Hi
> I'm not sure I understand you correctly, but how about this:
>
> ## 0 == LOG
> ## 1 == DROP
> ## 2 == LOG & DROP
> LOGTCP=2;
> if [ $LOGTCP -eq 0 ]; then
> #Log forbidden TCP datagrams
> iptables -A TCP --protocol tcp -m limit --limit 1/minute \
> --limit-burst 4 -j LOG --log-le
Hi
> I'm not sure I understand you correctly, but how about this:
>
> ## 0 == LOG
> ## 1 == DROP
> ## 2 == LOG & DROP
> LOGTCP=2;
> if [ $LOGTCP -eq 0 ]; then
> #Log forbidden TCP datagrams
> iptables -A TCP --protocol tcp -m limit --limit 1/minute \
> --limit-burst 4 -j LOG --log-l
Hi
> Hi all,
>
> I still have a masquerade problem, and nothing helps me to go to the right
> way.
>
> This is my configuration :
>
> A server (10.0.0.1) with internet access on eth0, and local network access
why you don't assign an internet number on eth0 if your eth0 interfaces
is on the inter
Hi
> Hi all,
>
> I still have a masquerade problem, and nothing helps me to go to the right
> way.
>
> This is my configuration :
>
> A server (10.0.0.1) with internet access on eth0, and local network access
why you don't assign an internet number on eth0 if your eth0 interfaces
is on the inte
hi
[...]
> If you disable icmp pings then you can hide from most scans.
... and you break also the RFC ...
---
;---+---;
bye |
bye |hor
hi
[...]
> If you disable icmp pings then you can hide from most scans.
... and you break also the RFC ...
---
;---+---;
bye |
bye |hor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
> On Friday 16 February 2001 09:38, Thor wrote:
> --snip--
> > You can use 'dd' only if you have the same identical model of hard-disk
> > or at least the same geometry ! In other case you may have several
problem
> > on the cloned hd ...
>
>
>
Hi
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > i am sure that is note the case,
> > the only requirement is that the target media is the
> > same size or larger?
>
> Indeed. Most filesystems, including ext2, are independent of the disk
> geometry. So you can "dd" _partitions_ (eg /dev/hda
Hi
> On Friday 16 February 2001 09:38, Thor wrote:
> --snip--
> > You can use 'dd' only if you have the same identical model of hard-disk
> > or at least the same geometry ! In other case you may have several
problem
> > on the cloned hd ...
>
>
>
Hi
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > i am sure that is note the case,
> > the only requirement is that the target media is the
> > same size or larger?
>
> Indeed. Most filesystems, including ext2, are independent of the disk
> geometry. So you can "dd" _partitions_ (eg /dev/hd
Hi
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:34:07 +0100
> Raphael Bauduin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm looking for a way to install a debian potato as securely
> > as possible. I would follow this procedure in the future to
> > install a lot of servers. The problem I have is that a lot of
> > unwa
Hi
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:34:07 +0100
> Raphael Bauduin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm looking for a way to install a debian potato as securely
> > as possible. I would follow this procedure in the future to
> > install a lot of servers. The problem I have is that a lot of
> > unw
Hi
I receive this log by mail from my server but
dont understand
In my /etc/hosts.deny i have :
ALL:ALL:spawn (safe_finger -l @%h | mail -s %u-%c
root) &:banners /usr/local/etc/banners/denyportmap: ALL
This is a mail f
Hi
I receive this log by mail from my server but
dont understand
In my /etc/hosts.deny i have :
ALL:ALL:spawn (safe_finger -l @%h | mail -s %u-%c
root) &:banners /usr/local/etc/banners/denyportmap: ALL
This is a mail f
Hi all
I would authenticate the ftp access with an OTP system.
It's possible ? Can i apply otp to wu-ftpd or i must change the ftp server ?
Someone have an idea, url, news, library, program to do this ?
everything is good for me ;-)
TIA
---
;---+---;
bye |
bye |hor
Hi all
I would authenticate the ftp access with an OTP system.
It's possible ? Can i apply otp to wu-ftpd or i must change the ftp server ?
Someone have an idea, url, news, library, program to do this ?
everything is good for me ;-)
TIA
---
;---+---;
bye |
bye |hor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
m sure .. i've tryed the command as explained in bugtraq
i've waited 15 minute but nothing else except this
2 line in the log
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Thor wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Debian 2.2 IS vulnerable to the following DO
Hi
>
> Debian 2.2 IS vulnerable to the following DOS reported by Fabio
> Pietrosanti (naif) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in bugtraq:
>
i'm sorry but i've tryed also on my system with debian potato 2.2
and bind 8.2.2P5-11 and the server appear NOT vulnerable
> >>
>
> Here is my daemon.log:
>
> Nov 9 1
m sure .. i've tryed the command as explained in bugtraq
i've waited 15 minute but nothing else except this
2 line in the log
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Thor wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Debian 2.2 IS vulnerable to the following DO
Hi
>
> Debian 2.2 IS vulnerable to the following DOS reported by Fabio
> Pietrosanti (naif) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in bugtraq:
>
i'm sorry but i've tryed also on my system with debian potato 2.2
and bind 8.2.2P5-11 and the server appear NOT vulnerable
> >>
>
> Here is my daemon.log:
>
> Nov 9
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 04:50:27PM +1100, Ian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a slink->potato->woody server, and I am a little concerned about
the permissions some of the log files in /var/log have.
> >
> > There are too many to list, but here are some:
> > -rw-r--r--1 root root 823234
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 04:50:27PM +1100, Ian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a slink->potato->woody server, and I am a little concerned about
the permissions some of the log files in /var/log have.
> >
> > There are too many to list, but here are some:
> > -rw-r--r--1 root root 82323
Hi,
> I'm obviously doing something wrong ...
>
> I've written to the maintainer of the autofs package according to the
> page summary listed under 'packages' from the website, and as I also saw
> somewhere else (dpkg -s listing?). I filed a bug report against autofs
> and marked it as release
Hi,
> I'm obviously doing something wrong ...
>
> I've written to the maintainer of the autofs package according to the
> page summary listed under 'packages' from the website, and as I also saw
> somewhere else (dpkg -s listing?). I filed a bug report against autofs
> and marked it as release
24 matches
Mail list logo
