On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:39:29AM +0200, Bencsath Boldizsar wrote: > Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more than > half year old in 'testing' release? > I already know one guy with a 1 week old 'testing' debian hacked through > samba. (I know, it's -12.3 on security for stable, and samba is not secure at > all, but I think this one needs an upgrade ASAP...)
I am pleased to hear of your interest in helping to improve Debian testing. Here are some links to get you started in your efforts to help get a new version of samba into testing: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=samba&ver=3.0.0beta1-1&arch=arm&stamp=1055147113&file=log&as=raw http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=slapd&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=acl&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious All of those things need to be fixed in order to get a new samba into testing. -- - mdz
