On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 17:50:05 -0500, Herbert Ho wrote:
> how about encrypted loopback? just need the crypto/int'l patch for the
> kernel. no other software. but then again it doesn't use gpg
That's not a disadvantage, as encrypted filesystems are a different area
(protect against differen
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 17:50:05 -0500, Herbert Ho wrote:
> how about encrypted loopback? just need the crypto/int'l patch for the
> kernel. no other software. but then again it doesn't use gpg
That's not a disadvantage, as encrypted filesystems are a different area
(protect against differe
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
> time reada
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
> time read
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> > It seems to work for me, and the .swp file is _encrypted_, no
> > need to disable them.
>
> The .swp file is definitely not encrypted. Worse, it's not possible to
>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> > It seems to work for me, and the .swp file is _encrypted_, no
> > need to disable them.
>
> The .swp file is definitely not encrypted. Worse, it's not possible to
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> It seems to work for me, and the .swp file is _encrypted_, no
> need to disable them.
The .swp file is definitely not encrypted. Worse, it's not possible to
disable using a swapfile when a vim session is already started:
:set uc=0 as
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Could somebody more familiar with vim than me please tell me
> (us) wheter this writes anything unencrypted onto disk? If not,
> shall I file a wishlist bug against vim-rt to include this?
Is your swap file (not VIM's, the OS') in an encripted partition? O
Hello.
I've played a bit with autocommands in vim (the first time ever
I looked at them), and came up with this (shamelessly stolen
from the default vimrc, there it handles *.bz2):
augroup encrypted
au!
autocmd BufReadPre,FileReadPre*.gpg set bin
autocmd BufReadPre,FileReadPr
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> It seems to work for me, and the .swp file is _encrypted_, no
> need to disable them.
The .swp file is definitely not encrypted. Worse, it's not possible to
disable using a swapfile when a vim session is already started:
:set uc=0 as
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Could somebody more familiar with vim than me please tell me
> (us) wheter this writes anything unencrypted onto disk? If not,
> shall I file a wishlist bug against vim-rt to include this?
Is your swap file (not VIM's, the OS') in an encripted partition?
Thanks all for the overwhelming response!
I'll probably try cfs in the near future, as it seems a nice and elegant
solution and it was recommended by a lot of people. But for a quick
start, I'll use the vim auto commands, because I'm already used to vim
and because it was so easy to setup (similar
Hello.
I've played a bit with autocommands in vim (the first time ever
I looked at them), and came up with this (shamelessly stolen
from the default vimrc, there it handles *.bz2):
augroup encrypted
au!
autocmd BufReadPre,FileReadPre*.gpg set bin
autocmd BufReadPre,FileReadP
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:17:40PM +0200, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> > just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, b
* Wouter Hanegraaff
| Is something like this available?
$apt-cache show crypt++el
Package: crypt++el
Version: 2.87-2
Priority: extra
Section: editors
Maintainer: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: emacsen
Recommends: mailcrypt
Architecture: all
FileName: dists/potato/main/binary-all/e
Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
> time readable unencrypted (after saving i
Thanks all for the overwhelming response!
I'll probably try cfs in the near future, as it seems a nice and elegant
solution and it was recommended by a lot of people. But for a quick
start, I'll use the vim auto commands, because I'm already used to vim
and because it was so easy to setup (simila
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:17:40PM +0200, Philipp Schulte wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> > just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original,
* Wouter Hanegraaff
| Is something like this available?
$apt-cache show crypt++el
Package: crypt++el
Version: 2.87-2
Priority: extra
Section: editors
Maintainer: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: emacsen
Recommends: mailcrypt
Architecture: all
FileName: dists/potato/main/binary-all/
Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
> time readable unencrypted (after saving
how about encrypted loopback? just need the crypto/int'l patch for
the kernel. no other software. but then again it doesn't use gpg
there's a howto for it on linuxdoc.org.
herb
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would like
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
See also PPDD:
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~alatham/ppdd.html
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
> ti
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
> ti
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
>
how about encrypted loopback? just need the crypto/int'l patch for
the kernel. no other software. but then again it doesn't use gpg
there's a howto for it on linuxdoc.org.
herb
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would lik
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
See also PPDD:
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~alatham/ppdd.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi,
I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
time readable unencrypted (after saving in the editor), and forgetting
to turn of
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some files that I would like to store encrypted. Of course I can
> just type them in, encrypt them using gpg and delete the original, but
> that seems to be a bit of a kludge. It would mean the file is at some
> t
29 matches
Mail list logo
