Hi all,
Building external modules using:
export MODULE_LOC=
make-kpkg --revision= modules_install
Using a 2.4.X kernel (e.g 2.4.22), it works perfectly.
I wanted to build it for kernel 2.6.6 (sources from kernel.org), but it
fails.
##
Making all in lirc_i2c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont know whats going on, I just tried to build a new kernel and I
dont appear to have make-kpkg. I did a netinstall, running
unstable/testing.
What package is make-kpkg part of? Ive tried searching for it, but I
cant find it anywhere.
Please help me out and tell me
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dont know whats going on, I just tried to build a new kernel and I
> dont appear to have make-kpkg. I did a netinstall, running
> unstable/testing.
>
> What package is make-kpkg part of? Ive tried searching for it, but I
> can
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 15:30:59 +0200
Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What package is make-kpkg part of? Ive tried searching for it, but I
> > cant find it anywhere.
>
> apt-get install kernel-package
>
> Anders
Thank you very much, problem solved!
Ed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont know whats going on, I just tried to build a new kernel and I
dont appear to have make-kpkg. I did a netinstall, running
unstable/testing.
What package is make-kpkg part of? Ive tried searching for it, but I
cant find it anywhere.
It's in the "kern
On Saturday 10 April 2004 15:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What package is make-kpkg part of? Ive tried searching for it, but I
> cant find it anywhere.
apt-get install kernel-package
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.2.1 on Debian GNU/Linux
--
To UNSUB
I dont know whats going on, I just tried to build a new kernel and I
dont appear to have make-kpkg. I did a netinstall, running
unstable/testing.
What package is make-kpkg part of? Ive tried searching for it, but I
cant find it anywhere.
Please help me out and tell me where I can get this!
Many
I didn't touch the Makefile, but temporarily repointed the gcc symlink
to gcc-3.2 and everything was happy (lm-sensors is working again).
After compiling the modules I changed the symlink back to gcc-3.3.
Maybe gcc could use an /etc/alternatives entry :^)
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:44:01PM -0300
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:43:22AM -0300, Theo Cabrerizo Diem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using unstable (gcc 3.3) and won't build. I've installed gcc-3.2
> package, changed HOSTCC and CC variables in kernel Makefile to gcc-3.2
> and worked fine !...
>
> Maybe this isn't the best solution available, but
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:43:22AM -0300, Theo Cabrerizo Diem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using unstable (gcc 3.3) and won't build. I've installed gcc-3.2
> package, changed HOSTCC and CC variables in kernel Makefile to gcc-3.2
> and worked fine !...
I did that too, too b
I didn't touch the Makefile, but temporarily repointed the gcc symlink
to gcc-3.2 and everything was happy (lm-sensors is working again).
After compiling the modules I changed the symlink back to gcc-3.3.
Maybe gcc could use an /etc/alternatives entry :^)
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:44:01PM -0300
Hi Ross,
I don't know ... =) ... I only changed CC but a module (can't remmember
if was i2c, lm-sensors or mppe) still used gcc ... so I changed HOSTCC
too ...
I was building a 2.4.20 kernel with xfs, preempt, freeswan and mppe in a
Debian unstable.
and yes .. seems to work all patches together
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:43:22AM -0300, Theo Cabrerizo Diem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using unstable (gcc 3.3) and won't build. I've installed gcc-3.2
> package, changed HOSTCC and CC variables in kernel Makefile to gcc-3.2
> and worked fine !...
>
> Maybe this isn't the best solution available, but
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:42:00PM +0200, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> >Since about a week (maybe a bit longer), I can't build working kernel
> >modules anymore. An example is lm-sensors (using lm-sensors-src) and the
> >CVS snapshots of the DRI stuff (packag
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:43:22AM -0300, Theo Cabrerizo Diem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using unstable (gcc 3.3) and won't build. I've installed gcc-3.2
> package, changed HOSTCC and CC variables in kernel Makefile to gcc-3.2
> and worked fine !...
I did that too, too b
Hi,
I'm using unstable (gcc 3.3) and won't build. I've installed gcc-3.2
package, changed HOSTCC and CC variables in kernel Makefile to gcc-3.2
and worked fine !...
Maybe this isn't the best solution available, but worked to me ;o)
[]'s
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 20:57, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Wed,
Hi all,
Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
Since about a week (maybe a bit longer), I can't build working kernel
modules anymore. An example is lm-sensors (using lm-sensors-src) and the
CVS snapshots of the DRI stuff (packages made by Michel Daenzer).
I'm running testing, and update/dist-upgrade almost e
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:42:00PM +0200, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> >Since about a week (maybe a bit longer), I can't build working kernel
> >modules anymore. An example is lm-sensors (using lm-sensors-src) and the
> >CVS snapshots of the DRI stuff (packag
Hi all,
Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
Since about a week (maybe a bit longer), I can't build working kernel
modules anymore. An example is lm-sensors (using lm-sensors-src) and the
CVS snapshots of the DRI stuff (packages made by Michel Daenzer).
I'm running testing, and update/dist-upgrade almost
rm-module-trunk-src package (by
> Michel) compiled (using make-kpkg modules-image) and installed (dpkg -i
> <.deb file>) nicely, on April 27th. If I try to build that same package
> now, I get a lot of Unresolved symbols in the depmod phase of the
> installation (carried out
ichel) compiled (using make-kpkg modules-image) and installed (dpkg -i
<.deb file>) nicely, on April 27th. If I try to build that same package
now, I get a lot of Unresolved symbols in the depmod phase of the
installation (carried out by dpkg).
The same goes for lm-sensors, as I already
21 matches
Mail list logo
