Solution to the DRM popup at the bottom of this thread:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1121195
--
Carl Fink c...@finknetwork.com
Thinking and logic and stuff at Reasonably Literate
http://reasonablyliterate.com
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:05:57 +0200
"Michelle Konzack" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 2018-12-19 hackte Patrick Bartek in die Tasten:
> > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:17:53 +0200
> > "Michelle Konzack" wrote:
> >
> >> You have not even tried v61 or higher (v64 now).
> >>
> >> I have deactivated autoupdate but
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 12:54:22 -0500
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > That's a notification from Firefox that you're accessing a site that
> > requires DRM. Since you have DRM turned off, you're going to get this
> > notification. You could disable ALL notifications. Or don't access
> > sites that requir
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have no .mozilla file.
> But the Diskspace is realy 26 GByte.
it is not a file - it is directory and how do you know it is 26GB - where do
you look at?
Strange what you are saying
regards
Hi,
Am 2018-12-19 hackte deloptes in die Tasten:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
>> Also my ThinkPad T400 has 4GByte of memory and 4GByte of Swap and
>> Firefox eat it in less the 24 hours by kicking other Applications.
>>
>> Also there is NO POSSIBILITY to limit th wbcache size...
>> Firefox 64 is ea
Hi,
Am 2018-12-19 hackte Patrick Bartek in die Tasten:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:17:53 +0200
> "Michelle Konzack" wrote:
>
>> You have not even tried v61 or higher (v64 now).
>>
>> I have deactivated autoupdate but it simply ignore it since v54.
>>
>> Also it try to enforce to activated DRM conten
Adding the diffie-hellman line to the config worked, but then the
router complained that there wasn't a matching cipher.
I suspected that if I fixed that, the router'd complain about
something else, so I gave up and fixed things by copying the working
/etc/ssh config dir from the laptop to the oth
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 02:48:17PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> I assume that for two numbers in the second list to be selected, both
> have to match the two members of an individual tuple. As the tuples
> are ordered, I would assume that they are to be tested in the order
> supplied.
>
> As dicti
On Wed 19 Dec 2018 at 16:53:44 (+), Andy Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:23:59AM +, mick crane wrote:
> > just to be a bit clearer.
> > given a list A of *unique* numbers
> > and a list B of possible pairings find which pairs you can make from the
> > list A.
> > 6 can pair with 1
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Also my ThinkPad T400 has 4GByte of memory and 4GByte of Swap and
> Firefox eat it in less the 24 hours by kicking other Applications.
>
> Also there is NO POSSIBILITY to limit th wbcache size...
> Firefox 64 is eating currently 26GByte of my diskspace!
I think you've b
Andy Smith wrote:
> You saying, "a list B of possible pairings find which pairs you can
> make from the list A" doesn't help when B is actually a hash,
> because hashes have keys and values, so we don't know if you mean to
> "make pairings" with the key or the value, nor is it entirely clear
> wha
> That's a notification from Firefox that you're accessing a site that
> requires DRM. Since you have DRM turned off, you're going to get this
> notification. You could disable ALL notifications. Or don't access
> sites that require DRM.
It's too easy to click it by mistake.
I want to turn off n
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:17:53 +0200
"Michelle Konzack" wrote:
> You have not even tried v61 or higher (v64 now).
>
> I have deactivated autoupdate but it simply ignore it since v54.
>
> Also it try to enforce to activated DRM content and whenever a
> website has this crap, I bet a yellow 100px h
Hi Mick,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:23:59AM +, mick crane wrote:
> just to be a bit clearer.
> given a list A of *unique* numbers
> and a list B of possible pairings find which pairs you can make from the
> list A.
> 6 can pair with 100 and 15 can pair with 100 but they cannot both be
> in the
On 2018-12-19 09:12, mick crane wrote:
On 2018-12-19 08:34, deloptes wrote:
mick crane wrote:
yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
I still try to figure out what goes on with the hash pairs
with a longer list of numbers your example seems to pick up on the
values somehow.
I
You have not even tried v61 or higher (v64 now).
I have deactivated autoupdate but it simply ignore it since v54.
Also it try to enforce to activated DRM content and whenever a
website has this crap, I bet a yellow 100px high bar on the top
with the question if I want to activate it.
There is NO
On 2018-12-19 08:34, deloptes wrote:
mick crane wrote:
yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
I still try to figure out what goes on with the hash pairs
with a longer list of numbers your example seems to pick up on the
values somehow.
I dunno, unless there is something about
mick crane wrote:
> yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
> I still try to figure out what goes on with the hash pairs
> with a longer list of numbers your example seems to pick up on the
> values somehow.
> I dunno, unless there is something about using $_ in a loop being
> unr
On 2018-12-19 07:17, deloptes wrote:
mick crane wrote:
except there is only one 100 in @array it gets me along.
thanks and David too.
but this one 100 satisfies both 6 and 15 so 6 and 15 match.
regards
yes but there is only one 100, only one key can have it.
I still try to figure out what
19 matches
Mail list logo
