Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thorin Oakenshield
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:38:45PM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 16:16:35 -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: > :0: > * ^Subject: unsubscribe > * ^X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > /var/mail/probably-uninteresting Why not :0: * ^Subject: unsubscribe * ^X-Mailing-List: <[

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thorin Oakenshield
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:39:35AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote: > > Why not > > :0: > > * ^Subject: unsubscribe > > * ^X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > /dev/null > > > > instead? > > I don't like the idea that my system is deleting emails I have never > seen. Once a month I find the time

RE: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thomas Horsten
On 15 Nov 2002, Yogesh Sharma wrote: > I think debian list has to add some filter on subject and if subject > contains unsubscribe redirect that email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > or else we have add following message in multiple languages. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subje

please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread poczta
people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before you mail on it. thanks ireo

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:16:25PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > this really gets annoying. is the list owner willing and able to filter those dumb messages, and maybe boun

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Horst Pflugstaedt
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: > Are you thick or what? > the last days it seems to me that those unsubscribe-messages more and more become a security-problem (health-risk) to the remaining members of this list... calm down, please. need some valium? :-) Greeti

Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!

2002-11-16 Thread Daniel Stone
[CC finally changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], whoops. Please keep editors@, or just me]. On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:01:23PM -0800, Robert Woodcock scrawled: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:25:22PM -0500, Robert C. wrote: > > The Apache suexec helper is special > > Is "special" the going euphamism for "b

Re: [OT] please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:55:49AM +0100, poczta wrote: > people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from > on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before > you mail on it. thanks or at the very least, If you are bound and determined to address this person's erorr, reply t

Apache/suexec (was Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!)

2002-11-16 Thread Justin Ryan
> Not really, it's a security file: you can't change your area without > recompiling. I can see the use for this: h4x0rs can't just change a > config file and have a completely different suexec area, of their own > choosing. Of course, if they can get write access to said config file they probably

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thorin Oakenshield
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:39:35AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote: > > Why not > > :0: > > * ^Subject: unsubscribe > > * ^X-Mailing-List: > > /dev/null > > > > instead? > > I don't like the idea that my system is deleting emails I have never > seen. Once a month I find the time to check my spam an

RE: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Thomas Horsten
On 15 Nov 2002, Yogesh Sharma wrote: > I think debian list has to add some filter on subject and if subject > contains unsubscribe redirect that email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > or else we have add following message in multiple languages. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subje

please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread poczta
people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before you mail on it. thanks ireo

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:16:25PM -0600, Steve Waterman wrote: > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > this really gets annoying. is the list owner willing and able to filter those dumb messages, and maybe boun

Re: unsubscribe

2002-11-16 Thread Horst Pflugstaedt
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: > Are you thick or what? > the last days it seems to me that those unsubscribe-messages more and more become a security-problem (health-risk) to the remaining members of this list... calm down, please. need some valium? :-) Greetin

Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!

2002-11-16 Thread Daniel Stone
[CC finally changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], whoops. Please keep editors@, or just me]. On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:01:23PM -0800, Robert Woodcock scrawled: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:25:22PM -0500, Robert C. wrote: > > The Apache suexec helper is special > > Is "special" the going euphamism for "b

Re: [OT] please do not ...

2002-11-16 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:55:49AM +0100, poczta wrote: > people, do not respond to 'unsubscribe' messages, 'cause from > on mail it grows to many messages, so think twice before > you mail on it. thanks or at the very least, If you are bound and determined to address this person's erorr, reply t

Apache/suexec (was Re: Debian Apache Packaging - Option 4!)

2002-11-16 Thread Justin Ryan
> Not really, it's a security file: you can't change your area without > recompiling. I can see the use for this: h4x0rs can't just change a > config file and have a completely different suexec area, of their own > choosing. Of course, if they can get write access to said config file they probably