On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:56:12PM +0000, thomas lakofski wrote: > ipchains -L -n Excuse me if I'm missing the point, but what will this show other than any rules you already have in place? Cheers, Tom -- Your CHEEKS sit like twin NECTARINES above a MOUTH that knows no BOUNDS -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: checking... Tim Haynes
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: che... Peter Cordes
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: che... Rainer Weikusat
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: che... Rainer Weikusat
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: che... Quietman
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: che... Quietman
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: che... Rainer Weikusat
- Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re:... thomas lakofski