tions) to bump the translation check headers in
> the second commit.
Okay thanks for pointing that out, was surely not the intention to
cause more work.
> > Once bullseye will be released the example sources.list entry in
> > https://www.debian.org/security/#keeping-secure will
o have to bump the
translation check header. If you first commit the English change and
then commit the translation changes, you can use ./smart_change.pl
(see --help for instructions) to bump the translation check headers in
the second commit.
> Once bullseye will be released the example sou
>
> > https://wiki.debian.org/NewInBullseye
> > and
> > https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/errata
> >
> > disagree about the bullseye-security entry in sources.list. Not to
> > mention that the deb-src line is missing on both.
>
>
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 04:52:26PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Besides, I believe end users are not supposed to know deb-src line for
> security repos.
sure, they do! and of course we provide source for our security updates!
> Adding such info provides zero benefit except for confusing
> users.
eases/bullseye/errata
>
> disagree about the bullseye-security entry in sources.list. Not to
> mention that the deb-src line is missing on both.
TL;DR: Both will work:
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
deb http://security.debian.org/ bullseye-security main
Be
Thanks Thijs, Russ and Dan.
I appreciate the insight.
John
>>
>> Is the approach I outlined the "best" way to maintain the security and
>> stability of these box's or should I really be using the main
>> repositories as well?
>
> We maintain local mirrors of the main and security repos for the
the
> applications
> running on the servers. After I build a box and get my applications
> tweaked I usually comment out everything except the security entries
> like so:
>
> cat /etc/apt/sources.list
>
> #deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main
> #deb-src h
john writes:
> deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib
>
> The recent key-change forced me to use the main stable repos to get
> the new keys (e.g apt-get install debian-archive-keyring )
> . and got me thinking...
Hi John,
On moandei 25 Maaie 2009, john wrote:
> The recent key-change forced me to use the main stable repos to get
> the new keys (e.g apt-get install debian-archive-keyring )
> . and got me thinking...
>
> Is the approach I outlined the "best" way to maintain the security and
> stability of th
tweaked I usually comment out everything except the security entries
like so:
cat /etc/apt/sources.list
#deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main
#deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main
deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian
nope, there is no difference now, after the update. if it
was before i can not tell anymore because i have updated all my hosts...
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:46:37 +0100
Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a difference in the output of "apt-cache policy php4" when you
> have a 'sarge
Is there a difference in the output of "apt-cache policy php4" when you
have a 'sarge' and a 'stable' line?
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
hi
i run sarge.
there were the php4 (and more) security updates recently.
#---
my /etc/apt/sources.list contains this line:
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
--
now when i make:
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
it will make the courier upgrade but not the php4
mend that, on occasion a package makes it into
> proposed-updates that really should not be installed on a potato reason
> for some reason.
Uhm, I suggested to *drop* that line from one's sources.list. Surely,
you would recommend that if packages in proposed-updates really should
not be
-Original Message-
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:05:10 +0200
Subject: Re: sources.list for potato
> Previously Pavel Minev Penev wrote:
> > And there is no
> >
> > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-security unstable/
Previously Pavel Minev Penev wrote:
> And there is no
>
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-security unstable/updates main
> contrib non-free
>
> , is it?
No, and there never will be.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
an.org/debian-security potato/updates main contrib
> > non-free
> >
> >
> > is all I need on my sources.list for potato, right?
> >
> > And when I move to woody someday, just s/potato/woody/, correct?
>
> For a truly stable Debian system, drop
>
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > For a truly stable Debian system, drop
> > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/
>
> I wouldn't recommend that, on occasion a package makes it into
> proposed-updates that really should not be install
Previously Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> For a truly stable Debian system, drop
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/
I wouldn't recommend that, on occasion a package makes it into
proposed-updates that really should not be installed on a potato reason
for some rea
non-US is being phased out.
>
> I've seen way too many packages that take too long to get into stable when
> there's security holes.
That's why you have
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
at the top of your /etc/apt/sources.list, not?
--
Olaf Meeuwisse
Geoff Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oops! I confused the "crypto in main" issue with non-US being phased
> > out. Of course, the patented bits will stay in non-US so it will not
> > disappear in the foreseeable future.
>
> What is the 'cypto in main' issue? (Or better, have you got
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:36, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Geoff Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:22, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > > (wait for official release updates) and then just s/potato/stable/g.
> > > Note that non-US is being phased out.
> >
> > Can you point me to t
Geoff Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:22, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > (wait for official release updates) and then just s/potato/stable/g.
> > Note that non-US is being phased out.
>
> Can you point me to the mail-archive thread that discusses this?(I haven't
> bee
> For a truly stable Debian system, drop
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/
>
> (wait for official release updates) and then just s/potato/stable/g.
> Note that non-US is being phased out.
I've seen way too many packages that take too long to get into stable
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:22, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> (wait for official release updates) and then just s/potato/stable/g.
> Note that non-US is being phased out.
Can you point me to the mail-archive thread that discusses this?(I haven't
been following debian lists for very long).
Cheers
Geo
potato/non-US main contrib
> non-free
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-security potato/updates main contrib
> non-free
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security potato/updates main contrib
> non-free
>
>
> is all I need on my sources.list for potato, right
/updates main contrib
non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security potato/updates main contrib
non-free
is all I need on my sources.list for potato, right?
And when I move to woody someday, just s/potato/woody/, correct?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:51:13PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> thanks for your help.
> basicaly, the following three line is good enough to keep my potato debian
> up to date?
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
> (#for standard us debian)
> deb http://non-
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:51:13PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> thanks for your help.
> basicaly, the following three line is good enough to keep my potato debian
> up to date?
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
> (#for standard us debian)
> deb http://non
, 2001 4:06 PM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Two questions about /etc/apt/sources.list
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:43:48PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Q1:
> is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/
n't get non-us security updates by putting
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
in sources.list because that is the same as the line
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
which I presume you already have. I think (and I hope somebody will
Hi,
Q1:
is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the same thing?
Q2: do i also need to have a line saying
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
contrib non-free
for non-us update?
thanks
Mo
23, 2001 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Two questions about /etc/apt/sources.list
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:43:48PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Q1:
> is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the s
n't get non-us security updates by putting
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
in sources.list because that is the same as the line
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
which I presume you already have. I think (and I hope somebody will
Hi,
Q1:
is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the same thing?
Q2: do i also need to have a line saying
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
contrib non-free
for non-us update?
thanks
Mo
--
To UNSUBSC
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>se
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>se
:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> >
> > >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> > >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
> >
> > Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure
> installation:
&
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:24:16PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
>iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the
>security source until I figure out a better way.
It is possible to run kernel 2.4.x (with iptables) on a p
At 01:24 PM 8/21/2001 -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>
> >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> >system running woody, that includes th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Jeff" == Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
Jeff> iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the security
Jeff> source until I figure out a better way.
Adrian Bun
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>
> >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
>
> Woody would be my last ch
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
>system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure installation:
* it gets no packages
:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> >
> > >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> > >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
> >
> > Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure
> installation:
&
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:24:16PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
>iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the
>security source until I figure out a better way.
It is possible to run kernel 2.4.x (with iptables) on a
At 01:24 PM 8/21/2001 -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> >
> > >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> > >system running woody, t
* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>security updates caus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Jeff" == Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
Jeff> iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the security
Jeff> source until I figure out a better way.
Adrian Bu
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy issues that I couldn't
recover from and made my syst
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>
> >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
>
> Woody would be my last ch
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
>system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure installation:
* it gets no packages
* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>security updates ca
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy issues that I couldn't
recover from and m
acomo Mulas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: security debian
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: sources.list
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
>
> > I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> > Debian ( almost all potato
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
> I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
> and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
> source. then I can apt-get up
acomo Mulas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: security debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: sources.list
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
>
> > I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> &g
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
> I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
> and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
> source. then I can apt-get u
Duane Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
> and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
> source. then I can apt-get up
Duane Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
> and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
> source. then I can apt-get u
-get dist-upgrade ; done, on onebox, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxenwithout actually mirroring the whole debian site.I know it's configurable - I don't know how.I read the man for sources.list, but I don't know how to set up thewebserver to
en I can apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade ; done, on onebox, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxenwithout actually mirroring the whole debian site.I know it's configurable - I don't know how.I read the man for sources.list, but I don't k
the boxes as a apt-get
> > source. then I can apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade ; done, on one
> > box, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxen
> > without actually mirroring the whole debian site.
> >
> > I know it's confi
one of the boxes as a apt-get
> > source. then I can apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade ; done, on one
> > box, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxen
> > without actually mirroring the whole debian site.
> >
> > I know it's confi
; apt-get dist-upgrade ; done, on one
> box, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxen
> without actually mirroring the whole debian site.
>
> I know it's configurable - I don't know how.
> I read the man for sources.list, but I don'
Duane Powers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
> and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
> source. then I can apt-get upd
, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxen
without actually mirroring the whole debian site.
I know it's configurable - I don't know how.
I read the man for sources.list, but I don't know how to set up the
webserver to understand the following;
; apt-get dist-upgrade ; done, on one
> box, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxen
> without actually mirroring the whole debian site.
>
> I know it's configurable - I don't know how.
> I read the man for sources.list, but I don'
Duane Powers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
> Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
> and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
> source. then I can apt-get up
, and save all the .deb's then use those .deb's for the other boxen
without actually mirroring the whole debian site.
I know it's configurable - I don't know how.
I read the man for sources.list, but I don't know how to set up the
webserver to understand the following;
I ran apt-setup and it automatically added my local mirrors. I'm not sure if
it wipes your previous sources.list though...
GBY
I ran apt-setup and it automatically added my local mirrors. I'm not sure if
it wipes your previous sources.list though...
GBY
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have recently been to the www.debian.org looking for the latest sites to
add to my sources.list file. I could not find them even though I know that I
have seen them there before. Could anyone give me a hand and let me know
what entries to include there. I am currently using:
#STABLE
deb http
I have recently been to the www.debian.org looking for the latest sites to
add to my sources.list file. I could not find them even though I know that I
have seen them there before. Could anyone give me a hand and let me know
what entries to include there. I am currently using:
#STABLE
deb http
73 matches
Mail list logo
