also sprach Eric d'Alibut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.17.0500 +0200]:
> I see no one has commented on your example, which I take as proof
> positive that this entire thread belongs in a museum somewhere, perhaps
> next to the 'How many angels can dance on the head of a pin' scholastic
> debates.
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 13:41, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>perl hello.pl
> hello, world!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>cat hello.pl
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> use Inline C => q{
> void hello () {
> printf("hello, world!\n");
> }
> };
> hello();
Programmable script! Um...
Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> begin John S. J. Anderson quotation:
> >
> > I'm confused by the above statement. Canceling out the double
> > negative, I get
> >
> > "that is the definition most people mean when they know enough to
> > call non-scripting 'programming'".
>
>
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or what of this example:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>perl hello.pl
> hello, world!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>cat hello.pl
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> use Inline C => q{
> void hello () {
> printf("hello, world!\n");
> }
> };
> hello();
That
Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See the followup email. It ain't my scheme, and I don't agree with it;
> I was presenting what my experience shows is usually meant by people who
> don't know better than the split "scripting" and "programming".
Ah, I see -- we're mostly agreeing at th
John S. J. Anderson wrote:
> So, where do python and e-lisp fit in your little scheme? (No pun
> intended.) You can compile-n-run, or compile to intermediate
> byte-code, distribute, and run. Or how about BASIC? It comes in both
> interpreted and compiled versions; does the "scripting"
> vs. "progr
On Monday 15 April 2002 21:56, John S. J. Anderson wrote:
> jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > when would you use programming as opposed to scripting?
>
> Well, before I answer that, define, if you would, the difference
> between "programming" and "scripting". (Warning: I don't think there's
> mu
begin John S. J. Anderson quotation:
>
> I'm confused by the above statement. Canceling out the double
> negative, I get
>
> "that is the definition most people mean when they know enough to
> call non-scripting 'programming'".
You cannot cancel two negatives out of sentence by merely ass
begin John S. J. Anderson quotation:
>
> So, where do python and e-lisp fit in your little scheme? (No pun
See the followup email. It ain't my scheme, and I don't agree with it;
I was presenting what my experience shows is usually meant by people who
don't know better than the split "scripting"
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:56:37 -0400, John S. J. Anderson wrote:
>jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> when would you use programming as opposed to scripting?
>
>Well, before I answer that, define, if you would, the difference
>between "programming" and "scripting". (Warning: I don't think there's
On 0, "John S. J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > begin Shawn McMahon quotation:
> > >
> > > The compliation step is seperate from the execution step, from the
> > > perspective of the user.
> >
> > I should add "that is the definition mos
On 2002.04.16 02:21 John S. J. Anderson wrote:
Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> begin Shawn McMahon quotation:
> >
> > The compliation step is seperate from the execution step, from the
> > perspective of the user.
>
> I should add "that is the definition most people mean when they d
Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> begin Shawn McMahon quotation:
> >
> > The compliation step is seperate from the execution step, from the
> > perspective of the user.
>
> I should add "that is the definition most people mean when they don't
> know enough not to call non-scripting 'p
Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> begin John S. J. Anderson quotation:
> >
> > Well, before I answer that, define, if you would, the difference
> > between "programming" and "scripting". (Warning: I don't think there's
> > much of one, if any.)
> The compliation step is seperate from
begin Shawn McMahon quotation:
>
> The compliation step is seperate from the execution step, from the
> perspective of the user.
I should add "that is the definition most people mean when they don't
know enough not to call non-scripting 'programming'".
--
Shawn McMahon| Mc
begin John S. J. Anderson quotation:
>
> Well, before I answer that, define, if you would, the difference
> between "programming" and "scripting". (Warning: I don't think there's
> much of one, if any.)
The compliation step is seperate from the execution step, from the
perspective of the user.
jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> when would you use programming as opposed to scripting?
Well, before I answer that, define, if you would, the difference
between "programming" and "scripting". (Warning: I don't think there's
much of one, if any.)
In my mind, your earlier question was a "progr
17 matches
Mail list logo
