Hi,
Albretch Mueller wrote:
> But how do you strace a program saving the output (of the stracing)
> in a logfile while you also save that program's output without making
> it part of the stracing?
man strace says:
-o filename Write the trace output to the file filename rather
t
On 12/25/23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> If you want to see what a process is doing, there's strace. It can
> even be told to follow all the children of a process (strace -f).
But how do you strace a program saving the output (of the stracing)
in a logfile while you also save that program's output w
On 26/12/23 10:05, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I don't know why Z was used instead of UTC or GMT. Probably to save
space, and save some ink if a schedule was printed.
ZULU time is military, primarily NATO. The world is divided up into
alphabetic time zones using the NATO phonetic alphabet with a f
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:36:44PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I copied the file to another computer in the LAN, ran LaTeX and dvips,
and sent it to the same printer, but the file hung at the same spot.
Any chance you can use `pdflatex` instead of `latex + dvips`?
Have you tried to manually c
Jeff writes:
> I don't know why Z was used instead of UTC or GMT.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time#Time_zones
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:36:44PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I copied the file to another computer in the LAN, ran LaTeX and dvips,
and sent it to the same printer, but the file hung at the same spot.
Any chance you can use `pdflatex` instead of `latex + dvips`?
Have you tried to manually c
> I copied the file to another computer in the LAN, ran LaTeX and dvips,
> and sent it to the same printer, but the file hung at the same spot.
Any chance you can use `pdflatex` instead of `latex + dvips`?
Have you tried to manually convert the PS to PDF before sending to
the printer? or to conve
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 8:43 PM Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
> On Mon Dec 25 12:01:59 2023 "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
> > Yes - that's the obvious way. I set my machines to /etc/UTC (or
> > /etc/GMT) and leave them there. No daylight saving time, no offsets -
> > all logs unambiguous. That's why (
On a desktop debian 12.2 amd64 system with
HP_LaserJet_P3010_Series_48E436 (ethernet), LaTeX documents composed
with Emacs frequently print only up to a certain point (it varies with
the document), and CUPS prints the error message:
ERROR: typecheck OFFENDING COMMAND: known
xdvi displays the d
On Mon Dec 25 12:01:59 2023 "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> Yes - that's the obvious way. I set my machines to /etc/UTC (or
> /etc/GMT) and leave them there. No daylight saving time, no offsets -
> all logs unambiguous. That's why (worldwide) radio logkeeping is/was
> in UTC. If you're travelling i
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 12:35:37PM -0600, Mike McClain wrote:
> root@RPI4b3:~> tty; echo $SHELL; echo "' " | hd
For the record, $SHELL does not tell you what shell you're currently in.
It tells you which login shell your account uses, or which shell
you'd *like* to use when you launch a new xterm
root@RPI4b3:~> tty; echo $SHELL; echo "' " | hd
/dev/tty1
/bin/bash
27 20 0a |' .|
0003
mike@RPI4b3:~> tty; echo $SHELL; echo "' " | hd
/dev/tty6
/bin/bash
27 20 0a |' .|
0003
mike@RPI4b3
As Andrew did, I also CC'd.. :)
On 12/25/23, 이 강우 wrote:
> how to clone apt repository to newest only?
> Fedora/Red Hat will organize the repository by copying only the most recent
> packages from that distribution if you give it the "reposync --newest-only"
> option, but Debian doesn't seem to
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 03:35:04PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 12/21/23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > So... this is interesting. Apparently timedatectl doesn't simply look
> > at the target of /etc/localtime. There's a DELAY before the value is
> > correctly reported. This tells me that tim
On 12/21/23, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> So... this is interesting. Apparently timedatectl doesn't simply look
> at the target of /etc/localtime. There's a DELAY before the value is
> correctly reported. This tells me that timedatectl is in communication
> with some process (perhaps PID 1, I don't k
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 11:31:09PM -0600, Mike McClain wrote:
> I've examined /etc/inputrc, .inputrc, /etc/bash.bashrc, ~/.bashrc,
> /etc/profile, /etc/profile.d/*, ~/.profile, ~/.bash_profile,
OK, you've examined them... and... what did you *see* in them?
When did this problem start to happen, a
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 12:21:29PM +, �� wrote:
[Copied to the poster because they may not be subscribed]
> how to clone apt repository to newest only?
> Fedora/Red Hat will organize the repository by copying only the most recent
> packages from that distribution if you give it the "repo
how to clone apt repository to newest only?
Fedora/Red Hat will organize the repository by copying only the most recent
packages from that distribution if you give it the "reposync --newest-only"
option, but Debian doesn't seem to be able to do that.
What can I do?
Hi,
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> [...] (it's actually a logistic function [1]).
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_function
> Looking forward to Yet Another Of Those Nerdy Monster Threads ;-)
Since it's happening periodically with about the same participants,
shouldn't we rather try to mod
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 25.12.2023 um 08:56:41 Uhr schrieb Brad Rogers:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:50:13 +1100
> > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >
> > Hello Zenaan,
> >
> > >OMG money! I, being Debian User it
> >
> > The best thing to do is ignore SPAM.
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 25.12.2023 um 08:56:41 Uhr schrieb Brad Rogers:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:50:13 +1100
> > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >
> > Hello Zenaan,
> >
> > >OMG money! I, being Debian User it
> >
> > The best thing to do is ignore SPAM.
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 12:24:55AM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 12/25/23, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 24 Dec 2023 at 23:05:53 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> >> On 12/18/23, Max Nikulin wrote:
> ...
> >> Why would %S be in the range
> >> second (00..60), instead of (00..59)?:
> >
> >
Am 25.12.2023 um 08:56:41 Uhr schrieb Brad Rogers:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:50:13 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Hello Zenaan,
>
> >OMG money! I, being Debian User it
>
> The best thing to do is ignore SPAM.
>
> If you *must* reply, don't quote the whole thing and send it to the
> list
On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 16:50:13 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Hello Zenaan,
>OMG money! I, being Debian User it
The best thing to do is ignore SPAM.
If you *must* reply, don't quote the whole thing and send it to the list
*again*.
Thank you.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}
On Sun, 2023-12-24 at 23:05 +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
[...]
> Why would %S be in the range second (00..60), instead of (00..59)?:
To support leap seconds [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
--
Tixy
25 matches
Mail list logo
