On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:17:43 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 16:38:31 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:45:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
>> >
>> > Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
>>
>> And wrong
On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 16:38:31 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:45:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
> >
> > Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
>
> And wrong spelling.
Mails pointing out speling mistaikes and misdirect
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:45:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
>
> Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
And wrong spelling.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.or
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:59:14 -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2011 07:27:09 am Camaleón wrote:
>> Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
>>
>> - They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers
>> :-?) - They're text based
>> - They have no e-mail foote
On Friday 02 September 2011 07:27:09 am Camaleón wrote:
> Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
>
> - They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers :-?)
> - They're text based
> - They have no e-mail footer
>
> Having a mbox archive would help to diagnose such cases :-
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:04:13 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2011 12:27:09 Camaleón wrote:
>> Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
>>
>> - They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers
>> :-?) - They're text based
>> - They have no e-mail footer
>
> That
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:39:11 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 02/09/11 12:27, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:23:03 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>>> Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the
footer appended at their messages but subscrib
On Friday 02 September 2011 12:27:09 Camaleón wrote:
> Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
>
> - They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers :-?)
> - They're text based
> - They have no e-mail footer
That is just a quirk of Gmane. My own postings arrive in my inb
E_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from )
id 1Qz9Fw-0005T8-BJ
for debian-user@lists.debian.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:32:40 +
From: Lisi
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: unsuscribe
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:32:37 +0100
User-Agen
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:23:03 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
>> appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not
>> a scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded by observing the
>>
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:01:51 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> This one didn't (here).
>>
>> Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
>> seems quite random to me.
>
> That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not adde
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:46:41 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> FWIW, I don't receive list emails (since I opted out), and neither do I
> post directly. I both read and post via gmane; I find that far more
> convenient.
Me neither (I don't "receive" mailing list e-mails), I'm also a Pan
user ;-)
Gree
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 03:01:51PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >This one didn't (here).
> >
> >Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added?
> >It seems quite random to me.
>
> That message was GPG-signed, the footer is no
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 08:44:13AM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 02/09/11 07:29, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:01:51PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >>On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
> >>>Every e-mail I've gotten so far, has had the foot on it... So I think
>
On 02/09/11 07:29, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:01:51PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
Every e-mail I've gotten so far, has had the foot on it... So I think
it's safe to say, always does apply in my case.
... but this one didn't here
Camaleón wrote:
> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
> appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
> scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded by observing the
> messages that reach the list.
Simple plain text messages
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI writes:
> On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> This one didn't (here).
>> Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
>> seems quite random to me.
> That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
> br
On 02/09/11 01:01, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camale�n wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100 "Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com"
suggested this:
>Sorry to kybosh your theory, Camaleón, but I am subscribed and I
>usually (I would have said always, but I just checked) get the
>footers. :-)
As do I
Charlie
--
Registered Linux User:- 329524
**
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:01:51 -0300
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Hello Eduardo,
> That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
> break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another part of the
> multi-part message, but I could only see that by looking at the
> me
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:01:51 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
> break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another part of the
> multi-part message, but I could only see that by looking at the message
> source.)
>
> I
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:39:17 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 18:08:06 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> it would be great if Debian users list would switch to mailman.
>
> Why? What's wrong with it as it is? I like it.
+1. Using Pan and posting via gmane works for me. Plus I can killfi
On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
This one didn't (here).
Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
seems quite random to me.
That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another
On 01/09/11 13:30, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:53:17 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
Okay, but not all of the messages I receive from this list append the
footer... or maybe is just me? :-?
Not just you. However, the vast majority of messages *do* contain the
foote
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:21:10 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
>>> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
>>> appended at their messages but subscribed users do not.
On Thursday 01 September 2011 18:08:06 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> it would be great if Debian users list
> would switch to mailman.
Why? What's wrong with it as it is? I like it.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 16:30 +,
debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
[snip]
Didn't read the whole thread, but it would be great if Debian users list
would switch to mailman.
0,02€
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:53:17 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
> Okay, but not all of the messages I receive from this list append the
> footer... or maybe is just me? :-?
Not just you. However, the vast majority of messages *do* contain the
footer.
--
Regards _
/ )
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:21:10 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
> While my messages are always "fted" :-)
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/416330/focus=416354
Ooops, this is the correct link:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Lisi [mailto:lisi.re...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 16:51
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: [OT] Re: unsuscribe
>
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
> > My gu
On Thursday 01 September 2011 16:21:10 Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
> >> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
> >> appended at their messages but subscribed users do not
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
>> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
>> appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not
>> a scientific statement, just a wild theor
On Thursday 01 September 2011 16:01:51 Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
> >> On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
> >>> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
> >>> appended at
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
scientific statement,
On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
>> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
>> appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
>> scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded b
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
> My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
> appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
> scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded by observing the
> messages that reach t
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:10:10 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 01/09/11 12:53, Camaleón wrote:
>>> If the OP is incapable of reading the footer on every post to the
>>> list, what makes you think (s)he is able to read your instructions?
>>> ;-)
>>
>> I'd say he is "he" ("Esteban" looks like a
On 01/09/11 12:53, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:04:35 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 11:51, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:30:37 -0600, Esteban Monge wrote:
Nice try... but not that way :-)
If the OP is incapable of reading the footer on every post to the list
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:04:35 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 01/09/11 11:51, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:30:37 -0600, Esteban Monge wrote:
>>
>> Nice try... but not that way :-)
>>
> If the OP is incapable of reading the footer on every post to the list,
> what makes you think (
40 matches
Mail list logo
