Hello Debian Community!
I had hoped to hear from you, and hear from us we have. I look forward
to hearing from more of you around our world. I would like to address
some of the issues about this thread being off topic.
The debian-security list is an open, unmoderated, list created with the
int
Hello Debian Community!
I had hoped to hear from you, and hear from us we have. I look forward
to hearing from more of you around our world. I would like to address
some of the issues about this thread being off topic.
The debian-security list is an open, unmoderated, list created with the
int
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:53:25PM -0700, Didier Caamano wrote:
>
> Let say I have 3 computers a, b, c.
> a: Has a useless IP address (so far as I know) a 10.ip.add.ress and cannot
> connect to any service ecept html.
> b: Has a normal IP and is able to serve as telnet server but not ssh.
> c: Is
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:53:25PM -0700, Didier Caamano wrote:
>
> Let say I have 3 computers a, b, c.
> a: Has a useless IP address (so far as I know) a 10.ip.add.ress and cannot
> connect to any service ecept html.
> b: Has a normal IP and is able to serve as telnet server but not ssh.
> c: Is
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:10:29PM -, Jeff wrote:
> Way off topic - please take the thread private or somewhere more
> appropriate.
> I subscribe to this list for Debian security announcements.
Then subscribe to "debian-security-announce" instead of
"debian-security".
Which is defined as "Di
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:10:29PM -, Jeff wrote:
> Way off topic - please take the thread private or somewhere more
> appropriate.
> I subscribe to this list for Debian security announcements.
Then subscribe to "debian-security-announce" instead of
"debian-security".
Which is defined as "Di
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:09:08PM +0200, Birzan George Cristian wrote:
>
> The fact that it shouldn't be used for storing any dangerous information
> doesn't mean it's not being used for that. What I am asking, in case my
> original mail wasn't clear enough, is why _shouldn't_ it be 750 or 700
>
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:09:08PM +0200, Birzan George Cristian wrote:
>
> The fact that it shouldn't be used for storing any dangerous information
> doesn't mean it's not being used for that. What I am asking, in case my
> original mail wasn't clear enough, is why _shouldn't_ it be 750 or 700
>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:08:40PM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> 2003-03-03 05:19:37
> H=(cyberproxy.com) [218.22.143.178]
> F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected RCPT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Please go away.
>
SPAM, SPAM, SPAM...
Somebody is trying to relay...
At least that is what it
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:08:40PM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> 2003-03-03 05:19:37
> H=(cyberproxy.com) [218.22.143.178]
> F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected RCPT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Please go away.
>
SPAM, SPAM, SPAM...
Somebody is trying to relay...
At least that is what it
authority. I believe that if you allow
yourself to entertain the idea that your leaders are not serving you or
your fellow citizen's best interests you may find that they have and are
continuing to lie to you.
Ted
<<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>>
Ted Parvu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://parvu.net
authority. I believe that if you allow
yourself to entertain the idea that your leaders are not serving you or
your fellow citizen's best interests you may find that they have and are
continuing to lie to you.
Ted
<<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>>
Ted Parvu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://parvu.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Net to understand what is really going on here.
Ted
<<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>>
Ted Parvu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://parvu.net
Net to understand what is really going on here.
Ted
<<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>><<>><><<>><><<>>
Ted Parvu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://parvu.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:53:42PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >on me, then they certianly can put a line sniffer between me and my
> >ISP... isn't that
> >easier?!?!
>
> No need to put it between, their packet sniffer is already in place at
> your ISP. Please read about CARNIVORE, which made
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:53:42PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >on me, then they certianly can put a line sniffer between me and my
> >ISP... isn't that
> >easier?!?!
>
> No need to put it between, their packet sniffer is already in place at
> your ISP. Please read about CARNIVORE, which made
://blade-software.com/ your service provider's
virtual domain for this resolves to their home page. Probably not what
you want.
If you feel any of this was useful you can send some resources my way
via this page. http://parvu.net/support.html
P.S. Any chance you could set the line wrap on yo
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 06:33:41PM +0200, Boyan Krosnov wrote:
> I thought we already have a free tool for the same intended purpose. It
> was called nmap last time I checked.
>
Hmm... I use nmap frequently to scan firewalls, my own of course. :^)
Perhaps, this firewall informer is for the poin
://blade-software.com/ your service provider's
virtual domain for this resolves to their home page. Probably not what
you want.
If you feel any of this was useful you can send some resources my way
via this page. http://parvu.net/support.html
P.S. Any chance you could set the line wrap on yo
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 06:33:41PM +0200, Boyan Krosnov wrote:
> I thought we already have a free tool for the same intended purpose. It
> was called nmap last time I checked.
>
Hmm... I use nmap frequently to scan firewalls, my own of course. :^)
Perhaps, this firewall informer is for the poin
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:02:18AM +, Brett Parker wrote:
>
> Not sure that that helps, but I think just looking at ssh portforwarding
> is a misnomer, someone please correct me if I'm wrong :)
My apologies for my flippant RTFM response.
What I really meant to say was that there are a plenty
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:02:18AM +, Brett Parker wrote:
>
> Not sure that that helps, but I think just looking at ssh portforwarding
> is a misnomer, someone please correct me if I'm wrong :)
My apologies for my flippant RTFM response.
What I really meant to say was that there are a plenty
What you probably need to look into is doing "port forwarding" with
ssh and sshd.
You can find info in the man pages and of course via google.
Ted
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:51:04PM -0600, George Smith wrote:
> Gentleman:
>
> What we are trying to do is as follows. We are not
> linux savvy so
What you probably need to look into is doing "port forwarding" with
ssh and sshd.
You can find info in the man pages and of course via google.
Ted
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:51:04PM -0600, George Smith wrote:
> Gentleman:
>
> What we are trying to do is as follows. We are not
> linux savvy so
ch of the archives
wasn't very productive for me.
thanks.
--- "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:08:40AM -0800, Ted Parvu
> wrote:
> > This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
> > post to the debian securi
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
post to the debian security list.
This is only a test. If you are reading this, then
the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem
right.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affor
ch of the archives
wasn't very productive for me.
thanks.
--- "Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:08:40AM -0800, Ted Parvu
> wrote:
> > This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
> > post to the debian securi
This is a test to see if a non-subscribed user can
post to the debian security list.
This is only a test. If you are reading this, then
the answer is yes and that just doesn't seem
right.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affor
Not sure that your sendmail problem is related to this issue but...
It looks like you have an anonymous ftp account enabled on your machine.
Considering that these IPs are logging in for less than one minute I
would venture to guess that "they" are scanning IPs looking for
anonymous ftp accounts
Not sure that your sendmail problem is related to this issue but...
It looks like you have an anonymous ftp account enabled on your machine.
Considering that these IPs are logging in for less than one minute I
would venture to guess that "they" are scanning IPs looking for
anonymous ftp accounts
30 matches
Mail list logo
