On Tuesday 06 March 2001 12:25, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:55:57PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Yes, two/three days ago, look in the mailing list of this week
> > > about "trouble compiling gs (ghostscript) from source".
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:55:57PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes, two/three days ago, look in the mailing list of this week about
> > "trouble compiling gs (ghostscript) from source". I've forced the
> > inclusion of the time.h header, and
Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, two/three days ago, look in the mailing list of this week about
> "trouble compiling gs (ghostscript) from source". I've forced the
> inclusion of the time.h header, and a couple of trivial change in
> the stp driver itself about some incorrect
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Matthias Wieser wrote:
>
> When I download something, is the directory that will be created,
> contain already the newest version of the drivers?
>
> Reason behind the question: I try to compile Ghostscript with the stp
> driver of the gimp-print project.
>
> I have not bee
Matthias Wieser wrote:
> When I download something, is the directory that will be created,
> contain already the newest version of the drivers?
>
> Reason behind the question: I try to compile Ghostscript with the stp
> driver of the gimp-print project.
>
> I have not been able to compile the thin
When I download something, is the directory that will be created,
contain already the newest version of the drivers?
Reason behind the question: I try to compile Ghostscript with the stp
driver of the gimp-print project.
I have not been able to compile the things, i downloaded with
apt-get source
6 matches
Mail list logo