Hi Andy, Am 02.08.2018 um 13:01 schrieb Andy Smith: > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Martin Drescher wrote: [...] >> 4.9. It is not a real problem, that Debian is running well. > > It is likely that the kernel's idea of what is a "runnable" process > has changed since the vintage of the Red Hat kernel, compared to the > kernel which Debian stable uses. > > The Debian kernel will be much closer to upstream. The RHEL kernel > will be much older with backports only of security issues and > serious bugs. Tweaking of load average stats probably did not make > the grade for a backport.
That is what I thought. What I'm struggling with is, how to set alert levels new deployed Debian machines compared to the older ones. > Here is some more information about how Linux load average is > calculated. This may help you to narrow down which processes are > being considered differently between the two kernels. > > <http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2017-08-08/linux-load-averages.html> That is a quite good source you're suggesting here, thanks! > Cheers, > Andy That IS a good idea (did we talk before?): 30°C outside, 34°C in office: On my way to the Biergarten by now... Cheers, Martin! ---- Please consider the environment, () do you really need HTML email? /\
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
