- Original Message -
From: "Crawford Rainwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: A Linux version of system and network monitoring?
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitor
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 07:38:59AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> > monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivoli or
> > HP OpenView, preferably under GPL and free? If so,
> > links and such would
Hi Marcel!
On 30 Apr 2002, at 11:26, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
> Has anyone got any scripts to get usefull per IP accounting info out of
> the net-acct log for a time period or know where i can get one ??
I know about
http://phpipacstats.sourceforge.net/
Which is a really nice Webfrontend fo
-Original Message-
From: Jaan Sarv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Linux version of system and network monitoring?
- Original Message -
From: "Crawford Rainwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 12:46 am, Martin Grape wrote:
> http://www.netsaint.org/ might be what your looking for.
This has been ursurped by Nagios at http://www.nagios.org/ .
I am working on debs for it.
- --
Warren Turkal
Linux User
GPG Fingerprint
-Original Message-
From: Josef Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Net-acct
Hi Marcel!
On 30 Apr 2002, at 11:26, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
> Has anyone got any scripts to get usefull per IP accounting info out
Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
Linux kernel:
"Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
This seems something related to the cramfs filesystem (ramdisk)
but I'm not knowledgeable about it. I would like:
1.- an explanation on why this is shipp
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 04:26:18PM -0600, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network monitoring
> program out there? Similar to Tivoli or HP OpenView, preferably
> under GPL and free? If so, links and such would be great.
Though it specifically says it's n
Does anyone have a nice simple HOWTO on how to add encryption to the
pptpd daemon, so that windows VPN users can connect using encryption?
Preferred methods do NOT include patching things, if possible,
because I'd like to not have to re-patch things every time new
upgrades come out.
Has anyon
Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
have to do is configure it.
From Freshmeat:
PoPToP
About:
PoPToP is a PPTP server for use in PPTP VPN environments. The current
release version supports Windows 95/98/NT/2000 PPTP clients and PPTP
Linux clients. With the relevant patches,
At 8:43 AM -0700 4/30/02, Anne Carasik wrote:
>Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
>have to do is configure it.
>I don't think you should have any patching to do. :) The home page
>for poptop is at http://www.poptop.org.
Not unless the packaged pptpd/ppp has something else,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 12:03:09PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> >I don't think you should have any patching to do. :) The home page
> >for poptop is at http://www.poptop.org.
> Not unless the packaged pptpd/ppp has something else, from the poptop.org
> page:
> # Available PPPD patch allows Wi
You need the mppe-kernel-modul *and* a patch for the pppd.
It would be really nice if there were .deb's
Martin
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 08:43:21AM -0700, Anne Carasik wrote:
> Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
> have to do is configure it.
>
> From Freshmeat:
> PoPToP
>
looks like there's a package for the patch:
kernel-patch-mppe - ppp_mppe module for pppd
xn
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 12:03:09PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> At 8:43 AM -0700 4/30/02, Anne Carasik wrote:
> >Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
> >have to do is configure it.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:54:24AM -0400, "Derek J. Balling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Does anyone have a nice simple HOWTO on how to add encryption to the
> pptpd daemon, so that windows VPN users can connect using encryption?
As a side note: have you considered that using the encryption i
>looks like there's a package for the patch:
>kernel-patch-mppe - ppp_mppe module for pppd
Except that that patch is against 2.4.0
There's a lot of "disjointed pieces", and not all of them seem to be
maintained or kept current:
o pptpd - which seems to (now) not require any special effort
At 6:52 PM +0200 4/30/02, Tim van Erven wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:54:24AM -0400, "Derek J. Balling"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does anyone have a nice simple HOWTO on how to add encryption to the
>> pptpd daemon, so that windows VPN users can connect using encryption?
>
>As a side
yeah, it's a mess. i spent 2 days trying to get poptop working a few
months ago. once i got everything patched and running and could setup a
vpn between pptp-linux and pptpd, i still couldn't get win98 to connect
to pptpd. i gave up and decided next time i'd try to use ipsec with
freeswan.
goo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:24:21PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> >As a side note: have you considered that using the encryption in pptp
> >forces you to store userpasswords in cleartext? For my ISP [1] that was
> >a reason not to use pptp's encryption, especially since MS-CHAPv2
> >contains kno
At 11:23 AM -0700 4/30/02, Anne Carasik wrote:
> > (who would LOVE to move to a _MORE_ secure solution, but is content,
>> for now, to only allow himself and one other to even have accounts on
>> the box with the cleartext passwds)
>
>Ugh.. I'd never be content with cleartext passwords, especia
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> Linux kernel:
> "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
> 1.- an explanation on why this is shipped by default (to add it to the
> "Securing Debian Manual"
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:30:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2.- someone to step up an explain how to disable this behavior
>
> Dont look at it. Or dont install a system.
Funny. However, the kernel used by the installa
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:30:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> > Linux kernel:
> > "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
> > 1.- an explanation on why
#include
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote on Tue Apr 30, 2002 um 03:50:27PM:
> Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> Linux kernel:
>
> "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
This is a default for the initrd's linuxrc. You installed one of our
offic
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> 2.- someone to step up an explain how to disable this behavior
Maybe something like this:
1. In /etc/mkinitrd/mkinitrd.conf, set:
DELAY=0
2. Then regenerate your ramdisk image, for example:
cd /boot
mkinitrd -o initrd.img-2.4.18-k7 /lib/modules/2.4.18-k
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:20:14PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > (whatever this is for). I was quite surprised when I saw this but a user
> > has just mailed me asking for an answer on why does Debian woody ships
>
> Dito. Show me a system with such "problem" after a fresh installation.
>
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 04:26:18PM -0600, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivoli or
> HP OpenView, preferably under GPL and free? If so,
> links and such would be great.
>
I have bee
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:05:27PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:20:14PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> > > (whatever this is for). I was quite surprised when I saw this but a user
> > > has just mailed me asking for an answer on why does Debian wo
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Now that I think of it this might be an issue with self-installed
> kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual, commit the
> changes and close the bug. Of course, woody does *not* install 2.4 kernels
> IIRC.
The default install does no
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Now that I think of it this might be an issue with self-installed
> kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual, commit the
> changes and close the bug. Of course, woody does *not* install 2.4 kernels
> IIRC.
Tha
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:17:00PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > Now that I think of it this might be an issue with self-installed
> > kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual, commit the
> > changes and close the bug. Of course, wood
On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 03:50:27PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> Linux kernel:
>
> "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
>
> This seems something related to the cramfs filesystem (ramdisk)
> b
#include
Luca Filipozzi wrote on Tue Apr 30, 2002 um 02:01:57PM:
> > a look at the dists/woody/main/disks-i386/current directory in the
> > Debian archives.
>
> And the stock kernel images available in woody include 2.4 kernels.
> These, also, have an initrd that offers a root shell, I believ
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:23:06PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> It is there as part of the installer to make like easier
> for those wishing to do things that the installer does not
> support by default. It has nothing whatsoever to do with
> cramfs or the kernel.
This is what I was thinking at
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:23:06PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> It is there as part of the installer to make like easier
> for those wishing to do things that the installer does not
> support by default. It has nothing whatsoever to do with
> cramfs or the kernel.
you're just wrong. the 2.4 ker
Where might one find documentation on this bf2.4 kernel?
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > Now that I think of it this might be an issue with
> self-installed
> > kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual,
> commit the
> > changes and close the bug. Of course, wo
Use the source, Luke.
/usr/share/initrd-tools/linuxrc is:
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # $Id: linuxrc,v 1.3 2002/01/25 12:46:20 herbert Exp $
>
> PATH=/sbin:/bin
>
> . /linuxrc.conf
>
> if [ $DELAY -gt 0 ]; then
> echo "Waiting for $DELAY seconds, press ENTER to obtain a
> shell."
>
> t
It is also important to remember not to chown log files. If you do this you
could run into problems. The proccess that writes the file may not be able
too.
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: world readable log files and /etc/ files
D
Has anyone got any scripts to get usefull per IP accounting info out of
the net-acct log for a time period or know where i can get one ??
Cheers
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivoli or
> HP OpenView, preferably under GPL and free? If so,
> links and such would be great.
netsaint, mon. tkined is useful as well (part of scotty now iirc)
29 Apr 2002, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivoli or
> HP OpenView, preferably under GPL and free? If so,
> links and such would be great.
>
> This would be used to monitor a remote system
Crawford Rainwater wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivoli or
> HP OpenView, preferably under GPL and free? If so,
> links and such would be great.
>
> This would be used to monitor a remote system being
> "up
http://www.netsaint.org/ is probably what you're looking for.
something like...
apt-cache search network monitor
might unveil a few other candidates...
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 18:26, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitoring program ou
- Original Message -
From: "Crawford Rainwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: A Linux version of system and network monitoring?
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 07:38:59AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> > monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivoli or
> > HP OpenView, preferably under GPL and free? If so,
> > links and such would
Hi Marcel!
On 30 Apr 2002, at 11:26, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
> Has anyone got any scripts to get usefull per IP accounting info out of
> the net-acct log for a time period or know where i can get one ??
I know about
http://phpipacstats.sourceforge.net/
Which is a really nice Webfrontend for
-Original Message-
From: Jaan Sarv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:21 AM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A Linux version of system and network monitoring?
- Original Message -
From: "Crawford Rainwater"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 12:46 am, Martin Grape wrote:
> http://www.netsaint.org/ might be what your looking for.
This has been ursurped by Nagios at http://www.nagios.org/ .
I am working on debs for it.
- --
Warren Turkal
Linux User
GPG Fingerprint:
-Original Message-
From: Josef Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:20 AM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Net-acct
Hi Marcel!
On 30 Apr 2002, at 11:26, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
> Has anyone got any scripts to get usefull per IP account
Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
Linux kernel:
"Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
This seems something related to the cramfs filesystem (ramdisk)
but I'm not knowledgeable about it. I would like:
1.- an explanation on why this is shippe
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> Linux kernel:
> "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
> 1.- an explanation on why this is shipped by default (to add it to the
> "Securing Debian Manual"
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 04:26:18PM -0600, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network monitoring
> program out there? Similar to Tivoli or HP OpenView, preferably
> under GPL and free? If so, links and such would be great.
Though it specifically says it's no
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:30:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2.- someone to step up an explain how to disable this behavior
>
> Dont look at it. Or dont install a system.
Funny. However, the kernel used by the installat
Does anyone have a nice simple HOWTO on how to add encryption to the
pptpd daemon, so that windows VPN users can connect using encryption?
Preferred methods do NOT include patching things, if possible,
because I'd like to not have to re-patch things every time new
upgrades come out.
Has anyon
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:30:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> > Linux kernel:
> > "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
> > 1.- an explanation on why
#include
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote on Tue Apr 30, 2002 um 03:50:27PM:
> Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> Linux kernel:
>
> "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
This is a default for the initrd's linuxrc. You installed one of our
offici
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> 2.- someone to step up an explain how to disable this behavior
Maybe something like this:
1. In /etc/mkinitrd/mkinitrd.conf, set:
DELAY=0
2. Then regenerate your ramdisk image, for example:
cd /boot
mkinitrd -o initrd.img-2.4.18-k7 /lib/modules/2.4.18-k7
Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
have to do is configure it.
From Freshmeat:
PoPToP
About:
PoPToP is a PPTP server for use in PPTP VPN environments. The current
release version supports Windows 95/98/NT/2000 PPTP clients and PPTP
Linux clients. With the relevant patches,
At 8:43 AM -0700 4/30/02, Anne Carasik wrote:
Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
have to do is configure it.
I don't think you should have any patching to do. :) The home page
for poptop is at http://www.poptop.org.
Not unless the packaged pptpd/ppp has something else,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:20:14PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > (whatever this is for). I was quite surprised when I saw this but a user
> > has just mailed me asking for an answer on why does Debian woody ships
>
> Dito. Show me a system with such "problem" after a fresh installation.
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 12:03:09PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> >I don't think you should have any patching to do. :) The home page
> >for poptop is at http://www.poptop.org.
> Not unless the packaged pptpd/ppp has something else, from the poptop.org
> page:
> # Available PPPD patch allows Win
You need the mppe-kernel-modul *and* a patch for the pppd.
It would be really nice if there were .deb's
Martin
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 08:43:21AM -0700, Anne Carasik wrote:
> Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
> have to do is configure it.
>
> From Freshmeat:
> PoPToP
>
looks like there's a package for the patch:
kernel-patch-mppe - ppp_mppe module for pppd
xn
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 12:03:09PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> At 8:43 AM -0700 4/30/02, Anne Carasik wrote:
> >Last time I checked, PPTP comes with encryption. All you
> >have to do is configure it.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:54:24AM -0400, "Derek J. Balling" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a nice simple HOWTO on how to add encryption to the
> pptpd daemon, so that windows VPN users can connect using encryption?
As a side note: have you considered that using the encryption in
looks like there's a package for the patch:
kernel-patch-mppe - ppp_mppe module for pppd
Except that that patch is against 2.4.0
There's a lot of "disjointed pieces", and not all of them seem to be
maintained or kept current:
o pptpd - which seems to (now) not require any special effort
At 6:52 PM +0200 4/30/02, Tim van Erven wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:54:24AM -0400, "Derek J. Balling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have a nice simple HOWTO on how to add encryption to the
pptpd daemon, so that windows VPN users can connect using encryption?
As a side note: ha
yeah, it's a mess. i spent 2 days trying to get poptop working a few
months ago. once i got everything patched and running and could setup a
vpn between pptp-linux and pptpd, i still couldn't get win98 to connect
to pptpd. i gave up and decided next time i'd try to use ipsec with
freeswan.
good
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:24:21PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> >As a side note: have you considered that using the encryption in pptp
> >forces you to store userpasswords in cleartext? For my ISP [1] that was
> >a reason not to use pptp's encryption, especially since MS-CHAPv2
> >contains know
At 11:23 AM -0700 4/30/02, Anne Carasik wrote:
> (who would LOVE to move to a _MORE_ secure solution, but is content,
for now, to only allow himself and one other to even have accounts on
the box with the cleartext passwds)
Ugh.. I'd never be content with cleartext passwords, especially giv
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 04:26:18PM -0600, Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone know of a Linux based system and network
> monitoring program out there? Similar to Tivoli or
> HP OpenView, preferably under GPL and free? If so,
> links and such would be great.
>
I have been
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:05:27PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:20:14PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> > > (whatever this is for). I was quite surprised when I saw this but a user
> > > has just mailed me asking for an answer on why does Debian woo
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Now that I think of it this might be an issue with self-installed
> kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual, commit the
> changes and close the bug. Of course, woody does *not* install 2.4 kernels
> IIRC.
The default install does not
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Now that I think of it this might be an issue with self-installed
> kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual, commit the
> changes and close the bug. Of course, woody does *not* install 2.4 kernels
> IIRC.
That
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:17:00PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > Now that I think of it this might be an issue with self-installed
> > kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual, commit the
> > changes and close the bug. Of course, woody
On Tue Apr 30, 2002 at 03:50:27PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Culd someone explain why is there a root shell prompt for the
> Linux kernel:
>
> "Press ENTER to obtain a shell" (waits 5 seconds)
>
> This seems something related to the cramfs filesystem (ramdisk)
> bu
#include
Luca Filipozzi wrote on Tue Apr 30, 2002 um 02:01:57PM:
> > a look at the dists/woody/main/disks-i386/current directory in the
> > Debian archives.
>
> And the stock kernel images available in woody include 2.4 kernels.
> These, also, have an initrd that offers a root shell, I believe
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:23:06PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> It is there as part of the installer to make like easier
> for those wishing to do things that the installer does not
> support by default. It has nothing whatsoever to do with
> cramfs or the kernel.
This is what I was thinking at
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:23:06PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> It is there as part of the installer to make like easier
> for those wishing to do things that the installer does not
> support by default. It has nothing whatsoever to do with
> cramfs or the kernel.
you're just wrong. the 2.4 kern
Where might one find documentation on this bf2.4 kernel?
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > Now that I think of it this might be an issue with
> self-installed
> > kernels. I'm going to document this behavior in the Manual,
> commit the
> > changes and close the bug. Of course, woo
79 matches
Mail list logo
