i have to look at some special issues or
can i compile it the same way i did it with the 2.2? Do i need some special
Progs?
cheers,
Raffaele
--
Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Alec,
Quoth Alec Smith,
> I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
> and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
> basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide which
> describes how to do masquerading and
Hi Alec,
anyway take a look on
http://www.sentry.net/~obsid/IPTables/rc.scripts.dir/current/rc.firewall.iptables
and
http://netfilter.kernelnotes.org/
Seeya
At 20:31 28/01/2001 -0200, you wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:24:25 -0500
Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand a large
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:24:25 -0500
Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
> and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
> basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide w
I understand a large portion of the kernel 2.4 networking code was updated
and/or completely replaced. Under 2.2 I have ipchains configured to do
basic masquerading for my local LAN. Is there a straightforward guide which
describes how to do masquerading and firewalling with 2.4 after moving up
59 matches
Mail list logo
