Re: IPSec VPN

2002-08-11 Thread Quietman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Jens Hafner wrote: > I'm trying to connect my Win2k professional Laptop to my company's VPN. The VPN-Masquerade-HOWTO has full instructions on the patching of a 2.2 kernel to masquerade IPSEC. It is available at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/VPN-Masquerade-H

Re: rlinetd security

2001-06-19 Thread Quietman
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:25:17PM -0500, Ted Cabeen wrote: > >It's true that uninstalling it (in potato, anyway) is not worth all the > >effort. But you can definitely disable it. I have "K20inetd" links in > >all my /etc/rc?.d directories where I don't want to run inetd. > > Unfortunately, you

Re: rlinetd security

2001-06-19 Thread Quietman
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:25:17PM -0500, Ted Cabeen wrote: > >It's true that uninstalling it (in potato, anyway) is not worth all the > >effort. But you can definitely disable it. I have "K20inetd" links in > >all my /etc/rc?.d directories where I don't want to run inetd. > > Unfortunately, yo

Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: checking security logs)

2001-01-30 Thread Quietman
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:54:41AM +, Quietman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:56:12PM +, thomas lakofski wrote: > > ipchains -L -n > Excuse me if I'm missing the point, but what will this show other than > any rules you already have in place? And obviously, how ma

Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: checking security logs)

2001-01-30 Thread Quietman
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:56:12PM +, thomas lakofski wrote: > ipchains -L -n Excuse me if I'm missing the point, but what will this show other than any rules you already have in place? Cheers, Tom -- Your CHEEKS sit like twin NECTARINES above a MOUTH that knows no BOUNDS --

Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: checking security logs)

2001-01-30 Thread Quietman
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:54:41AM +, Quietman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:56:12PM +, thomas lakofski wrote: > > ipchains -L -n > Excuse me if I'm missing the point, but what will this show other than > any rules you already have in place? And obviously, how ma

Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: checking security logs)

2001-01-30 Thread Quietman
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:56:12PM +, thomas lakofski wrote: > ipchains -L -n Excuse me if I'm missing the point, but what will this show other than any rules you already have in place? Cheers, Tom -- Your CHEEKS sit like twin NECTARINES above a MOUTH that knows no BOUNDS -- -- To UNSUB