On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Jiri 'Ghormoon' Novak wrote:
> maybe force moderator review for mails with only unsubscribe (and maybe
> quoted message) in reply? I know, more work for mods, but less spam at
> least.
IIRC that is already in place but people keep coming up with novel misspellings.
Hi,
I'd vote against, you'll annoy the ones that actually have something to
say about it. You really don't wanna unsubscribe instead of discussing
the topic :)
maybe force moderator review for mails with only unsubscribe (and maybe
quoted message) in reply? I know, more work for mods, but less sp
Hi all,
what about pointing reply-to to address that will automatically unsubscribe?
Most of replies are either unsubscribe attempts or misconfigured vacation
autoresponders.
I know it maybe pretty harsh, but will do away with trolls ;)
--
Regards
Vladislav Kurz
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> I'm wondering why the body of the email doesn't include instructions on how
> to unsubscribe?
Because of DMARC and other message-body signing anti-spam measures.
The headers of every single message we send do include instructions on
how to unsubscribe,
ation.
-Original message-
From: Emiliano del Peon
Sent: Wednesday 2nd March 2016 12:22
To: Andrew Vaughan
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org; listmas...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Changing the "Reply-To:" for debian-security-announce
Or it could be add just as a signat
Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> I'm wondering why the body of the email doesn't include instructions on how
> to unsubscribe? Most modern email clients
[...]
> Just adding "To unsubscribe email:debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with the subject unsubscribe" at the bottom of every email might
Or it could be add just as a signature to the mail. Like:
Content
More content
_
To unsubscribe send an email with subject: "Unsubsribe" to
debian-secur...@lists.debia.org
I think this clearly separates the content of the message
I'm wondering why the body of the email doesn't include instructions on how
to unsubscribe? Most modern email clients will recognise http and
email addresses
and make them clickable even in plain text messages. I realise that adds noise
to every message, but people are good at skimming past irrel
Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Because people expect that they can answer a DSA.
Okay, but what's the point? If someone has something valuable to say in
response to a DSA:
1) he can find the debian-security list;
2) if he replies to the -announce list and gets a bounce because the
Reply-To a
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016, Grond wrote:
> I'll second this motion.
>
> A good proportion of the traffic I get from debian-security
> is simply silly people trying to unsubscribe themselves from
> debian-security-announce by replying to DSAs.
>
> And while most of them do not respond with empty threats
I'll second this motion.
A good proportion of the traffic I get from debian-security
is simply silly people trying to unsubscribe themselves from
debian-security-announce by replying to DSAs.
And while most of them do not respond with empty threats of spam,
the policy of setting the "Reply-To" ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
