Hi.
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:04:37PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
> i'm new to debian. yesterday i did install debian on chromebook. i get
> some error when i start lxde. attached file with error [1]. how can i
> resolve it?
>
> [1]
> https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/stuff/raw/master
thanks for feedback, Dan^^
On 2018년 08월 03일 00:39, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:04:37PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
i'm new to debian. yesterday i did install debian on chromebook. i get
some error when i start lxde. attached file with error [1]. how can i
resolve it?
On 2018-08-01 13:41:32 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > That
> [the 4.0.1 source code can build both versions under discussion]
> > > seems unlikely to me. I'm not going to bother to download the
> > > source to find out, but I suspect that the 4 in Packages's "Source:
> > > mpfr4" line is spurious
On 2018-07-31 10:01:00 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > As for the "6", I'm guessing that they chose that because the library
> > version (yes, another versioning sequence) is 6.0.1 as opposed to 4.1.5.
>
> That's right, this is an "API version", so I guess it means that the
> 4.0.1 upstream code
On 2018-07-31 00:37:38 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> I just noticed that there are two packages for libmpfr:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libmpfr4
>
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libmpfr6
>
>
> Funny thing is, this is what the versioning says on those pages:
> Package: libmpfr4 (3
Hello world,
As the Apache MPM (Multi-Processing Module) prefork no longer supports HTTP/2
and having updated to 9.5 (breaking my fully working HTTP/2 server), i wonder
what are the plan for HTTP/2 support.
Is it better to wait for a fix ?
If so, when ?
Is it better to forget MPM, witch i
Good catch. It seems that sometime after I wrote this email a new signature was
generated that is no longer generating errors so I guess it was a temporary
issue.
-T
> On Aug 2, 2018, at 7:28 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
> ADD6B7E2 is an encryption subkey. As this is not used, it was revoke
Todd Fleisher writes:
> I’m seeing this as well and suspect it is due to the GPG sub-key
> ADD6B7E2 having been revoked. I am not sure why this has been done,
> perhaps ftpmaster can provide some context?
ADD6B7E2 is an encryption subkey. As this is not used, it was revoked
later (in 2014).
New
Hi,
On Aug/01/2018, David Christensen wrote:
> On 08/01/2018 03:47 PM, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
> > The question is:
> > "Please unlock disk m2_root_crypt:"
> >
> > I expcted to write the password three times.
>
> Given your crypttab, above, I agree that you should have to enter three
> pa
On 08/02/2018 02:14 PM, der.hans wrote:
Am 02. Aug, 2018 schwätzte Richard Owlett so:
At the end you say this is for WordPress, that pre-answers some of the
questions I was going to bring up :).
And the questions were?
It allow me to get a handle on where my assumptions differ from the rest
o
Hi Christoph,
I’m seeing this as well and suspect it is due to the GPG sub-key ADD6B7E2
having been revoked. I am not sure why this has been done, perhaps ftpmaster
can provide some context?
-T
On Thu 02 Aug 2018 at 08:03:32 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> For the first time I did a system upgrade against the online repository.
> In the past, due to local conditions, my upgrades were by doing a fresh
> install from purchased DVD sets of latest point release.
You have now moved into an a
Am 02. Aug, 2018 schwätzte Richard Owlett so:
At the end you say this is for WordPress, that pre-answers some of the
questions I was going to bring up :).
Unless you have specialized needs it doesn't matter which of the MySQL
forks you use. WordPress only uses general MySQL functionality, so use
I did finally get the 4.17.11 kernel to compile so that my large drives
are visible now, but I had to use a 'shotgun' approach in including as
many SCSI/SATA/etc variables as possible.
I do intend on comparing the non-functioning config for 4.17.11 against
both the functioning config, as well
On 08/02/2018 11:21 AM, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:01 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
I went to the MariaDB homepage and followed links to
[https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/installing-mariadb-deb-files/].
You should instead be installing it from the usual debian-hosted
repo
On 08/02/2018 10:08 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 09:10:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/02/2018 08:27 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
It was pointed out that MySql would be more suitable.
I don't understand this
On 08/02/2018 10:23 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 02 Aug 2018 at 08:03:32 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
For the first time I did a system upgrade against the online repository.
In the past, due to local conditions, my upgrades were by doing a
fresh install from purchased DVD sets of latest po
On 08/02/2018 10:24 AM, bw wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Richard Owlett wrote:
For the first time I did a system upgrade against the online repository.
In the past, due to local conditions, my upgrades were by doing a fresh
install from purchased DVD sets of latest point release.
I was greeted
On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 23:37:33 (-0600), Taren wrote:
> I'm running Stretch, with kernel 4.9.0.7, and am trying to compile a
> new kernel (preferably 4.17.11) into which I can boot.
> The kernel builds successfully, but whenever I try booting into the
> new kernel, I end up in emergency mode, with t
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:01 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I went to the MariaDB homepage and followed links to
> [https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/installing-mariadb-deb-files/].
You should instead be installing it from the usual debian-hosted
repositories, unless you have a known need for a spe
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:04:37PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
> i'm new to debian. yesterday i did install debian on chromebook. i get
> some error when i start lxde. attached file with error [1]. how can i
> resolve it?
>
> $ lsb_release -d
> Description:Debian GNU/Linux 8.11 (jessi
On Thu 02 Aug 2018 at 08:03:32 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> For the first time I did a system upgrade against the online repository.
> In the past, due to local conditions, my upgrades were by doing a
> fresh install from purchased DVD sets of latest point release.
>
> I was greeted by list o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 09:10:12AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 08/02/2018 08:27 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> >>It was pointed out that MySql would be more suitable.
> >
> >I don't understand this statement...
>
> Nor did I :/
> During m
On 08/02/2018 09:10 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/02/2018 08:27 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:20:08AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Some time ago failed to install MariaDB. I hadn't realized it was
tightly aimed at being o
Hi Andy,
Am 02.08.2018 um 13:01 schrieb Andy Smith:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Martin Drescher wrote:
[...]
>> 4.9. It is not a real problem, that Debian is running well.
>
> It is likely that the kernel's idea of what is a "runnable" process
> has changed since t
On 08/02/2018 08:27 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:20:08AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Some time ago failed to install MariaDB. I hadn't realized it was
tightly aimed at being on a network server.
The MariaDB server *is* c
i'm new to debian. yesterday i did install debian on chromebook. i get
some error when i start lxde. attached file with error [1]. how can i
resolve it?
$ lsb_release -d
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 8.11 (jessie)
$ uname -a
Linux localhost 3.18.0-14597-g61c88fee5b70 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jul 13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:20:08AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Some time ago failed to install MariaDB. I hadn't realized it was
> tightly aimed at being on a network server.
The MariaDB server *is* conceptually a network server, as is the
MySQL se
Some time ago failed to install MariaDB. I hadn't realized it was
tightly aimed at being on a network server. It was pointed out that
MySql would be more suitable. I attempted to install it. It failed due
to reasons I don't recall. I suspect that part of the problem was I was
attempting to foll
For the first time I did a system upgrade against the online repository.
In the past, due to local conditions, my upgrades were by doing a fresh
install from purchased DVD sets of latest point release.
I was greeted by list of locales to added or upgraded. Not seeing any
possible harm I allow
Correction:
The kernel version I'm using (which sees my 2.7T drives) is 4.9.0-7-amd,
not 4.9.0.7.
I can provide the .config file for 4.17.11, if needed.
On 08/01/2018 11:37 PM, Taren wrote:
I'm running Stretch, with kernel 4.9.0.7, and am trying to compile a
new kernel (preferably 4.17.11)
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Martin Drescher wrote:
> I'm running a bunch of HTTP servers, most of them running a RHEL
> 6, which is a kernel version 2.6. All patches applied, so that
> Meltdown and Spectre stuff should be included. Some of the servers
> where migrated to a
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> There is no error at all in any way shape or form that I am given
> indicating that there is a key range overflow.
Because you're either (a) not running the 'ssh' command with enough
verbosity to get the full error text, OR (b) your choice of tool simply
does not have the
>
> 2018/08/02 10:05:13 [alert] 20356#20356: *17425 open socket #20 left
> in connection 112
> 2018/08/02 10:05:13 [alert] 20355#20355: *17285 open socket #94 left
> in connection 87
> 2018/08/02 10:05:13 [alert] 20356#20356: *17427 open socket #25 left
> in connection 113
Other problem:
[3744409
Hello
I am using debian 9.4. I am using Nginx 1.10 and Php7.2. I'm getting
mistakes like the following.
2018/08/02 10:05:13 [alert] 20356#20356: *17425 open socket #20 left
in connection 112
2018/08/02 10:05:13 [alert] 20355#20355: *17285 open socket #94 left
in connection 87
2018/08/02 10:05:13
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 02:50:14PM -0700, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What I really want is for this to work (it works without the --source-dir):
>
> mkdir packages && multistrap -f /usr/share/multistrap/stretch.conf -d
> ./chroot --source-dir ./packages > multistrap_log.txt 2>&1
>
> However
On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 13:32 +1200, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 02/08/18 13:05, Default User wrote:
> > So, if apt-get is for non-trivial upgrades, then why not for daily
> > use?
In my experience, major upgrades using aptitude sometimes get seriously
bogged down resolving dependencies, whereas
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 21:05:48 -0400
Default User wrote:
> Deep thoughts:
>
> Debian docs seem to say that apt-get is best for significant upgrades.
>
> Why?
Because it handles large numbers of simultaneous package upgrades
better.
>
> But that aptitude is best for daily package management.
>
Hi,
On Aug/02/2018, Matthew Crews wrote:
> On 8/1/18 3:47 PM, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Debian Stretch and recently I added a new cyphered partition.
> > All works well but I don't understand why and it's bothering me.
>
> *snip*
>
> > A question would be:
> >
Hi,
On Aug/01/2018, David Christensen wrote:
> On 08/01/2018 03:47 PM, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hello. :-)
>
>
> > I have a Debian Stretch and recently I added a new cyphered partition.
> > All works well but I don't understand why and it's bothering me.
> >
> > Setup:
> > $
40 matches
Mail list logo
