I'm running Stretch, with kernel 4.9.0.7, and am trying to compile a new
kernel (preferably 4.17.11) into which I can boot.
The kernel builds successfully, but whenever I try booting into the new
kernel, I end up in emergency mode, with the error
Unit dev-disk-by\x2duuid-.device has fai
Hello,
What I really want is for this to work (it works without the --source-dir):
mkdir packages && multistrap -f /usr/share/multistrap/stretch.conf -d
./chroot --source-dir ./packages > multistrap_log.txt 2>&1
However, apt-get fails to find the source packages, but I can't figure
out why. I c
On 08/01/2018 01:00 AM, Long Wind wrote:
i don't like security update because i suspect it cause problem (some packaged
can't be installed) during stretch installation last time
I suggest that you obtain the debian-9.5.0-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso image
(via jigdo), burn it to CD/USB, configure your
On 02/08/18 13:05, Default User wrote:
So, if apt-get is for non-trivial upgrades, then why not for daily use?
I use it daily and for trivial upgrades.
Not efficient to have multiple choices. Debian, please choose one and
deprecate the others.
Debian is all about multiple choices. Debian tr
On 08/01/2018 03:47 PM, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
Hi,
Hello. :-)
I have a Debian Stretch and recently I added a new cyphered partition.
All works well but I don't understand why and it's bothering me.
Setup:
$ cat /etc/crypttab
m2_root_crypt UUID=4e655198-a111-... none luks,discard
m2_sw
There is no error at all in any way shape or form that I am given
indicating that there is a key range overflow.
I have successfully reached locations with various editions of openssh,
including in the 7 plus range...on a different port.
There are some indications likewise that my isp indeed b
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> 1.
> I am not using Linux, but an ssh client compiled from a combination of
> tools, Linux and otherwise, including putty.
> I have been very firm in not stating that I use Linux at all.
Kind of a bad move, what with this being a Debian (Linux) mailing list.
Lot of wasted
Deep thoughts:
Debian docs seem to say that apt-get is best for significant upgrades.
Why?
But that aptitude is best for daily package management.
Why?
So, if apt-get is for non-trivial upgrades, then why not for daily use?
And if aptitude is preferred for daily, use, why not for serious upgr
On 8/1/18 3:47 PM, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Debian Stretch and recently I added a new cyphered partition.
> All works well but I don't understand why and it's bothering me.
*snip*
> A question would be:
> a) How to enter the passphrase only once?
> b) When/where (scripts
1.
I am not using Linux, but an ssh client compiled from a combination of
tools, Linux and otherwise, including putty.
I have been very firm in not stating that I use Linux at all.
In fact the first sentence of my question stated that while the issue is
complex, the question, where dh keys are
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
>> She's been asked for logs and exact error message several times
>> now, and has not provided any.
> That is because according to the locations I am trying to visit, i. e.
> our organizations new server with pair network, m
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 01:28:17PM +0300, Алексей wrote:
Well, i can't use the pre-up direcrive without the iface statement. Or I can
use one on the first vlan interface however it seems not very obvious decision
to maintain it later.
You can actually put it on all of the interfaces that need t
Hi,
I have a Debian Stretch and recently I added a new cyphered partition.
All works well but I don't understand why and it's bothering me.
Setup:
$ cat /etc/crypttab
m2_root_crypt UUID=4e655198-a111-... none luks,discard
m2_swap_crypt UUID=56485640-8a04-... none luks,discard
ssd_dades_crypt UU
On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 19:54:03 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 12:00:41PM -0400, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> > I'm setting up a "just in case" replacement mailserver for my domain and my
> > local network. I'm using Debian Jessie, because the latest instructions for
> > setting th
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Dan Ritter wrote:
She's been asked for logs and exact error message several times
now, and has not provided any.
That is because according to the locations I am trying to visit, i. e.
our organizations new server with pair network, my attempts are not
producing logs a
Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 03:16:26PM -0400, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> On August 1, 2018 2:50:39 PM EDT, Karen Lewellen
>> wrote:
>> But without seeing logs, it's kind of impossible to see what's going on.
>
> She's been asked for logs and exact error message several times
> now, and
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 03:16:26PM -0400, Dan Purgert wrote:
> On August 1, 2018 2:50:39 PM EDT, Karen Lewellen
> wrote:
> But without seeing logs, it's kind of impossible to see what's going on.
She's been asked for logs and exact error message several times
now, and has not provided any.
-dsr
On 8/1/2018 9:16 PM, Dan Purgert wrote:
On August 1, 2018 2:50:39 PM EDT, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
Hi,
just a slight update..and correction of an idea below.
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Dan Purgert wrote:
Precisely. DH failures are typically because one end or the other is
trying to use an "out of
On August 1, 2018 2:50:39 PM EDT, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
>Hi,
>just a slight update..and correction of an idea below.
>
>
>
>On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Precisely. DH failures are typically because one end or the other is
>> trying to use an "out of bounds" keysize. E.g. you have
On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 19:57:32 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 01/08/2018 à 19:32, Brian a écrit :
> > On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 12:00:41 -0400, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> > >
> > > In the past, I referred to each NIC as eth0, eth1,. but now, these
> > > names
> > > are not permanent, and the de
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 12:00:41PM -0400, Mark Neidorff wrote:
I'm setting up a "just in case" replacement mailserver for my domain and my
local network. I'm using Debian Jessie, because the latest instructions for
setting the mailserver (qmail) are written for Jessie. The mailserver has 2
NICs
Hi,
just a slight update..and correction of an idea below.
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Dan Purgert wrote:
Precisely. DH failures are typically because one end or the other is
trying to use an "out of bounds" keysize. E.g. you have a SSH 7.x
client, and the server is 6.0 or lower.
Not the case here
On Tue 31 Jul 2018 at 16:27:27 (-0400), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I can't find any evidence for that without being told where to look.
>
> It was in the previous message:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libmpfr4
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libmpfr6
>
> >> Doesn't explain why on
On 8/1/18 1:00 AM, Long Wind wrote:
> i don't like security update because i suspect it cause problem (some
> packaged can't be installed) during stretch installation last time
>
> and i've used linux for a long time and i think it's stable even without
> security update. and installing update alw
Le 01/08/2018 à 19:32, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 12:00:41 -0400, Mark Neidorff wrote:
In the past, I referred to each NIC as eth0, eth1,. but now, these names
are not permanent, and the designation can change on boot. I looked at the
"Network Coinfiguration" document which did
On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 12:00:41 -0400, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> I'm setting up a "just in case" replacement mailserver for my domain and my
> local network. I'm using Debian Jessie, because the latest instructions for
> setting the mailserver (qmail) are written for Jessie. The mailserver has 2
Toss something like this for each interface into
/etc/udev/rules.d/10-interface-names.rules
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add",ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:80:2e:a4", NAME="1gig1"
Replace the mac address with the one your interface has.
-Ed
-Original Message-
From: Mark Neidorff
Sent: Wedne
I'm setting up a "just in case" replacement mailserver for my domain and my
local network. I'm using Debian Jessie, because the latest instructions for
setting the mailserver (qmail) are written for Jessie. The mailserver has 2
NICs (one for local network, and one for Internet).
In the past,
Ok
somehow the processes bypasses the group/namespace
under libvirt the cgroups.procs file (
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/machine/lxc-4296-deb4.libvirt-lxc/cgroup.procs )
shows only one process
with the lxc tools the cgroups.procs file (
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/lxc/debian/cgroup.procs )
shows up to
Markus Raps wrote:
> --=_d351436e7ed6bda8f193a786d6f710fa
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
> format=flowed
>
> Hello,
>
> iam currently trying to run LXC Containers with libvirt
> but the memory limit doesn't want to work
>
> in the container i see the f
Hello,
iam currently trying to run LXC Containers with libvirt
but the memory limit doesn't want to work
in the container i see the full 32GB from the Host OS
iam pretty sure that iam missing a configline in the xml
lxc-template ~ # free -m
totalusedfree share
Hi.
Well, i can't use the pre-up direcrive without the iface statement. Or I can
use one on the first vlan interface however it seems not very obvious decision
to maintain it later. I followed the advice by Pascal Hambourg (setting the
iface statement to manual) and it worked.
Thank you all fo
Richard Hector wrote:
> On 01/08/18 03:57, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:38:34AM -0400, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>> I have a problem now where each place I try to visit using my ssh
>>> client, and my sftp one, I am getting a dh key exchange failure.
>>> using the -v command is not
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 15:14:57 +1200
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 01/08/18 11:11, Default User wrote:
>
> synaptic? No love for synaptic?
>
> > Would Debian please just settle on one, and stick with it?
>
> They do different things at different levels and seem to play nicely
> together.
>
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 17:49:52 -0400 (EDT)
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Hi
> just putting my answer at the top.
> My client does have a log option, will aim for that. still again my
> first priority is finding a place to test with a nonstandard port.
> then I can be sure it really is all about port 2
35 matches
Mail list logo
