Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-25 Thread csj
On November 20, 2003 at 8:50PM -0800, "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Se

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-25 Thread csj
On November 21, 2003 at 7:27PM +0800, "David Palmer." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:24:16 + > ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 > > "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-21 Thread David Palmer.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:24:16 + ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 > "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > > csj <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-21 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:24:16AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 "Karsten M. Self" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > yeah, i was one of those to whose addresses you felt yours

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-21 Thread ben
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Sel

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-20 Thread Karsten M. Self
Mr. Folkert has a grudge against me from another forum in which a rather flagrently explosive fest of fabrication of history and rules, failure to stand by prior statements, gross personal abuse, spinelessness in standing up for justice (with few exceptions), and violation of personal confidences,

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-20 Thread Greg Folkert
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 23:50, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > > > on Tu

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-20 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread csj
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 04:49:14 +, ben wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread ben
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > [..

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread csj
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:27:44 -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > csj([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread Wayne Topa
csj([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > >

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread csj
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > As several (in or out of the) closet anarchists have replied > > > th

*plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > [...] > > > As several (in or out of the) closet anarchists have replied > > that self-control is apparently beyond their mein, I'll remind > > them that con