On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 at 01:34:12PM +0200, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote:
> avoid more than one connection from the same ip
The way I took his idea was that you had 1,000 different clients connection to
thousands of different server. One client not connecting to any given server
more than once...
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 at 01:34:12PM +0200, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote:
> avoid more than one connection from the same ip
The way I took his idea was that you had 1,000 different clients connection to
thousands of different server. One client not connecting to any given server
more than once...
Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm, now which one would that be for County Down, Northern Ireland?
Depends on who you can afford, of course.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
cartridge. We should go metric every inch of the way.
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:59:47PM -0500, Mike Barushok wrote:
> My understanding of this, just from some online study, is
> that what they are contemplating doing at this time would
> be along the lines of:
I was under the impression they were already doing things
like that; also that they are d
--- Begin Message ---
Hmmm, now which one would that be for County Down, Northern Ireland?
I doubt these people will even be aware of where their
target for criminal forced entry is, nor would they
care if they did.
Of course, "In the best of all possible worlds" they'd give
the script kiddies a
list of ip's from which media hackers are known to be
operating so we can just block them entirely. [With some decay
time for IP#s in known DHCP address blocks of course...]
--- End Message ---
Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm, now which one would that be for County Down, Northern Ireland?
Depends on who you can afford, of course.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
cartridge. We should go metric every inch of the way.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:59:47PM -0500, Mike Barushok wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> > > I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> > > this sort of attack before it gets to the home u
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:59:47PM -0500, Mike Barushok wrote:
> My understanding of this, just from some online study, is
> that what they are contemplating doing at this time would
> be along the lines of:
I was under the impression they were already doing things
like that; also that they are
--- Begin Message ---
Hmmm, now which one would that be for County Down, Northern Ireland?
I doubt these people will even be aware of where their
target for criminal forced entry is, nor would they
care if they did.
Of course, "In the best of all possible worlds" they'd give
the script kiddies a
up
a list of ip's from which media hackers are known to be
operating so we can just block them entirely. [With some decay
time for IP#s in known DHCP address blocks of course...]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 10:59:47PM -0500, Mike Barushok wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> > > I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> > > this sort of attack before it gets to the home
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> > I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> > this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
> > http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
>
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> > I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> > this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
> > http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
> http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
>
it depends on the attack: they say they want the
"Congres
On Sat, 28 Sep 2001 at 10:19 AM, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
>> I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
>> this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
>>
>> http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#0
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
> http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
>
it depends on the attack: they say they want the
"Congre
On Sat, 28 Sep 2001 at 10:19 AM, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
>> I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
>> this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
>>
>> http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 13:19:44 -0400
Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> > I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> > this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
> >
> > http://www.the-dailyrant.c
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
>
> http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
>
> I think it is especially important to those of us
> wh
I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
I think it is especially important to those of us
who are not under US law, living in places where such
activity would not
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 13:19:44 -0400
Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> > I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> > this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
> >
> > http://www.the-dailyrant.
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 at 05:36:06PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
> this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
>
> http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
>
> I think it is especially important to those of us
> w
I'm curious if anyone has thought about ways of blocking
this sort of attack before it gets to the home user?
http://www.the-dailyrant.com/archives/000855.html#000855
I think it is especially important to those of us
who are not under US law, living in places where such
activity would no
24 matches
Mail list logo
