Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:32:50PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > How does the security team feel about having to rebuild iceape, > iceweasel, icedove (you forgot to file a bug on icedove), OOo and enchant > if there happens to be a security bug in hunspell ? In general having multiple packages ne

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Davide Prina
Rene Engelhard wrote: Davide Prina wrote: MySpell is obsolete. Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible. probably not so full backwards compatibility.

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do. There's hunspell dictionaries in Debian which have to conflict > against all mozillas... I fail to see why. Are the hunspell dictionaries in /usr/share/myspell/dicts or what ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Davide Prina wrote: > > MySpell is obsolete. > > Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell > > retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage > > of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible. > > probably not so full backwards compatibility. Proo

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, e

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Davide Prina
Rene Engelhard wrote: > MySpell is obsolete. > Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell > retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage > of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible. probably not so full backwards compatibility. > [ The Problem i

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-09 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that > > > hunspell dictionar

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that > > hunspell dictionaries > > then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security > > team knows

Re: Bug#401969: please build using hunspell

2006-12-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell > dictionaries > then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security team > knows > that mozilla needs to be reb