Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread J . Reilink
- Original message - On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Bencsath Boldizsar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more > than half year old in 'testing' release? > I already know one guy wi

Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread J . Reilink
- Original message - On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Bencsath Boldizsar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more > than half year old in 'testing' release? > I already know one guy wi

Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:47:36PM +0200, Boldizsar BENCSATH wrote: > What about something like this 5-minutes-change?: > > Template: samba/security_warning > Type: boolean > Default: false > Description: Warning! Serious Warning! > This version of samba contains remotely exploitable SERIOUS > v

Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread Boldizsar BENCSATH
What about something like this 5-minutes-change?: Template: samba/security_warning Type: boolean Default: false Description: Warning! Serious Warning! This version of samba contains remotely exploitable SERIOUS vulnerabilities! If you continue the install You will be definetly target of CRACKING

Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:39:29AM +0200, Bencsath Boldizsar wrote: > Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more than > half year old in 'testing' release? > I already know one guy with a 1 week old 'testing' debian hacked through > samba. (I know, it's -12.3 on security

Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:47:36PM +0200, Boldizsar BENCSATH wrote: > What about something like this 5-minutes-change?: > > Template: samba/security_warning > Type: boolean > Default: false > Description: Warning! Serious Warning! > This version of samba contains remotely exploitable SERIOUS > v

Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread Boldizsar BENCSATH
What about something like this 5-minutes-change?: Template: samba/security_warning Type: boolean Default: false Description: Warning! Serious Warning! This version of samba contains remotely exploitable SERIOUS vulnerabilities! If you continue the install You will be definetly target of CRACKING

Re: samba woody

2003-07-01 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:39:29AM +0200, Bencsath Boldizsar wrote: > Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more than > half year old in 'testing' release? > I already know one guy with a 1 week old 'testing' debian hacked through > samba. (I know, it's -12.3 on security

samba woody

2003-06-30 Thread Bencsath Boldizsar
Hi, Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more than half year old in 'testing' release? I already know one guy with a 1 week old 'testing' debian hacked through samba. (I know, it's -12.3 on security for stable, and samba is not secure at all, but I think this one needs

samba woody

2003-06-30 Thread Bencsath Boldizsar
Hi, Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more than half year old in 'testing' release? I already know one guy with a 1 week old 'testing' debian hacked through samba. (I know, it's -12.3 on security for stable, and samba is not secure at all, but I think this one needs