it did help with the proftpd exploit
http://webservsec.blogspot.co.at/2011/01/grsecurity-vs-proftpd-exploit.html
but i haven't tried it with kernel exploits
the video isn't online anymore but the screenshot should speak for itself
2015-01-30 7:40 GMT+01:00 Marco Galicia :
> It would be interest
Hi
I finished the discussed mod_perl module and published it on CPAN.
It's name is Apache::AutoLogin
Thanks again for the input from everyone.
Cheers
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 01:56:53PM +0200, Marcel Weber wrote:
No, it doesn't mean that. Current browsers will cache the password, AFAIK
until the end of the session by default, and forever if you enable the
option "Remember this password" or similar.
I k
Hi all
Well, I figured out the problem, why my module hanged... It was a
programming fault... Well in that case, I do not need any md5 checksum
at all...
Problem solved
Thanks again for all precious input I got
Cheers
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
d a checksum of the encrypted
data / key.
Cheers,
Richard
Thanks
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
get stored in the cookie.
Best regards
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
),
statically linked, not stripped
So everythings clear now: One was statically linked, the other
dynamically and I guess, that the meaning of stripped is, if there is
debugging information in the file or not(?), which would make the file
even bigger...
Greettings
Marcel
),
statically linked, not stripped
So everythings clear now: One was statically linked, the other
dynamically and I guess, that the meaning of stripped is, if there is
debugging information in the file or not(?), which would make the file
even bigger...
Greettings
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Bill Marcum wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:44:05PM +0100, Marcel Weber wrote:
What exactly did chkrootkit say about those files? Were they writable
by non-root users, did they have setuid permission, or what?
They had the following access rights:
They had the usual access rights 751
Bill Marcum wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:44:05PM +0100, Marcel Weber wrote:
What exactly did chkrootkit say about those files? Were they writable
by non-root users, did they have setuid permission, or what?
They had the following access rights:
They had the usual access rights 751
The env and netstat were false alarms and the /tmp files
were some CPAN left overs...
Thanks again!
Marcel
nv and netstat were false alarms and the /tmp files
were some CPAN left overs...
Thanks again!
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-7955TMP.txt.gz
Is this a left over from an attempt to hack my system? How can I check
what happened and if the attacker succeeded? The bad thing is, there are
no log files left from august. Has anybody a clue what this
L8823-7955TMP.txt.gz file could be?
Regards
Marcel
L8823-7955TMP.txt
5TMP.txt.gz
Is this a left over from an attempt to hack my system? How can I check
what happened and if the attacker succeeded? The bad thing is, there are
no log files left from august. Has anybody a clue what this
L8823-7955TMP.txt.gz file could be?
Regards
Marcel
L8823-7955TMP.txt
ooked fine in OE. I fear that spammers are going a step further and try
to trick systems like spamassassin. If they do this in a clever way,
they whole spam thing will become even more cumbersome...
Marcel
ne in OE. I fear that spammers are going a step further and try
to trick systems like spamassassin. If they do this in a clever way,
they whole spam thing will become even more cumbersome...
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
trusts this key he should sign it and upload
it to the key server. It interpreted his message as if he thinks that
this key should be okay and wonders why gpg says something about lacking
trust... Perhaps I interpreted to much, as his message wasn't really
describing what he expected.
Regards
Marcel
: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Have you already tried another key server? For example wwwkeys.pgp.net?
Regards
Marcel
his key he should sign it and upload
it to the key server. It interpreted his message as if he thinks that
this key should be okay and wonders why gpg says something about lacking
trust... Perhaps I interpreted to much, as his message wasn't really
describing what he expected.
Regard
gnature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Have you already tried another key server? For example wwwkeys.pgp.net?
Regards
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Marcel Weber wrote:
In the actual case of the hacked servers it was not just a bug, but a
security problem (CAN-2003-0961) without an existing exploit.
I want to correct myself: CAN-2003-0961 dates from the 26th November
2003, as far I could see on the CVE.org site. This means that unless
Marcel Weber wrote:
In the actual case of the hacked servers it was not just a bug, but a
security problem (CAN-2003-0961) without an existing exploit.
I want to correct myself: CAN-2003-0961 dates from the 26th November
2003, as far I could see on the CVE.org site. This means that unless
my mind...
Regards
Marcel
demand (and I cannot demand anything, as I could try to
fix things by myself) that every bug should be fixed and that each time
everyone has to update his / her kernel...
And I did not want to offend anybody with this or my previous post.
These were rather philosophical thoughts that came to my mind
tally risk free. The
question is rather if we are willing to take a certain KNOWN risk or not.
Marcel
PS: I wanted to thank the whole debian security team and everyone who
helped putting together this very detailed and concise report about the
hacked servers.
free. The
question is rather if we are willing to take a certain KNOWN risk or not.
Marcel
PS: I wanted to thank the whole debian security team and everyone who
helped putting together this very detailed and concise report about the
hacked servers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
e we'll be
informed right away. The secteam has done an amazing job in the
past and I trust them to continue as responsible as before.
Cheers, Marcel
pgpzVq3vHaaS1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e we'll be
informed right away. The secteam has done an amazing job in the
past and I trust them to continue as responsible as before.
Cheers, Marcel
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
19 für MIPS
xnc verhindert Zusammenbruch des
Menü-Systems
zlib Sicherheits-Korrektur (CAN-2003-0107)
Regards
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 für MIPS
xnc verhindert Zusammenbruch des
Menü-Systems
zlib Sicherheits-Korrektur (CAN-2003-0107)
Regards
Marcel
defense agency, that monitors and protects the debian systems on a
24/365 base ;-)
Regards
Marcel
se agency, that monitors and protects the debian systems on a
24/365 base ;-)
Regards
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tarjei Huse wrote:
This might help:
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 13:37, Marcel Weber wrote:
Another good thing is the postfix ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mailing
list. It is quite a high traffic mailing list, but there are very
expirienced people reading
Tarjei Huse wrote:
This might help:
http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 13:37, Marcel Weber wrote:
Another good thing is the postfix ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mailing
list. It is quite a high traffic mailing list, but there are very
expirienced people
ming from a private masqueraded network, could misuse your server at
their pleasure, if one user from this network has logged into his pop3
account.
Regards
Marcel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE/N3/y1EXMUTKVE5URAjPsAKD1sVpkeqHSIcYnungYkuF/fNyumgCg7pmF
o2GTZhfgn7NnZ63P8HLSpEI=
=B+0b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
squeraded network, could misuse your server at
their pleasure, if one user from this network has logged into his pop3
account.
Regards
Marcel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE/N3/y1EXMUTKVE5URAjPsAKD1sVpkeqHSIcYnungYkuF/fNyumgCg7pmF
o2GTZhfgn7NnZ63P8HLSpEI=
=B+0b
-END PGP SIG
figuration server.
Regards
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
another CPU, exchange anything in the box.
So after a simple hardware problem all your own data is lost as well,
even if the harddrive is not having any problems.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Harry
Hi
That's right, but aren't you supposed to do backups anyway?
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
other computer...
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s from the configuration server.
Regards
Marcel
, add
another CPU, exchange anything in the box.
So after a simple hardware problem all your own data is lost as well,
even if the harddrive is not having any problems.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Harry
Hi
That's right, but aren't you supposed to do backups anyway?
Marcel
ve in another computer...
Marcel
Is the firewall seperated from the servers or
running ON the servers. It's a good advice to lock down the machines
locally using iptables, but I think that doesn't save you a dedicated
firewall. Might be a Debian GNU/Linux or BSD box or even something
commercial.
Regards
Marcel
--
t least: Is the firewall seperated from the servers or
running ON the servers. It's a good advice to lock down the machines
locally using iptables, but I think that doesn't save you a dedicated
firewall. Might be a Debian GNU/Linux or BSD box or even something
commercial.
Regards
Marcel
Raphael SurcouF wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2003 01:21:44 +0200, Marcel Weber wrote:
I do this with vpnd. The server has a dyndns domain name. On the client
side, you can put in the fully qualified domain name of the server
instead of the ip address. Works quite reliable. Of course from time to
. Works quite reliable. Of course from time to
time the link goes down: Each time the isp cuts the server's connection
to set a new IP adress for it, you will get an interruption until the
client is able to resolve the new IP.
In any case you have to enable the keep alive option of vpnd.
Regards
Marcel
ine:
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
For updating pass apt-get the sources list it should use. In this
example the above file.
apt-get -o=Dir::Etc::SourceList=/etc/apt/sources.security update
This should do the job (except anyone would disagree ;-) )
Regards
Marcel
line:
preprocessor stream4_reassemble
in your /etc/snort/snort.conf
as the vulnerability is in this module. Of course you will loose some
information. But saver is better ;-)
Regards
Marcel
[1]
(http://www.heise.de/newsticker/result.xhtml?url=/newsticker/data/pab-16.04.03-000/default.shtml&words=Snort)
Hobbs, Richard wrote:
Hello,
Where is the 2.4.20 kernel in apt??
Hi
You do not miss anything (or I would miss the same thing...). The 2.4.20
kernel is part of sid and not woody. For a 2.4.20 kernel grab sid's
kernel source or the plain vanilla kernel from kernel.org.
Regards
Marcel
gious
background with whatever opinion that might results
from this!
Marcel
--
--
.' `
! :' !
`. `´ Debian/GNU Linux
`- More than sofftware
gious
background with whatever opinion that might results
from this!
Marcel
--
--
.' `
! :' !
`. `´ Debian/GNU Linux
`- More than sofftware
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Isn't this a product advertisement? I'm quoting the debian mailing list
policies:
Debian mailing list advertising policy
This policy is intended to fight mailing-list "spamming".
The Debian mailing lists accept commercial advertising for payment. The
fee for advertisments is a donat
Hi
Isn't this a product advertisement? I'm quoting the debian mailing list
policies:
Debian mailing list advertising policy
This policy is intended to fight mailing-list "spamming".
The Debian mailing lists accept commercial advertising for payment. The
fee for advertisments is a donation
do this. It
is part of the computer browser service.
Marcel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj5T1wgACgkQ1EXMUTKVE5VXhQCggFE8rxBbMOfpXtLdPkeD/G0W
BYoAoOw3TK5MNmfiKoE+YCzmYyu3dKV1
=KuRi
-END
do this. It
is part of the computer browser service.
Marcel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj5T1wgACgkQ1EXMUTKVE5VXhQCggFE8rxBbMOfpXtLdPkeD/G0W
BYoAoOw3TK5MNmfiKoE+YCzmYyu3dKV1
=KuRi
-END
ugins package.
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=nagios&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Cheers, Marcel
ugins package.
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=nagios&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Cheers, Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ughput >100MBit/s
Other nice things that were cool:
- - Authentication against NT Domain / Active Directory
I already took a look at the 3com Superstack III Firewall, which seems
quite decent to me. But I did not find anything about VPN interop with
Linux / Macs.
Any ideas / advices?
Regard
t;100MBit/s
Other nice things that were cool:
- - Authentication against NT Domain / Active Directory
I already took a look at the 3com Superstack III Firewall, which seems
quite decent to me. But I did not find anything about VPN interop with
Linux / Macs.
Any ideas / advices?
Regards
Marcel
-
www.openssl.org, upgrading to openssl-0.9.6g is recommended.
Hi
Don't worry about this message.
As far as I know, all security fixes have been backported from 0.9.6g to
the woody version. From a security point of view, both packages are equal.
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
www.openssl.org, upgrading to openssl-0.9.6g is recommended.
Hi
Don't worry about this message.
As far as I know, all security fixes have been backported from 0.9.6g to
the woody version. From a security point of view, both packages are equal.
Marcel
a 30 days period. And as far as
I know there are no free ftp-ssl clients yet.
-==-
Regards,
Marcel
a 30 days period. And as far as
I know there are no free ftp-ssl clients yet.
-==-
Regards,
Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mysql tables. I
would really recommend using sql tables for authentication. Like this
the pop3 user base is seperated from the unix user base (imagine someone
sniffing a unix password and you forgot to disable login for the pop3
users...)
Marcel
- --
Marcel Weber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GP
mysql tables. I
would really recommend using sql tables for authentication. Like this
the pop3 user base is seperated from the unix user base (imagine someone
sniffing a unix password and you forgot to disable login for the pop3
users...)
Marcel
- --
Marcel Weber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GP
well as the tool itself.
What about considering outdated security tools as hazardous to the
system's security? Taking this point of view, why not distributing
updated versions via debian-security?
Marcel
- --
Marcel Weber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweb
well as the tool itself.
What about considering outdated security tools as hazardous to the
system's security? Taking this point of view, why not distributing
updated versions via debian-security?
Marcel
- --
Marcel Weber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanasaki JiJi schrieb:
| 1.8.4-Beta1 Build 91
|
| It also seems to be dying without any reports to syslog
|
This also happens to my setup. I'm restarting snort every night now.
Marcel
- --
Marcel Weber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GPG Key:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanasaki JiJi schrieb:
| 1.8.4-Beta1 Build 91
|
| It also seems to be dying without any reports to syslog
|
This also happens to my setup. I'm restarting snort every night now.
Marcel
- --
Marcel Weber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GPG Key:
save me an additional switch though ;-)
I hope that I am not asking a question too silly for this list... I did
an RTFM, but I did not find any hint for this problem...
Regards
Marcel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.
save me an additional switch though ;-)
I hope that I am not asking a question too silly for this list... I did
an RTFM, but I did not find any hint for this problem...
Regards
Marcel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.
--On Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 11:54 +0100 "Thomas J. Zeeman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well lets hope that the fire doesn't make and casualties.
From the various news-articles I gather the firesquad doesn't expect them.
But the question remains, where is the mirror for security.debai
--On Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 11:54 +0100 "Thomas J. Zeeman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well lets hope that the fire doesn't make and casualties.
From the various news-articles I gather the firesquad doesn't expect them.
But the question remains, where is the mirror for security.debain.
e good for. If by the way
somebody knows it already I would appreciate.
Regards
Marcel
Arne Rusek wrote:
| On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:54:01PM +0100, Marcel Weber wrote:
|
|>Hi
|>
|>Today I had a whole bunch of large ICMP packages on the company's LAN
|>(about 20).
|>Interesting is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Thanks very much. The probably hacked windows 2000 servers have nothing to do
with
debian though. I first thought of a false snort alarm of the debian box I
am using as a nids.
Goosh... Windoze is evil though...
Marcel
[EMAIL PROTECTED
re or less weird content. They have no "Don't fragment" flags set, so I
wonder where they come from and what they good for.
Has anybody seem such packets yet? (See attachment)
Regards
Marcel
Frame 3 (2090 on wire, 2090 captured)
Arrival Time: Nov 18, 2002 07:31:22.567756000
e good for. If by the way
somebody knows it already I would appreciate.
Regards
Marcel
Arne Rusek wrote:
| On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:54:01PM +0100, Marcel Weber wrote:
|
|>Hi
|>
|>Today I had a whole bunch of large ICMP packages on the company's LAN
|>(about 20).
|>Interesting is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Thanks very much. The probably hacked windows 2000 servers have nothing to do with
debian though. I first thought of a false snort alarm of the debian box I
am using as a nids.
Goosh... Windoze is evil though...
Marcel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
re or less weird content. They have no "Don't fragment" flags set, so I
wonder where they come from and what they good for.
Has anybody seem such packets yet? (See attachment)
Regards
Marcel
Frame 3 (2090 on wire, 2090 captured)
Arrival Time: Nov 18, 2002 07:31:22.567756000
uot;. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>
|>
|>--
|>Jonathan Crockett
|>Network Engineer
|>Midcontinent Communications
|>
|>
|>--
|>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|
|
-
Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>>
|>
|>--
|>Jonathan Crockett
|>Network Engineer
|>Midcontinent Communications
|>
|>
|>--
|>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|
|
- --
Mar
hints apart from patching the
init script to set/restore the hardlink?
Cheers, Marcel
hints apart from patching the
init script to set/restore the hardlink?
Cheers, Marcel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think he meant France with the limitation of 56 bit encription.
Marcel
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweber-at-ncpro-com.asc
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donne
I think he meant France with the limitation of 56 bit encription.
Marcel
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweber-at-ncpro-com.asc
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Donne
hould have got a
403 response instead. Has he passed the "deny from all" then?
(exerpt from the httpd.conf)
Order allow,deny
deny from all
Like this he should never get an 404 response, should he?
Regards
Marcel
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.
er is an older Compaq Proliant 800, some Pentium
133 MHz. Rather slow, perhaps this has an influence.
Below are the error.log and access.log in question an at the end the
relevant section of the httpd.conf.
Regards
M
hould have got a
403 response instead. Has he passed the "deny from all" then?
(exerpt from the httpd.conf)
Order allow,deny
deny from all
Like this he should never get an 404 response, should he?
Regards
Marcel
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.
erver is an older Compaq Proliant 800, some Pentium
133 MHz. Rather slow, perhaps this has an influence.
Below are the error.log and access.log in question an at the end the
relevant section of the httpd.conf.
Regards
M
You're right. Apparently he IS a lamer, at least his name is lamer style. I
remember those from my Amiga times... And further more they usually have a
bigger problem with their spelling...
Marcel
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweber-at-ncpro-co
You're right. Apparently he IS a lamer, at least his name is lamer style. I
remember those from my Amiga times... And further more they usually have a
bigger problem with their spelling...
Marcel
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweber-at-ncpro-co
s.
Enough flaming for today. Anyway, this list should not be the place for
this, but I could not hold back...
Marcel
Am Donnerstag den, 3. Oktober 2002, um 06:51, schrieb _ArKiTeKt0_:
Dont worry Ivo, debian's users are always dorks and lame people who
doesnt know even how to insta
gs.
Enough flaming for today. Anyway, this list should not be the place for
this, but I could not hold back...
Marcel
Am Donnerstag den, 3. Oktober 2002, um 06:51, schrieb _ArKiTeKt0_:
> Dont worry Ivo, debian's users are always dorks and lame people who
> doesnt know even how to
ed... When mutt had finally managed to delete 5000 mails,
during that time at least the same amount of new mails had
arrived already. Stuffed my line quite a bit...
Cheers, Marcel
tries.
Marcel
Am Donnerstag den, 12. September 2002, um 05:24, schrieb Peter Cordes:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:00:13AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
I understand that the tools exist, but I'd be very cautious before
donning your white hat and becoming the next Internet vigilante. Of
course
Thanks to those who replied. I now have somewhere to start :)
Marcel
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 16:16, Ralf Dreibrodt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Sorry i know this is off topic but dose anyone know where theres a good
> > > HOW-TO on Seting up SAMBA as a print server ??
>
>
Well, but you're right: This is a beautyful tool on a companies network. But
if used on the internet, there could be legal issues. Why not introduce an
official "Internet Security Team" that officially has the right to do such
things. It would be for the good of the net!
WTO-5.html#ss5.8
Hope this helps a bit. Just a hint: There would be other mailinglists
covering your question...
Marcel
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweber-at-ncpro-com.asc
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Marcel Welschbillig [ma
Sorry i know this is off topic but dose anyone know where theres a good
HOW-TO on Seting up SAMBA as a print server ??
Thanks
Marcel
d for changing the user's information like passwords, name and so
on.
Marcel
-
PGP / GPG Key:http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweber-at-ncpro-com.asc
pgpymi5ohoIY9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
