Is there any open source AI speech synthesis package that can be run on
a Debian workstation or server?
That is a package that has a large modern set of training data and that
can be used to 'clone' a new voice from a relatively small sample.
Secondarily that it has a workable near real time t
On 2023-03-22 10:06, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 22/3/23 09:12, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
Hello,
In my shell script, how to get the localhost's IPs (eth0 and eth1)
correctly?
I know I can run 'ifconfig' and grep etc, but it's maybe not that
graceful.
On Debian the preferred command is
root@debia
On 22/3/23 09:12, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
Hello,
In my shell script, how to get the localhost's IPs (eth0 and eth1)
correctly?
I know I can run 'ifconfig' and grep etc, but it's maybe not that
graceful.
On Debian the preferred command is
root@debian12:~# ip a
1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueu
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:12:19AM +0800, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
> In my shell script, how to get the localhost's IPs (eth0 and eth1)
> correctly?
> I know I can run 'ifconfig' and grep etc, but it's maybe not that graceful.
https://mywiki.wooledge.org/IpAddress
Hello,
In my shell script, how to get the localhost's IPs (eth0 and eth1)
correctly?
I know I can run 'ifconfig' and grep etc, but it's maybe not that
graceful.
Thanks
Corey
On Mon 20 Mar 2023 at 07:36:41 (+0800), Jeremy Ardley wrote:
> On 20/3/23 02:48, David Wright wrote:
> > > Checking the RFC. To my reading the final stanza is not checked
> > > " The is compared to the given network. If CIDR prefix length
> > >
> > > high-order bits match, the mechanism match
On 22/3/23 06:27, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Interesting.
I can't remember ever seeing 192.168.1.1/32 used. In my my part of the
world, it's only meaningful as a degenerate form: all the syntaxes I've
seen which accept the IP/NN notation also accept just IP to mean IP/32,
so writing IP/32 is just
debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org writes:
>
> From: Anssi Saari
> Subject: Re: Bookworm system randomly not responding (was Re: Bookworm system
> not responding on high memory usage)
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:24:37 +0200
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 0
> me second. 192.168.1.1/24 just makes me confused with 192.168.1.1/32
> which is a real host address.
Interesting.
I can't remember ever seeing 192.168.1.1/32 used. In my my part of the
world, it's only meaningful as a degenerate form: all the syntaxes I've
seen which accept the IP/NN notation a
>>> Is there any good low-hassle freedom-respecting reasonable price
>>> reasonable performance computer platform for running Debian these
>> Define your notion of "reasonable" for price and for performance.
> Performance-wise, for the laptop, I'd like aptitude not to compute
> (search for a depend
piorunz writes:
> On 19/03/2023 11:01, b...@iinet.net.au wrote:
>
>> Please accept my sincerest apologies ... I have been offline/out of
>> range for the last 19 weeks and have only just now read your response.
>>
>> Your information and advice is most helpful and deeply appreciated.
>>
>> Many t
* 2023-03-21 00:02:10+0100, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote:
> Is there any good low-hassle freedom-respecting reasonable price
> reasonable performance computer platform for running Debian these
> days?
Maybe from Tuxedo: https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en/why-TUXEDO.tuxedo
(I don't own Tuxedo compute
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:33:26PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Is there any good low-hassle freedom-respecting reasonable price
>> reasonable performance computer platform for running Debian these
> Define your notion of "reasonable" for price and for performance.
Performance-wise, for the la
13 matches
Mail list logo
