On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> | Jul 12 18:41:07 zbasel named[5317]: client 24.93.40.63#38829: error
> sending response: unexpected error
>
> I've never received any complaints about DNS problems nor did I see any
> stability problems. IP addresses seem com
On 8/15/07, Pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) What if someone (and I am sure it happens more often than you may
> realize) who is clueless about computers decides to download Debian,
> installs it, get hacked, trojaned horsed, their credit cards numbers
> stolen, etc.
> It is called responsibili
On 8/20/07, Jonathan Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this is the wrong place for this, but:
>
> Does anyone know of a place I can get information on setting up CISP (VISA
> credit card) compliant Debian systems - or Linux in general, if there's no
> Debian-specific info. I've been sear
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Jan Luehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For the last question, I see several solutions:
> > - the user has to read the DSA and handle it himself
>
> Since some keys are generated automatically, (e.g. ssh host keys) users will
> have to regenerate keys,they ha
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du mardi 13 mai 2008, vers 22:21, "John
> Keimel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
>
> >> Since some keys are generated automatically, (e.g.
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Steve Suehring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that doing either of these will result in host key failures and
> warnings for any clients attempting to connect to you. This is
> especially bad if you have things like rsync over ssh in a cron job.
> Moral of
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since two days (approx.) I'm seeing an extremely high number of apparently
> coordinated (well, at least they are trying the same list of usernames) brute
> force attempts from IP addresses spread all over
finally replaced the drive - to my detriment)
I'm not looking to make a reboot until I absolutely have to. So I've not
touched the kernel lately. However, looking at some of the new admin
features of grsecurity, I think I'll add it to my so-called development
box.
average: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00
1:35pm up 171 days, 4:22, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01
13:35:52 up 171 days, 4:25, 4 users, load average: 0.08, 0.05, 0.01
Hope this helps...
--
==
+ It's simply not | John Keimel+
+ RFC1149 compliant!| [EMAIL PROTECTED]+
+ | http://www.keimel.com +
==
n be encrypted with the
Debian Security Contact key (key ID 0x363CCD95).
This FAQ was two links off of the www.debian.org home page.
j
--
==
+ It's simply not | John Keimel+
+ RFC1149 complian
act, the best answer.
For extra coverage, I'll cc: the package maintainer (according to
packages.debian.org) for this package.
HTH
j
--
======
+ It's simply not | John Keimel+
+ RFC1149 compliant!| [EMAIL PROTECTED]+
+ | http://www.keimel.com +
==
would be posted.
Please Kjetil, don't take my email as a "RTFM" type dismissive answer
as I mean no disrespect at all to you, but wanted to inform others on
the list that this update info is expected sometime today...
j
--
tinuing inclusion in subsequent kernels (2.4.24
and later).
I could be wrong ;)
j
--
==
+ It's simply not | John Keimel+
+ RFC1149 compliant!| [EMAIL PROTECTED]+
+
ntial under HIPPA.
This just sounds wrong all around. I'd suggest significant amount of
C.Y.A. activity on your part.
Good luck.
*shakes head*
Sorry I can't be more helpful otherwise.
--
======
+ It's simply not | John
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:45:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:19:48PM -0500, John Keimel wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:11:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I've been asked to place a sniffer on a network that handles HIPP
n be encrypted with the
Debian Security Contact key (key ID 0x363CCD95).
This FAQ was two links off of the www.debian.org home page.
j
--
==
+ It's simply not | John Keimel+
+ RFC1149 complian
act, the best answer.
For extra coverage, I'll cc: the package maintainer (according to
packages.debian.org) for this package.
HTH
j
--
======
+ It's simply not | John Keimel+
+ RFC1149 compliant!| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would be posted.
Please Kjetil, don't take my email as a "RTFM" type dismissive answer
as I mean no disrespect at all to you, but wanted to inform others on
the list that this update info is expected sometime today...
j
--
tinuing inclusion in subsequent kernels (2.4.24
and later).
I could be wrong ;)
j
--
==
+ It's simply not | John Keimel+
+ RFC1149 compliant!| [EMAIL PROTECTED]+
+
ntial under HIPPA.
This just sounds wrong all around. I'd suggest significant amount of
C.Y.A. activity on your part.
Good luck.
*shakes head*
Sorry I can't be more helpful otherwise.
--
======
+ It's simply not | John
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:45:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:19:48PM -0500, John Keimel wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:11:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I've been asked to place a sniffer on a network that handles HIPP
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Chip Panarchy wrote:
> So, how do I secure my PC at a Wireless Hotspot?
>
This is on the borderline of debian-user and debian-security. People
will argue both ways on that.
Use a VPN or an SSH tunnel to a trusted source.
I use one of my servers, either a VPS I r
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Ashley Taylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have any decent filter rules for Gmail so I can stop receiving
> this nonsense without unsubscribing?
> Thanks.
http://tinyurl.com/2b3g2l4
Also, since you need it:
http://tinyurl.com/ybpctcz
Please particularly note it
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Ashley Taylor wrote:
> Sorry, this is the way Gmail handles replies.
>
No, it's the way YOU handle replies. Gmail happens to place the cursor
at the top of the email, setting you up for a jeopardy reply. It's
trivial to scroll down a little and type within the mes
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Ashley Taylor wrote:
> stfu and stop replying to this chain. This is debian-security, not
> debian-childish-trolling.
It's called a thread not a chain. Chain e-mails are also frowned upon. Thanks.
j
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.de
25 matches
Mail list logo
