in the munging-headers thread, someone posted a link to
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/listreplyto.txt - which includes this:
> - "Reply-To munging adds additional functionality, it actually increases
> freedom of choice"
> *cough* bullshit *cough*
> For one, it prevents a thread across two l
> See above reference to proper usage of the 'find' command. It really
> comes in handy in situations like this. :) <- Once again. Smiley. Joke.
> Ha ha. Funny. Etc, etc, etc, ad nauseaum. Need I go on? :)
has it not occurred to you that what you find funny, others might find
offensive, irritatin
hi all
apologies if this is an absolutely inane question: when i execute a
command (e.g. after pressing alt + F2) and elect to 'run in terminal',
it always chooses to use uxterm. is there any way of telling my box to
use Konsole instead, which (a) looks much nicer and (b) makes copying
and pasting
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 18:16, Rohit Kumar Mehta wrote:
> Hey I know this doesn't help you at all, but how did you get evolution
> working with Debian?
> I thought Ximian stopped supporting Debian :(
> I would like to try Ximian Desktop with Evolution.
no idea about Ximian Desktop, but Evolution w
Hi all,
i'm not sure if this is the best place to ask about such things, but
could anyone tell me, or direct me to a place where i can find out
- how to tell firebird to use evolution to handle mailto: links
and
- how to tell evolution to use firebird to open webpages?
at the moment, evolution
> Not meaning to be a prude, but see:
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct, next to last rule.
could you please quote webpages for those who have difficulty accessing
webpages from email? (the sysadmins have disabled the URL-viewer in Pine
when run on my email-server, for example.
> Your must have set your partitions up as logical partitions. Logical
> partitions start at 5.
how wonderfully, err, logical
j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
all sorted out: thanks to all for your help. nice shiny box, working as
new - and i no longer have to use pine to get at my email!
for some reason, my partitions are hda5 through 8 - i have no idea quite
how or why i set them up like that, but once i'd found that out, it was
all ok.
oh, and using
thanks for all the advice: still no joy as yet, though
when i boot from the CD, it gives me about 5 options, most of which
involve a new installation. there is, however, the option of executing a
shell command.
when i do that, it tells me i'm about to run ash (whatever that might be)
and that the
> Maybe you have one of the woody intaller CD's, boot off the first one,
> and when prompted type rescue root=/dev/hdxX <-- replace with your
> root partition, probably hda1.
thanks: how do i know which is my root partition? (i can't remember which
is which of my various partitions - i can't r
a problem:
i updated my sources.list file, and ran apt-get dist-upgrade. followed the
instructions on the screen. and rebooted.
except now my box won't boot. i just get the characters LI (i think) in
the top left-hand corner of teh screen, and nothing happens.
what should i do?
josh
--
To UN
> I don't believe any of this is true. I can see no Reply-to: header in
> what I get from the list. Running mutt, "r" replies to sender. "L"
> does a list reply.
apologies - i get the digest which -does- munge reply-to headers to send
to the list. i'll be interested to have a look on firebird
> Hey, you're right.
> "Reply all" puts the list as CC, individual as "To" --- however, the
> `simple' "Reply" puts *only* the list as recipient. This mail, for
> instance, was sent with "Reply", and at least I believe it's sent only
> to the list, and not you as an individual (as well).
that's
> Question: The only reason why I stay with evolution instead of changing
> to thunderbird is: There is no "Reply to list"-button. I can't live
> without it. Did I miss something, or do you have to correct every mail
> to a list manually?
> In mailinglists I only accept answering to the list (pub
i'm running Evolution 1.45 on KDE 3.1.4, with a recent (i think: i
downloaded it a couple of weeks ago) version of GnuPG. although i have
no problem signing messages, whenever i click on anyone else's
signature, i get the following error message :
> This message is digitally signed but can
tead.
which seems, from the penultimate line, to be a self-perpetuating
situation.
could anyone please explain what's going on and how i can fix it?!
thanks,
josh robinson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
16 matches
Mail list logo
