On 04/28/2015 02:10 AM, 慕冬亮 wrote:
About stability, I wonder testing version is enough for me?
Though I certainly see someone in the mailing list saying that testing
version is very stable , I want to ask it again? Is it stable for
personal computer ,not workstation or server?
Thank you in adv
https://wiki.debian.org/NTPI think this is useful for you! If you want detailed
configuration , you can refer
debian-handbook.http://debian-handbook.info/mudongliang
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: matth...@bodenbinder.de
> Subject: no ntp installed
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 07:38:48 +
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 01:33:06 -0400
> From: wayward4...@gmail.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: testing or stable
>
> On 04/28/2015 01:00 AM, mudongliang wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 13:38 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> >> I'd recommend staying with jessie for a few
Hi,
I installed debian 8 on one of my PCs and got into trouble with extra long boot
times of > 2 min. I found out that it due to systemd-udev-settle.service. My PC
is using lvm and that somehow interferes with systemd-udev-settle.service. The
web tells that systemd-udev-settle.service is needed
Hi,
I installed debian 8 on one of my PCs and found out that no ntp or ntpdate or
rdate is installed. How is debian 8 synchronizing the system time?
Greetings
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
On 04/28/2015 01:00 AM, mudongliang wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 13:38 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
I'd recommend staying with jessie for a few months since testing is
going to be just the same until new packages start popping up from sid.
Personally I've been using jessie for about the same
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 13:38 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> I'd recommend staying with jessie for a few months since testing is
> going to be just the same until new packages start popping up from sid.
>
> Personally I've been using jessie for about the same time and intend to
> move to stretc
Bob Proulx writes:
> csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Bob Proulx writes:
>> > Michael Biebl wrote:
>> >> Any idea why it changes the MAC?
>> >
>> > Hmm... Is 'macchanger' involved in this in any way?
>>
>> I just installed macchanger and run:
>
> Wait! That was NOT a request to install macchanger.
> have you tried installing guest-additions for that vbox version?
Yes, but that did not help.
Dietmar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/trinity-373
2015-04-28 11:58 GMT+08:00 :
> Hi,
>
> I just installed Jessie in a Virtualbox environment (running on Win7 64Bit)
> without any problems.
> The installed system starts up fine.
>
> But when I try to open a terminal in the window manager, the icon and a
> "waiting cursor" appears for some second
Hi,
I just installed Jessie in a Virtualbox environment (running on Win7 64Bit)
without any problems.
The installed system starts up fine.
But when I try to open a terminal in the window manager, the icon and a
"waiting cursor" appears for some seconds, then they close. Seems that the
terminal
Am 28.04.2015 um 03:29 schrieb Bill Baker:
> That's what I thought at first, too. But when I ran 'apt-get remove
> consolekit', it didn't report any dependencies. I expected to see a
> list as long as my arm, but nope.
consolekit is pretty much unused in jessie. There are only very few
packages
On 2015-04-27 21:29:07 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 at 09:24 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Yes, one can write a small script that also removes blank lines that
> > come after a Gtk-WARNING line.
>
> My brief research seems to indicate the blank line is actually printed
> _before_ th
On 04/27/2015 09:26 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 at 09:19 PM, Bill Baker wrote:
>
>> On a whim, I decided to see what would happen if I uninstalled
>> consolekit. Lo and behold, after uninstalling it, I was able to
>> upgrade the kernel normally and run a normal upgrade. Thanks to
>> e
On 2015-04-27 20:23:48 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> "Here" those annoying messages are sent to ~/.xsession-errors which has
> been open about 9 days and is approaching 58 MiB in size. To be fair,
> most of the garbage is not coming from glib/gtk but rather from Firefox
> (I am not using Iceweasel
On 04/27/2015 at 09:24 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-04-27 20:52:15 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 04/27/2015 at 08:44 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>
>>> I completely agree. I would never do that. Writing a shell
>>> function that greps out the Gtk-WARNING lines may be better.
>>
>> N
On 04/27/2015 at 09:19 PM, Bill Baker wrote:
> On a whim, I decided to see what would happen if I uninstalled
> consolekit. Lo and behold, after uninstalling it, I was able to
> upgrade the kernel normally and run a normal upgrade. Thanks to
> everyone who offered help. Replying to your respons
On 2015-04-27 20:52:15 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 at 08:44 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I completely agree. I would never do that. Writing a shell function
> > that greps out the Gtk-WARNING lines may be better.
>
> Not ideal, though, since there are (as I understand matters) oft
"Here" those annoying messages are sent to ~/.xsession-errors which has
been open about 9 days and is approaching 58 MiB in size. To be fair,
most of the garbage is not coming from glib/gtk but rather from Firefox
(I am not using Iceweasel) complaining about javascript this or that.
Oh well, "dis
On a whim, I decided to see what would happen if I uninstalled
consolekit. Lo and behold, after uninstalling it, I was able to upgrade
the kernel normally and run a normal upgrade. Thanks to everyone who
offered help. Replying to your responses helped me think through this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 04/27/2015 at 08:44 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-04-27 14:57:05 -0500, Tim Kelley wrote:
>
>> Well, typing it is cumbersome so you can do in ~/.bash_aliases or
>> ~/.bashrc
>>
>> alias emacs='emacs > /dev/null 2>&1'
>>
>> I agree though, that is annoying, and a lot of GTK programs do
On 2015-04-27 14:57:05 -0500, Tim Kelley wrote:
> Well, typing it is cumbersome so you can do in ~/.bash_aliases or ~/.bashrc
>
> alias emacs='emacs > /dev/null 2>&1'
>
> I agree though, that is annoying, and a lot of GTK programs do that. And
> sending the output to null isn't really the right a
On 2015-04-27 13:58:11 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Most mail transfer agents such as Postfix and others add a valid
> Message-Id if one is not present.
I still receive messages without a Message-Id, though this is rare.
The only example I remember is some e-ticket system, using qmail as
its MTA. An
I'm using msmtp to send mail, but I suspect the same problem would occur
with any of the other mail programs. Whenever I try to send a message I
get the error "TLS handshake failed. Operation timed out." There sems to
be a mismatch between the default TLS settings and those of my mail
provider'
Am 28.04.2015 um 01:43 schrieb The Wanderer:
> On 04/27/2015 at 07:15 PM, Bill Baker wrote:
>> Here is the output from sudo apt-get install linux-image-586:
>>
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree
>> Reading state information... Done
>> You might want to run 'apt-get
On 2015-04-27 11:04:51 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Exactly. Saying "But this matters in a POSIX-compliant filesystem"
> is very different from "But with the current solution". To me,
> a "current solution" is an concrete implementation, not a POSIX
> specification; the latter is a target.
I reall
On 04/27/2015 at 07:15 PM, Bill Baker wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 07:05 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>> A few thoughts:
>>
>> 1. Is there a reason why you need 'apt-get -f install packagename'?
>> Does it error out if you just run 'apt-get install packagename'?
>
> I used -f because the output suggest
As I understand it, it is generally considered unprofessional to have your
application print warnings.
Tim Kelley
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Erwan David wrote:
> > Juha Heinanen a écrit :
> > > Is there anything that can be done to get rid of those warnings? Which
>
On 04/27/2015 07:04 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Have you rebooted, using that kernel?
> What does uname -r say?
I have rebooted, but the new kernel has not installed. Here is uname -r:
2.6.32-5-486
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
I intentionally split the thread since I didn't think this would help
the original poster but might be interesting to others.
The Wanderer wrote:
> By a "standard installation", I believe that page means the installation
> you'll get if you select the "Standard system" task at install time, and
>
On 04/27/2015 07:05 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> A few thoughts:
>
> 1. Is there a reason why you need 'apt-get -f install packagename'? Does
> it error out if you just run 'apt-get install packagename'?
I used -f because the output suggested I use it.
> 2. What happens if you try to install linux
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:39:56 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Erwan David wrote:
> > Juha Heinanen a écrit :
> > > Is there anything that can be done to get rid of those warnings?
> > > Which package the bug lies? Is there any hope that the bugs are
> > > fixed before the next Debian release?
>
> To f
On 04/27/2015 at 06:57 PM, Bill Baker wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 06:23 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Am 28.04.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Bill Baker:
>>> Anyone have any ideas on what I can try next?
>>>
>> First upgrade your kernel to the wheezy version (reboot) and everything
>> will be fine.
>>
>> Dist-
Am 28.04.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Bill Baker:
> On 04/27/2015 06:23 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 28.04.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Bill Baker:
>>> Over the weekend, I upgraded my headless ssh server from wheezy to jessie.
>>> It's an older computer, built in the year 2000 with an AMD-K6 processor.
>>> Una
On 04/27/2015 06:23 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 28.04.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Bill Baker:
>> Over the weekend, I upgraded my headless ssh server from wheezy to jessie.
>> It's an older computer, built in the year 2000 with an AMD-K6 processor.
>> Uname -a returns the following:
>>
>> Linux shunnel
Erwan David wrote:
> Juha Heinanen a écrit :
> > Is there anything that can be done to get rid of those warnings? Which
> > package the bug lies? Is there any hope that the bugs are fixed before
> > the next Debian release?
To fix the bugs associated with those Gtk-WARNING messages it would be
n
Am 28.04.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Bill Baker:
> Over the weekend, I upgraded my headless ssh server from wheezy to jessie.
> It's an older computer, built in the year 2000 with an AMD-K6 processor.
> Uname -a returns the following:
>
> Linux shunnel 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Mon Feb 25 00:22:26 UTC 2013 i586 G
Over the weekend, I upgraded my headless ssh server from wheezy to jessie.
It's an older computer, built in the year 2000 with an AMD-K6 processor.
Uname -a returns the following:
Linux shunnel 2.6.32-5-486 #1 Mon Feb 25 00:22:26 UTC 2013 i586 GNU/Linux
Since upgrading, whenever I try to do an a
On Monday 27 April 2015 16:46:25 Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> I just had a big mistake - I installed the netinstall version which is on
> the main debian.org
That isn't per se a mistake. I would say that it is much the best choice. If
it caused you problems you must have installed it wrongly. I al
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:49:50 +0300
Juha Heinanen wrote:
> after upgrading to jessie that came with emacs24, i get the warnings
> below to terminal window each time i start emacs in x11 environment.
> any hints on how to get rid of them?
>
> -- juha
>
> (emacs:12957): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsi
On 04/27/2015 at 03:46 PM, hos...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
> The information on installed size does not seem to be
> correct. On the page
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apds02.html.en
> there is the statement:
> "A standard installation for the amd64 architecture, including all
>
The information on installed size does not seem to be
correct. On the page
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apds02.html.en
there is the statement:
"A standard installation for the amd64 architecture, including all
standard packages and using the default kernel, takes up 822MB of disk
s
Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> I just had a big mistake - I installed the netinstall version which
> is on the main debian.org website - Download link. It had only the
> main system without anything - like Gnome...
The netinstall version requires the network to install GNOME and other
desktop environmen
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Nicolas George wrote:
> > Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> > > /^Message-ID:\s+(<\S+>)( \(added by .*\))?$/i or next;
> >
> > I have never seen this "added by" in my mails, but assuming it is
> > necessary for you,
>
> Yes, obviously. This came from some MTA's when the
Well, typing it is cumbersome so you can do in ~/.bash_aliases or ~/.bashrc
alias emacs='emacs > /dev/null 2>&1'
I agree though, that is annoying, and a lot of GTK programs do that. And
sending the output to null isn't really the right answer, since you'll miss
actual errors that are important. A
On 2015-04-27, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>
> Typing emacs >/dev/null 2>&1 is too cumbersome and starting from menu
Create an alias.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.
On 28/04/2015, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 04/27/2015 at 02:12 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
>> The next more stable version, is the "olderstable" (?) version,
>> which is the last previous "oldstable" version, and, which has a
>> version name, that is bubbled down from the "oldstable" version, when
>> a
Hello.
I installed system of Debian/Wheezy 64bit. In my system the videocard Gigabyte
Radeon R9 280, GV - R928WF3OC-3GB is installed. I established packages:
fglrx-driver libgl1-fglrx-glx fglrx-modules-dkms amd-clinfo amd-opencl-icd
fglrx-atieventsd fglrx-control libgl1-fglrx-glx xvba-va-driver.
Chris Bannister wrote:
> Good explanation, changed subject to reflect that.
For everyone who has this problem in their mail reader that will be
the start of the new topic discussion for them. For everyone else we
see it as a correctly threaded response to the message that started
this topic of di
On 04/27/2015 at 02:11 PM, songbird wrote:
> Joris Bolsens wrote:
>
>> sorry, I was under the impression that it went wheezy -> Jessie ->
>> Sid
>
> a few days ago that would have been accurate, but as of the release
> of Jessie Wheezy is now oldstable, Jessie is stable, testing is
> testing (bu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:03:58PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> [ 409.772773] ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> [ 409.772776] ata2.00: cmd 61/28:88:e0:a3:04/00:00:02:00:00/40 tag 17 ncq
> 20480 out
> [ 409.772776] res 50/00:28:e0:a3:04/00:00:02:00:00/40 Emask 0x10
> (ATA
Le 27/04/2015 21:16, Juha Heinanen a écrit :
> Tim Kelley writes:
>
>> If you just use the console emacs, you can install the emacs-nox version of
>> 24.
> In this case, i used x11 emacs, but started it from console.
>
>> In anycase, they’re just warnings, and can be ignored.
> Yes, I know, but the
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> In short, ext3 is bad for renames, but if Bob Proulx's suggestion
> were implemented (without a workaround such that caching the whole
> directory after it is opened[*]), it would be much worse as arbitrary
> entries would be missed in a readdir sequence.
To be clear I did
David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Kushal Kumaran:
> > Bob Proulx writes:
> > > If a directory became full it was easy to extend it
> > > by writing the array longer. But if an early entry in the array was
> > > deleted the system would zero it out rather than move each and every
> > > entry in the fil
Tim Kelley writes:
> If you just use the console emacs, you can install the emacs-nox version of
> 24.
In this case, i used x11 emacs, but started it from console.
> In anycase, they’re just warnings, and can be ignored.
Yes, I know, but the warnings consume the whole page of the terminal
windo
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:59:58 -0500
Tim Kelley wrote:
> True that. When you run unstable or testing it's best to take great
> care when updating or installing anything, as in sid installing
> something can trigger a shitstorm depending on what was uploaded that
> day ... stable only for me these d
If you just use the console emacs, you can install the emacs-nox version of
24. In anycase, they’re just warnings, and can be ignored. It’s just
stating something some other packager did was deprecated but still
functional .. you can start emacs with emacs >/dev/null 2>&1 if you like,
or not start
True that. When you run unstable or testing it's best to take great care
when updating or installing anything, as in sid installing something can
trigger a shitstorm depending on what was uploaded that day ... stable only
for me these days.
Tim Kelley
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Sven Hartg
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:12:02 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
>
> My understanding, and, I stand to be corrected in this belief,
> follows, below.
>
> Sid = "experimental" - the name Sid is permanent for the experimental
> version, and is so named, because the character Sid, in Toy Story, the
> origin
after upgrading to jessie that came with emacs24, i get the warnings
below to terminal window each time i start emacs in x11 environment.
any hints on how to get rid of them?
-- juha
(emacs:12957): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: gtk-widgets.css:57:17:
Theming engine 'unico' not found
(ema
On 04/27/2015 at 02:12 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 28/04/2015, Joris Bolsens wrote:
>> sorry, I was under the impression that it went wheezy -> Jessie ->
>> Sid
>>
>
> Hello.
>
> I believe that this is part of the confusion that occurs, due to the
> use of version names for versions and status
Brian wrote:
On Sun 26 Apr 2015 at 07:06:33 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
[cc: debian-ble...@lists.debian.org Reply to:
debian-user@lists.debian.org]
Is there a USENET group or mailing list aimed at really small Debian
inspired systems?
In general - probably "no". In particular
http://lin
I think the reason some prefer apt is that aptitude has more finely grained
dependency handling and the dependencies have grown tremendously over the
years (over 40,000 discrete packages now). Even though apt will not break
anything, it's never a bad idea to use aptitude as it always offer
solution
Joris Bolsens wrote:
>
> sorry, I was under the impression that it went wheezy -> Jessie -> Sid
a few days ago that would have been accurate,
but as of the release of Jessie Wheezy is now
oldstable, Jessie is stable, testing is testing
(but some people will call it Stretch even if
Stretch isn't
On 28/04/2015, Joris Bolsens wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> sorry, I was under the impression that it went wheezy -> Jessie -> Sid
>
Hello.
I believe that this is part of the confusion that occurs, due to the
use of version names for versions and status.
My under
On 04/27/2015 at 12:49 PM, Joris Bolsens wrote:
> sorry, I was under the impression that it went wheezy -> Jessie ->
> Sid
It goes stable -> testing -> unstable.
Each of these three has a codename.
The codename for unstable is always sid.
The codenames for the other releases change whenever a
debian-user:
I have a computer:
Intel DQ67SWR motherboard
Intel Core i7-2600S processor with Intel HD Graphics 2000
DVI analog port
Intel DVI to VGA adapter (came with motherboard)
IOGEAR GCS78 KVM switch
LG EW224T-PN LCD monitor
DP port
StarTect DP2VGA2 DP to VGA adapter
V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
sorry, I was under the impression that it went wheezy -> Jessie -> Sid
I meant stretch xD
On 04/27/2015 09:48 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> So if you want to go on tinkering, update to Stretch! Otherwise
> stick to Jessie.
>
> Or you could go to Sid
On Monday 27 April 2015 17:02:17 Joris Bolsens wrote:
> I've been using Debian Jessie for ~ a year now, now that it is stable
> should I update to sid? or stick with jessie?
Why Sid? Why not Stretch?
> I enjoy tinkering with everything, so I'm OK with things breaking or
> needing some special co
On Monday 27 April 2015 15:01:21 Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 04/26/2015 08:46 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 04/26/2015 07:23 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> >> As part of my CentOS-to-Debian visionquest, I'm trying to enable SELinux
> >> on Jessie, but I haven't been able to install the policy:
> >>
> >>E:
I'd recommend staying with jessie for a few months since testing is
going to be just the same until new packages start popping up from sid.
Personally I've been using jessie for about the same time and intend to
move to stretch in a few months - quite possibly after the first couple
of point r
Am 2015-04-27 01:23, schrieb Ian Pilcher:
As part of my CentOS-to-Debian visionquest, I'm trying to enable
SELinux
on Jessie, but I haven't been able to install the policy:
E: Package 'selinux-policy-default' has no installation candidate
Does it simply not exist yet?
It isn't part of the
On 27 April 2015 at 17:05, Pete Orrall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Joris Bolsens
> wrote:
> > I've been using Debian Jessie for ~ a year now, now that it is stable
> > should I update to sid? or stick with jessie?
>
I guess you could move either to be testing or sid from jessie.
Joris Bolsens wrote:
> I've been using Debian Jessie for ~ a year now, now that it is stable
> should I update to sid? or stick with jessie?
> I enjoy tinkering with everything, so I'm OK with things breaking or
> needing some special configuration, hell I'll even patch a thing and
> recompile f
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:09:39PM +0600, Ivan Petrov wrote:
> How pidgin whatsapp plugin can be installed on wheezy?
Not tried, but this should get you started (as you've not told us what -
if anything - you've tried so far):
# apt-get install git build-essential
$ git clone g...@github.com:davi
How pidgin whatsapp plugin can be installed on wheezy?
I
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/mhljfj$8hp$1...@ger.gmane.org
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Joris Bolsens wrote:
> I've been using Debian Jessie for ~ a year now, now that it is stable
> should I update to sid? or stick with jessie?
Jessie was released as the new stable distribution this past Saturday
(4-25-2015). You shouldn't have any problems runnin
Quoting Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.net):
> On 2015-04-26 13:26:41 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Quoting Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.net):
> > > On 2015-04-24 22:01:37 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > > Quoting Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.net):
> > > > > So, I would say that this is a
I've been using Debian Jessie for ~ a year now, now that it is stable
should I update to sid? or stick with jessie?
I enjoy tinkering with everything, so I'm OK with things breaking or
needing some special configuration, hell I'll even patch a thing and
recompile from source if I have to (I know,
Hi Everyone!
I just had a big mistake - I installed the netinstall version which is on
the main debian.org
website - Download link. It had only the main system without anything -
like Gnome...
So I downloaded again - and I had choose the x64 version .iso with Gnome...
After install it worked al
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:19:36AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I just updated and upgraded a 'testing' system (so listed in
> sources.list) and aptitude shows no installed packages. Here's a
> typical aptitude entry:
>
> i A apache2 2.4.10-9
>
> and another:
>
> ih perl 5.20.1-5
Quoting Jörg-Volker Peetz (jvpe...@web.de):
> Correction of the "jot" command arguments:
>
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 04/25/2015 16:15:
> >
> >>
> >> for i in `seq 5000`
> >> do
> >> date=$((1000+i))
> >> cat < "$dir/cur/$date.1.host:2,S"
> >
> >
> > the situation becomes much worse i
Hello:
I just updated and upgraded a 'testing' system (so listed in
sources.list) and aptitude shows no installed packages. Here's a
typical aptitude entry:
i A apache2 2.4.10-9
and another:
ih perl 5.20.1-5
(The 'h' because I put it on hold when I saw it was among many
potentially broken pa
On Mon, 4/27/15, Brian wrote:
> Not only is there no TAB completion and command history but you have to
> handle module loading yourself. 'insmod normal' and 'insmod linux' are
> needed.
I decided to follow the path you suggested as it seemed the simplest and
easiest for me to do. Here's w
Did you look in the sources for sid? You should try grabbing that, and
compiling with apt. Much preferable to installing from a PPA for Ubuntu ...
On Apr 27, 2015 7:27 AM, "Robert Spiteri" wrote:
> Dear Sir / Madam,
>
> I wish to install Photivo in Debian Jessie but I am not managing.
>
> I alrea
On 04/26/2015 08:46 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
On 04/26/2015 07:23 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
As part of my CentOS-to-Debian visionquest, I'm trying to enable SELinux
on Jessie, but I haven't been able to install the policy:
E: Package 'selinux-policy-default' has no installation candidate
Does it si
Richard Owlett wrote:
> [cc: debian-ble...@lists.debian.org Reply to:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org]
>
> Is there a USENET group or mailing list aimed at really small
> Debian inspired systems?
>
> The system described in "How To Build a Minimal Linux System from
> Source Code"
> [http://users.
On Sun 26 Apr 2015 at 07:06:33 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> [cc: debian-ble...@lists.debian.org Reply to:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org]
>
> Is there a USENET group or mailing list aimed at really small Debian
> inspired systems?
In general - probably "no". In particular
http://linux.voyag
On Mon 27 Apr 2015 at 14:12:03 +0200, Robert Spiteri wrote:
> I wish to install Photivo in Debian Jessie but I am not managing.
>
> I already tried to install it in Debian Wheezy but got broken packages and
> could not sort it out. I tried to follow instructiona found on the
> internet but to no
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 07:06:33AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
[cc: debian-ble...@lists.debian.org Reply to: debian-user@lists.debian.org]
Is there a USENET group or mailing list aimed at really small Debian
inspired systems?
You mean like embedded systems?
Not real
> > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy contrib non-free main
> > updates
>
> Assuming that this is all on one line, "updates" is a bogus keyword.
> You probably want something like:
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/de
Thank you, this confirmed it was linux (3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/b54d10f9e0184999b2be7d22b2b11...@stsdcfs01.techsolllc.com
Am 27.04.2015 um 15:05 schrieb Grant Albitz:
> Sorry for the newb question. I am trying to determine the kernel version of
> Jessie. Uname -r produces: 3.16.0-4-amd64
>
> I have seen other references to 3.16.7 however, and I know 3.16.7 was the
> latest 3.16.x. Is 3.16.0-4 really the equivalent
Sorry for the newb question. I am trying to determine the kernel version of
Jessie. Uname -r produces: 3.16.0-4-amd64
I have seen other references to 3.16.7 however, and I know 3.16.7 was the
latest 3.16.x. Is 3.16.0-4 really the equivalent of 3.16.7? either way can
someone explain to me how I
Summary: I had annoying resets of the SATA bus with a 8 Series/C220 Series
Chipset controller and a HGST Travelstar 7K1000 drive. I recently managed to
stop them and as far as I currently know I am satisfied; I write this mail
in the hope that it may be useful for anyone having similar issues. If y
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:37:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Update-manager's little triangular icon won't go away. If I can
> copy/paste its output:
>
> But I cannot do anything except a screenshot. Why do the gui writers
> saddle us with such broken software?
Any numbe
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:30:19PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm a longtime user of Red Hat-style distributions (RHL, RHEL, CentOS,
> Fedora, etc.). My home router/firewall is a 32-bit VIA C7 system that
> is currently running CentOS 6. I really want to move this to a more
> modern stable distr
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:12:03 +0200
Robert Spiteri wrote:
> Dear Sir / Madam,
>
> I wish to install Photivo in Debian Jessie but I am not managing.
>
> I already tried to install it in Debian Wheezy but got broken
> packages and could not sort it out. I tried to follow instructiona
> found on t
Oh, also, you may some some habits that you can dispense with, such as
looking around the internet for your software instead of your distribution.
Debian has everything, pretty much, try the Debian repos first. And don't
willy-nilly add repos to Debian without knowing what you're doing ... there
ar
Dear Sir / Madam,
I wish to install Photivo in Debian Jessie but I am not managing.
I already tried to install it in Debian Wheezy but got broken packages and
could not sort it out. I tried to follow instructiona found on the
internet but to no avail.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
I aplogis
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
