nope, there is no difference now, after the update. if it
was before i can not tell anymore because i have updated all my hosts...
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:46:37 +0100
Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a difference in the output of "apt-cache policy php4" when you
> have a 'sarge
Is there a difference in the output of "apt-cache policy php4" when you
have a 'sarge' and a 'stable' line?
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
hi
i run sarge.
there were the php4 (and more) security updates recently.
#---
my /etc/apt/sources.list contains this line:
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
--
now when i make:
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
it will make the courier upgrade but not the php4
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:51:13PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> thanks for your help.
> basicaly, the following three line is good enough to keep my potato debian
> up to date?
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
> (#for standard us debian)
> deb http://non-
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:51:13PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> thanks for your help.
> basicaly, the following three line is good enough to keep my potato debian
> up to date?
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
> (#for standard us debian)
> deb http://non
, 2001 4:06 PM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Two questions about /etc/apt/sources.list
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:43:48PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Q1:
> is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:43:48PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Q1:
> is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the same thing?
I'm pretty sure they are. I can't seem to check as ftp won't let me ls
currently (I think that machine
Hi,
Q1:
is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the same thing?
Q2: do i also need to have a line saying
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
contrib non-free
for non-us update?
thanks
Mo
23, 2001 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Two questions about /etc/apt/sources.list
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:43:48PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Q1:
> is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the s
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:43:48PM +0800, Zhenguang Mo (163) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Q1:
> is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the same thing?
I'm pretty sure they are. I can't seem to check as ftp won't let me ls
currently (I think that machin
Hi,
Q1:
is http://security.debian.org/dists/ and
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/ the same thing?
Q2: do i also need to have a line saying
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main
contrib non-free
for non-us update?
thanks
Mo
--
To UNSUBSC
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>security updates cause dependancy
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>security updates cause dependanc
Greetings,
A better solution might be to install Potato, then recompile the src debs from
woody for the few packages that you actually need.
G'day,
sjames
Quoting Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppo
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:24:16PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
>iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the
>security source until I figure out a better way.
It is possible to run kernel 2.4.x (with iptables) on a p
At 01:24 PM 8/21/2001 -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>
> >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
>
> Woo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Jeff" == Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
Jeff> iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the security
Jeff> source until I figure out a better way.
Adrian Bun
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>
> >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
>
> Woody would be my last choice for a automagically se
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
>system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure installation:
* it gets no packages of any k
Greetings,
A better solution might be to install Potato, then recompile the src debs from woody
for the few packages that you actually need.
G'day,
sjames
Quoting Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Copp
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:24:16PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
>iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the
>security source until I figure out a better way.
It is possible to run kernel 2.4.x (with iptables) on a
At 01:24 PM 8/21/2001 -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> >
> > >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> > >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>security updates cause dependancy issues that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Jeff" == Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff>I feel a bit stuck with woody though, since I want to use
Jeff> iptables instead of ipchains. I think I'll remove the security
Jeff> source until I figure out a better way.
Adrian Bu
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy issues that I couldn't
recover from and made my system unbootable,
Mike Renfro, 2001-Aug-21 14:40 -0500:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>
> >Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
> >system running woody, that includes the security updates?
>
> Woody would be my last choice for a automagically s
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:36:02AM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for a
>system running woody, that includes the security updates?
Woody would be my last choice for a automagically secure installation:
* it gets no packages of any
* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus:
>Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
>a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
>recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
>security updates cause dependancy issues that I
Can I get a few recommendations on the proper sources.list for
a system running woody, that includes the security updates? I
recently did an apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and the
security updates cause dependancy issues that I couldn't
recover from and made my system unbootable
29 matches
Mail list logo
